RE MONGER; EX PARTE ABB SERVICE PTY LTD [2002] WASC 299
| SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA | Citation No: | [2002] WASC 299 | |
| Case No: | CIV:1875/2000 | 22 NOVEMBER 2002 | |
| Coram: | ROBERTS-SMITH J | 22/11/02 | |
| 22 | Judgment Part: | 1 of 1 | |
| Result: | Application for order nisi for certiorari granted, Order nisi made returnable instanter, Application for order absolute refused, Order nisi discharged | ||
| A | |||
| PDF Version |
| Parties: | ABB SERVICE PTY LTD ENRIQUE MERINO |
Catchwords: | Workers compensation Prerogative writ Certiorari Decision of Director of Workers' Compensation Conciliation and Review Directorate to refer claim to Review Officer Whether s 87ZN(1) of the Workers' Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 1981 (WA) precludes prerogative review of Director's decision Time Delay Hearing before Review Officer imminent Whether order absolute should be refused on discretionary grounds |
Legislation: | Workers' Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 1981 (WA), s 87ZN(1) |
Case References: | Public Service Association of South Australia v Federated Clerks Union (1991) 173 CLR 132 Re City of Melville; Ex parte J-Corp Pty Ltd (1998) 20 WAR 72 Re Monger; Ex parte Dutch & Ors (2001) 25 WAR 96 Re Monger; Ex parte United Construction Pty Ltd [2002] WASCA 253 Re Monger; Ex parte Western Power Corporation [2000] WASC 271 Re Monger; Ex parte WMC Resources Ltd & Anor [2002] WASCA 129 Thorpe v Wanneroo City Council, unreported, Appeal No CM-49/2000 (Magistrate Cockram); Library No 1085; 1 December 2000 Bridge Shipping Pty Ltd v Grand Shipping SA (1991) 173 CLR 231 Chapman v Reilly, unreported; FCA (Neaves J); 9 December 1983 Doyle v Chief of Staff (1982) 42 ALR 283 Hickey v Australian Telecommunications Commission (1983) 47 ALR 517 Highway Hotel Pty Ltd & Ors v The City of Bunbury & Ors [2000] WASCA 421 Hockey v Yelland (1984) 157 CLR 124 Hunter Valley Developments Pty Ltd v Cohen (1984) 3 FCR 344 Lucic v Nolan (1982) 45 ALR 411 Queensland v JL Holdings Pty Ltd (1997) 189 CLR 146 Ralkon v Aboriginal Development Commission (1982) 43 ALR 535 Re Lands and Forest Commission & Anor; Ex parte South West Forests Defence Foundation, unreported; SCt of WA; Library No 930643; 25 November 1993 Re The City of Bunbury & Ors; Ex parte Highway Hotel Pty Ltd & Ors [2000] WASC 62 Re Western Australian Industrial Relations Commission; Ex parte Robe River Mining Company Pty Ltd (1992) 9 WAR 121 Wedesweiller v Cole (1983) 47 ALR 528 |
JURISDICTION : SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA
- IN CHAMBERS
ABB SERVICE PTY LTD
Applicant
Catchwords:
Workers compensation - Prerogative writ - Certiorari - Decision of Director of Workers' Compensation Conciliation and Review Directorate to refer claim to Review Officer - Whether…
Continue reading Re Monger
Sign in free to access the full text
Details
- AGLC
- Re Monger [2002] WASC 299
- Case
- [2002] WASC 299
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
ABB Service Pty Ltd sought a writ of certiorari to challenge the decision of the Director of the Workers' Compensation Conciliation and Review Directorate to accept an application for a determination of degree of disability and refer the matter to a Review Officer for resolution. The Director's decision was made in respect of Enrique Merino, who was employed by ABB Service Pty Ltd and had sustained an injury to his right shoulder in May 1997. The Director had accepted a Form 22 application and referred the matter to a Review Officer, but ABB Service Pty Ltd claimed that the medical evidence submitted by Mr Merino did not comply with statutory requirements and that the Director's decision was therefore invalid. The application for certiorari was filed in July 2000 but was not supported by affidavit until August 2001, and the matter did not come before the court until October 2001. The court was required to decide whether the Director's decision could be challenged by prerogative writ, and if so, whether the application was time-barred and whether an order absolute should be granted. The court held that the Director's decision was not immune from prerogative review and that the application was not time-barred. However, the court refused to grant an order absolute on the basis of the undue delay and the fact that the issue could be resolved by the Review Officer. The court granted an order nisi and discharged it, returning the matter to the Review Officer for determination of the validity of the Director's referral.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.