Re Opus Group Limited

Case [2018] FCA 959


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

OPUS Group Limited, in the matter of OPUS Group Limited [2018] FCA 959

File number(s): WAD 310 of 2018
Judge(s): BANKS-SMITH J
Date of judgment: 26 July 2018
Date of publication: 27 July 2018
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – scheme of arrangement – application under s 411(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) to convene a meeting to consider a proposed scheme of arrangement – proposed redomiciliation from Australia to Bermuda – orders made
Legislation:

Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 411

Corporations Regulations 2001 (Cth)

Cases cited:

Amcom Telecommunications Ltd, in the matter of Amcom Telecommunications Ltd [2015] FCA 341

Brambles Industries Ltd, in the matter of Brambles Industries [2006] FCA 1273; (2006) 59 ACSR 501

Brambles Industries Ltd, in the matter of Brambles Industries (No 2) [2006] FCA 1719

EcoBiotics Limited, in the matter of EcoBiotics Limited [2017] FCA 643

MDA National Ltd v Medical Defence Australia Ltd (2014) FCA 954

Programmed Maintenance Services Ltd, in the matter of Programmed Maintenance Services Ltd [2017] FCA 1265

Re APN News & Media [2007] FCA 770; (2007) 62 ACSR 400

Re CSR Limited [2003] FCA 82; (2003) 45 ACSR 34

Re Heartware Limited [2008] FCA 1997

Re Hostworks Group Ltd [2008] FCA 64; (2008) 26 ACLC 137

Re Marengo Mining Ltd (No 2) [2012] FCA 1498

Re Westfield Holdings Ltd [2004] NSWSC 458; (2004) 49 ACSR 734, 736

Signature Gold Ltd, in the matter of Signature Gold Ltd [2017] FCA 1481

Date of hearing: 26 July 2018
Registry: Western Australia
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Corporations and Corporate Insolvency
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 40
Counsel for the Plaintiff: Mr SK Dharmananda SC with Mr JY Wang
Solicitor for the Plaintiff: King and Wood Mallesons

ORDERS

WAD 310 of 2018

IN THE MATTER OF OPUS GROUP LIMITED (ACN 006 162 876)

OPUS GROUP LIMITED (ACN 006 162 876)
Plaintiff

JUDGE:

BANKS-SMITH J

DATE OF ORDER:

26 JULY 2018

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.The plaintiff convene a meeting of holders of fully paid ordinary shares (Shares) in the capital of the plaintiff (Shareholders) as at 7pm AEST on 4 September 2018 for the purpose of considering and, if thought fit, approving (with or without amendment) the proposed scheme of arrangement (Scheme) which is Annexure C to the typeset version of the draft scheme booklet and explanatory statement, being Annexure ABVM-10 to the affidavit of Ana Brenda Valdez Martinez sworn and filed on 26 July 2018 (Scheme Booklet), and such meeting to be held at 11am AEST at Club Rivers, 32 Littleton Street, Riverwood, New South Wales on 6 September 2018 or such other date as the Court may approve (Scheme Meeting).

2.Subject to these orders, the Scheme Meeting is to be convened, held and conducted in accordance with:

(a)the provisions of Part 2G.2 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) that apply to members of a company and the provisions of the plaintiff’s constitution that are not inconsistent therewith,…

Continue reading Re Opus Group Limited

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Re Opus Group Limited [2018] FCA 959
Case
[2018] FCA 959
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Opus Group Limited applied to the Court for orders to convene a meeting of its shareholders to consider and vote on a proposed scheme of arrangement. The scheme proposed a redomiciliation of the company from Australia to Bermuda. The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) did not oppose the scheme. The Court was required to decide whether the scheme was bona fide and whether all necessary matters had been addressed for the meeting to be convened. The Court found that the scheme was bona fide and that all requirements for convening the meeting had been met.

The Court considered the scheme to be bona fide as it had the primary purpose of benefiting the company's shareholders and was not being used as a device to circumvent legal obligations. The Court also found that all relevant matters had been addressed, including the requirement for ASIC to have a reasonable opportunity to examine the terms of the proposed scheme. The Court was satisfied that the scheme was fair and reasonable to the shareholders, and that the notice and other procedural requirements had been met. Accordingly, the Court made the orders sought by Opus Group Limited, including convening the meeting, approving the scheme booklet for distribution, and allowing the conduct of the scheme meeting in accordance with the Corporations Act and the company's constitution. The Court also made orders regarding the notice of the meeting, the appointment of a chairperson, the conduct of voting, and the dispatch of the scheme booklet to shareholders.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. The plaintiff convene a meeting of holders of fully paid ordinary shares (Shares) in the capital of the plaintiff (Shareholders) as at 7pm AEST on 4 September 2018 for the purpose of considering and, if thought fit, approving (with or without amendment) the proposed scheme of arrangement (Scheme) which is Annexure C to the typeset version of the draft scheme booklet and explanatory statement, being Annexure ABVM-10 to the affidavit of Ana Brenda Valdez Martinez sworn and filed on 26 July 2018 (Scheme Booklet), and such meeting to be held at 11am AEST at Club Rivers, 32 Littleton Street, Riverwood, New South Wales on 6 September 2018 or such other date as the Court may approve (Scheme Meeting).

2. Subject to these orders, the Scheme Meeting is to be convened, held and conducted in accordance with:

(a) the provisions of Part 2G.2 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) that apply to members of a company and the provisions of the plaintiff’s constitution that are not inconsistent therewith, and that apply to meetings of members; and

(b) the notice of meeting in the form or to the effect of the notice contained in Annexure E of the Scheme Booklet.

