AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION TRIBUNAL
Lakes R Us Pty Ltd [2006] ACompT 3
ACCESS REGIME – refusal by designated Minister to declare a service – application to Australian Competition Tribunal for review of decision – review hearing dates fixed – application for leave to withdraw application for review – procedural power of Tribunal – application for leave to withdraw opposed – public interest – no effective contradictor – leave therefore granted.
Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) s 44K, s 44ZZP
Trade Practices Regulations 1974 reg 22, reg 26
Asia Pacific Transport Pty Ltd [2003] ATPR 41-920 cited
Re United Permanent Building Society Ltd (1976) 26 FLR 129 cited
Re Country Television Services Ltd (1984) 73 FLR 68 cited
Nursing Agencies Association of Australia (2003) ATPR 41-936 citedFile No 2 of 2006
RE: APPLICATION FOR REVIEW, PURSUANT TO SECTION 44K OF THE TRADE PRACTICES ACT 1974, OF THE DECISION BY THE ACTING NSW PREMIER TO NOT DECLARE WATER AND TRANSPORT SERVICES PROVIDED BY HYDRO LIMITED AND STATE WATER CORPORATION
BY: LAKES R US PTY LTD
FRENCH J (Deputy President)
31 MAY 2006
PERTH
AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION TRIBUNAL
No 2 OF 2006
RE:APPLICATION FOR REVIEW, PURSUANT TO SECTION 44K OF THE TRADE PRACTICES ACT 1974, OF THE DECISION BY THE ACTING NSW PREMIER TO NOT DECLARE WATER AND TRANSPORT SERVICES PROVIDED BY SNOWY HYDRO LIMITED AND STATE WATER CORPORATION
BY:LAKES R US PTY LTD
Applicant
THE TRIBUNAL:
FRENCH J (Deputy President)
DATE:
30 MAY 2006
WHERE MADE:
PERTH
THE TRIBUNAL DETERMINES THAT the applicant have leave to withdraw its application.
AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION TRIBUNAL
No 2 of 2006
RE:
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW, PURSUANT TO SECTION 44K OF THE TRADE PRACTICES ACT 1974, OF THE DECISION BY THE ACTING NSW PREMIER TO NOT DECLARE WATER AND TRANSPORT SERVICES PROVIDED BY SNOWY HYDRO LIMITED AND STATE WATER CORPORATION
BY:
LAKES R US PTY LTD
Applicant
THE TRIBUNAL:
FRENCH J (Deputy President)
DATE:
31 MAY 2006
PLACE:
PERTH
REASONS FOR RULING ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO WITHDRAW
Introduction
On 9 January 2006 the Acting Premier of New South Wales, decided, on the recommendation of the National Competition Council (NCC), not to declare, under Pt IIIA of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) (the Act), water storage and transport services provided by Snowy Hydro Ltd (Snowy Hydro) and the State Water Corporation (State Water). Lakes R Us Pty Ltd (Lakes R Us) which had applied for the declaration then applied to the Australian Competition Tribunal (the Tribunal) for review of the Minister’s decision.
Lakes R Us had difficulties in formulating its case and failed to comply with a Tribunal direction for the filing of witness statements. On 26 May 2006 the company applied for leave to withdraw its application.
For the reasons which follow, I will grant leave to Lakes R Us to withdraw its application. The time and money that has been wasted by parties involved in the application as well as the wasted time of the Tribunal is to be regretted. It may be…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Re Lakes R Us Pty Ltd and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2006] ACompT 3
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Australian Competition Tribunal found that it had the procedural power to grant leave for an applicant to withdraw its application for review. The Tribunal's power to do so was derived from s 103(1)(a) of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), which allows the Tribunal to conduct its proceedings with as little formality and technicality, and with as much expedition, as the requirements of the Act and a proper consideration of the matters before the Tribunal permit. The Tribunal also took into account the public interest in deciding whether to grant leave. In this case, the Tribunal concluded that it was in the public interest for Lakes R Us to be granted leave to withdraw its application because there was no effective contradictor, and proceeding with the case without a properly prepared applicant could lead to a decision uninformed by all relevant evidence and argument.
Accordingly, the Australian Competition Tribunal granted leave to Lakes R Us Pty Ltd to withdraw its application for review of the decision by the Acting Premier of New South Wales not to declare certain water and transport services provided by Snowy Hydro Ltd and State Water Corporation as designated services under Pt IIIA of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth).
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.