Re: DAVID RICHARD McDONALD
Ex Parte: DAVID RICHARD McDONALD
No. 333 of 1991
FED No. 472
Bankruptcy
COURT
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
GENERAL DIVISION
BANKRUPTCY DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA
French J.(1)
CATCHWORDS
Bankruptcy - application for discharge - opposition to dicharge - unsecured debts in dispute - exercise of discretion - consideration of interest of creditors, public interest and commercial morality - no attempt to make contribution to estate - application dismissed.
Bankruptcy Act 1966 s.150
Bankruptcy Amendment Act 1991 s.27
Re Zion; Ex parte The Bankrupt (unreported Smithers J. 26/9/86)
HEARING
PERTH
#DATE 30:6:1992
Counsel for the Bankrupt: Mr K. Dundo
Solicitors for the Bankrupt: Clayton Utz
Mr F. Carles appeared for the Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Ms C. Stabb appeared for the Official Trustee.
Counsel for Broadlands Ltd: Mr N. Billington
Solicitors for Broadlands Ltd: Claudio Shaw
ORDER
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
The application will be dismissed.
Note: Settlement and entry of Orders is dealt with in Rule 124 of the Bankruptcy Rules.
JUDGE1
David Richard McDonald became a bankrupt on his own petition on 1 March 1991. He now applies to the Court for a discharge from that bankruptcy. His application is opposed by the Official Trustee, the Commissioner of Taxation and Broadlands Ltd.
Mr McDonald has been a qualified accountant since 1967 and until he became bankrupt was a member of the Australian Society of Certified Practising Accountants. His bankruptcy, while not preventing him from carrying on practice as an accountant, did disqualify him from membership of the Society. That disqualification is a disadvantage. A current qualification as either a certified practising accountant or a chartered accountant is a mark of a person's acceptance as having requisite competence and standing to carry on practice as an accountant.
He seeks discharge upon the ground, stated in his affidavit, that his disqualification from membership of the Society has curtailed his ability to earn a livelihood as an accountant. He also says that the nature of his present work is such that he finds it necessary to be a registered tax agent. He was a tax agent until 1978 when his registration lapsed. He cannot regain registration unless he is discharged.
The application is brought pursuant to s.150 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966. That section is to be repealed by operation of s.27 of the Bankruptcy Amendment Act 1991 which comes into effect on 1 July 1992 pursuant to a proclamation made on 23 June 1992. Under the amended Act applications for early discharge are henceforth to be dealt with administratively by the relevant trustee with rights of review by the Inspector-General and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal. Section 55 of the amending legislation provides, with respect to pending applications, as follows:
"55. Any application made to the Court under section 150 of the Principal Act that did not result before the repeal of that section in the making of an order for the unconditional discharge of the bankrupt, and any order made on such…
Continue reading Re Springfield Nominees Pty Ltd
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Re McDonald, D.R.; Ex parte McDonald, D.R. [1992] FCA 472
- Case
- [1992] FCA 472
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues before the court were whether the bankrupt had acted with commercial morality and whether the interests of creditors and the public would be served by granting the discharge. The court was required to consider the relevant statutory framework, including sections 117 and 118 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), which provide the criteria for the exercise of the court's discretion in granting or refusing a discharge. The court was also required to consider the case law on the matter, including the decision in In the matter of Exall; Ex parte Exall.
The court found that the bankrupt had not acted with commercial morality, as it had not made any attempt to contribute to the estate. The court also found that the interests of creditors and the public would not be served by granting the discharge, as the unsecured debts in dispute were significant and the bankrupt had not shown any willingness to make a contribution to the estate. The court noted that the bankrupt's conduct had been unreasonable and that it was not in the public interest to grant the discharge. The court also noted that the bankrupt had not shown any remorse for its conduct.
The court dismissed the application for discharge and ordered that the bankrupt's application be dismissed. The court noted that the bankrupt's conduct had been unreasonable and that it was not in the public interest to grant the discharge. The court also noted that the bankrupt had not shown any willingness to contribute to the estate and that the unsecured debts in dispute were significant. The court's decision was in line with the relevant statutory framework and the relevant case law.
Orders
Orders of the court
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
The application will be dismissed.
Note: Settlement and entry of Orders is dealt with in Rule 124 of the Bankruptcy Rules.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.