3. Pursuant to section 1319 of the Corporations Act Rule 2.15 of the Federal Court (Corporations) Rules 2000 (Cth) shall not apply to the Scheme Meeting.

4. Mr Richard Francis Celarc or, failing him, Mr Paul Antony Young is to be appointed to act as chairperson of the Scheme Meeting (Chairperson) and report the result of the Scheme Meeting to this Court.

5. The Chairperson can adjourn the Scheme Meeting in his absolute discretion for such time that the Chairperson thinks appropriate, to a time and place to be advised by the Chairperson.

6. Two shareholders present in person or by proxy, corporate representative or attorney under power and entitled to vote shall constitute a quorum for the Scheme Meeting.

7. Voting on the resolution to approve the Scheme is to be conducted by way of poll.

8. At the Scheme Meeting each Shareholder present and entitled to vote, will be entitled to one vote for each fully paid ordinary share in the capital of the plaintiff that the Shareholder is registered as holding at 7pm AEST on 4 September 2018.

9. The Scheme Booklet, which contains an explanatory statement required by Section 412(1)(a) of the Corporations Act, be and is hereby approved subject to:

(a) correcting any minor typographical errors;

(b) any minor amendments required or approved by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) for registration under section 412(6) of the Corporations Act; and

(c) adopting any amendments approved by the Court.

10. Subject to registration of the Scheme Booklet with the ASIC pursuant to section 412(6) of the Corporations Act, the plaintiff is to dispatch the Scheme Booklet by no later than 6 August 2018, substantially in the form approved under order 9 above, together with a Proxy Form in respect of the Scheme Meeting, being substantially in the form of Annexure RFC-4 to the affidavit of Mr Richard Francis Celarc to the Shareholders who appear on the register of members on 6 August 2018:

(a) subject to paragraph (c) below, in the case of each Shareholder who has a registered address in Australia, by dispatching by pre-paid post, parcel post or courier;

(b) subject to paragraph (c) below, in the case of each Shareholder who has a registered address outside Australia, by dispatching by pre-paid airmail or air courier; and

(c) in the case of each Shareholder who has nominated an electronic address for the purpose of receiving notifications of notices of any meetings from Boardroom Pty Ltd, by sending an email containing a URL link to the Scheme Booklet and Proxy Form to the email address nominated by that Shareholder.

11. Dispatch of the documents referred to in paragraph 10 of these orders in accordance with their terms is to be taken to be sufficient notice of the Scheme Meeting.

12. The time by which Shareholders must return their proxy forms for the Scheme Meeting is 11:00am (AEST) on 4 September 2018.

13. Leave be given to the plaintiff to make application for orders under sections 411(4) and 411(6) of the Corporations Act following the Scheme Meeting for approval of the Scheme to be heard at 10:15am on Thursday, 13 September 2018 or such other date as the Court sees fit to set for such purpose.

14. The plaintiff is to give notice of the hearing of the application pursuant to section 411(4)(b) of the Corporations Act for orders approving the Scheme by publishing an advertisement in the public notices column of 'The Australian' and 'The Sydney Morning Herald' newspapers substantially in the form of Annexure A to these orders, such advertisement to be published on or before 4 September 2018 and the plaintiff otherwise be exempted from compliance with rule 3.4 of the Federal Court (Corporations) Rules.

15. There be liberty to apply upon the giving of 48 hours notice to ASIC.

16. An office copy of these orders shall be lodged with ASIC as soon as practicable after these orders are made.

Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.

Annexure A

OPUS GROUP LIMITED ACN 006 162 876

Notice of hearing to approve Scheme of Arrangement pursuant to section 411 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)

TO all the members of OPUS Group Limited (OPUS)

TAKE NOTICE that at 10:15am on 13 September 2018 the Federal Court of Australia at the Peter Durack Commonwealth Law Courts Building, 1 Victoria Avenue, PERTH WA will hear an application by OPUS seeking the approval of a scheme of arrangement between OPUS and its ordinary shareholders to be proposed by resolution at the meeting of its members to be held at 11:00am (AEST) on 6 September 2018 at Club Rivers, 32 Littleton Street, Riverwood, New South Wales.

If you wish to oppose the approval of the proposed scheme of arrangement, you must file and serve on OPUS a notice of appearance, in the prescribed form, together with any affidavit on which you wish to rely at the hearing. The notice of appearance and affidavit must be served on OPUS at its address for service at least 1 day before the date fixed for the hearing of the application.

The address for service of OPUS is c/- King & Wood Mallesons, Level 30, QV.1 Building, 250 St Georges Terrace, PERTH WA 6000.

King & Wood Mallesons, solicitors for OPUS, the plaintiff.

A copy of the scheme booklet is available from OPUS’s website at http://opusgroup.com.au/InvestorCentre/.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

ASIC confirmed in a letter dated 25 July 2018 addressed to OPUS that the requirement for prior notice of the hearing of the application under s 411(1) had been provided and that it had had a reasonable opportunity to examine the terms of the proposed scheme and draft explanatory statement. ASIC confirmed that it did not propose to appear to make submissions or intervene to oppose the scheme at the hearing.Conclusion For the reasons set out above I am satisfied that the proposed scheme is bona fide, that each of the matters relevant to an order convening a scheme meeting under s 411 was addressed, and that the matters referred to in para [13] above are otherwise satisfied. Accordingly, I considered it was appropriate to make the orders sought by OPUS, including those relating to the convening of the meeting, approving the scheme booklet for distribution and the conduct of the scheme meeting.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.