FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Silver Lake Resources Limited, in the matter of Silver Lake Resources Limited [2012] FCA 32
Citation: Silver Lake Resources Limited, in the matter of Silver Lake Resources Limited [2012] FCA 32 Party: SILVER LAKE RESOURCES LIMITED (ACN 108 779 782) File number: WAD 518 of 2011 Judge: SIOPIS J Date of judgment: 31 January 2012 Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – a company issued shares to which s 707(3) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) applied – company did not comply with s 708A(5)(e) of the Corporations Act by issuing a cleansing notice – on‑market trading in the shares occurred without compliance with disclosure requirements of s 707(3) of the Corporations Act – whether a declaration should be made validating the trading in the shares. Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 707(3), 708A(5)(e), 708A(11), 1322(4)(a), 1322(4)(c), 1322(6)(a), 1322(6)(c) Cases cited: Re Golden Gate Petroleum Ltd (2010) 77 ACSR 17
Re Elemental Minerals Ltd (2010) 79 ACSR 277Date of hearing: Determined on the papers. Date of last submissions: 6 January 2012 Place: Perth Division: GENERAL DIVISION Category: Catchwords Number of paragraphs: 25 Counsel for the Plaintiff: Mr TP O’Leary Solicitor for the Plaintiff: Gilbert + Tobin Lawyers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
WAD 518 of 2011
IN THE MATTER OF SILVER LAKE RESOURCES LIMITED (ACN 108 779 782)
SILVER LAKE RESOURCES LIMITED (ACN 108 779 782)
Plaintiff
JUDGE:
SIOPIS J
DATE OF ORDER:
31 JANUARY 2012
WHERE MADE:
PERTH
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.Pursuant to s 1322(4)(a) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Act), any offer for sale or sale of the shares of Silver Lake Resources Limited (Plaintiff) issued to the persons on the dates appearing at Annexure A to these orders by reason of the exercise of options granted by the Plaintiff, is not invalid by reason of the Plaintiff’s failure to comply with s 708A(5)(e) of the Act.
2.Pursuant to s 1322(4)(c) of the Act, the sellers of the shares referred to in Annexure A to these orders be wholly relieved from any civil liability arising out of contravention of s 707(3) of the Act, or by reason of the Plaintiff’s failure to comply with s 708A(5)(e) of the Act.
3.A sealed copy of these orders be served on the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) as soon as reasonably practicable and upon service of these orders on ASIC, ASIC is to include these orders on its database.
4.As soon as reasonably practicable, the Plaintiff is to publish an announcement (Announcement) to the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) that includes a copy of the orders made.
5.For a period of 28 days from the date of publication by the ASX of the Announcement, any person to whom substantial injustice has been or is likely to be caused by the making of order 1 and order 2 above, has liberty to apply to vary or discharge that order.
6.There be no orders as to costs.
Annexure A
Date of Issue
Name
Continue reading Re Silver Lake Resources Ltd
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Re Silver Lake Resources Ltd [2012] FCA 32
- Case
- [2012] FCA 32
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court considered the purpose of the disclosure requirements under section 707(3) of the Act, which is to ensure that information about the trading of securities is made available to the market. However, the court also noted that the primary responsibility for compliance with the disclosure requirements rests with the company. The court found that the failure to issue a cleansing notice and to comply with the disclosure requirements did not necessarily result in substantial injustice to the persons who traded the shares. The court also considered the discretion provided under section 1322(4) of the Act to declare the trading to be valid.
The court determined that the failure to comply with the statutory provisions did not render the trading of the shares invalid, and that the sellers of the shares should be relieved from any civil liability arising out of the contravention of the Act. The court made orders declaring that the trading of the shares was valid, relieving the sellers from any civil liability, and requiring the company to publish an announcement to the Australian Securities Exchange. Any person who suffered substantial injustice as a result of the orders had the right to apply to the court to vary or discharge the orders. The court made no orders as to costs.
In summary, the court validated the trading of the shares issued by Silver Lake Resources Limited, despite the company's failure to comply with certain statutory provisions. The court exercised its discretion under section 1322(4) of the Act to declare the trading to be valid, and to relieve the sellers from any civil liability. The company was required to publish an announcement to the Australian Securities Exchange, and any person who suffered substantial injustice had the right to apply to the court to vary or discharge the orders.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. Pursuant to s 1322(4)(a) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Act), any offer for sale or sale of the shares of Silver Lake Resources Limited (Plaintiff) issued to the persons on the dates appearing at Annexure A to these orders by reason of the exercise of options granted by the Plaintiff, is not invalid by reason of the Plaintiff’s failure to comply with s 708A(5)(e) of the Act.
2. Pursuant to s 1322(4)(c) of the Act, the sellers of the shares referred to in Annexure A to these orders be wholly relieved from any civil liability arising out of contravention of s 707(3) of the Act, or by reason of the Plaintiff’s failure to comply with s 708A(5)(e) of the Act.
3. A sealed copy of these orders be served on the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) as soon as reasonably practicable and upon service of these orders on ASIC, ASIC is to include these orders on its database.
4. As soon as reasonably practicable, the Plaintiff is to publish an announcement (Announcement) to the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) that includes a copy of the orders made.
5. For a period of 28 days from the date of publication by the ASX of the Announcement, any person to whom substantial injustice has been or is likely to be caused by the making of order 1 and order 2 above, has liberty to apply to vary or discharge that order.
6. There be no orders as to costs.
Annexure A
Date of Issue
Name
Number of shares
24.10.11
UBS Nominess Pty Ltd
199,998
30.09.11
National Nominees Limited
249,996
06.10.11
Swiss Asia Capital (Singapore) Pte Ltd
129,996
03.10.11
National Nominees Limited
325,844
30.09.11
Bond Street Custodians Limited
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.