| IN THE SUPREME COURT OF VICTORIA | Not Restricted | |
AT MELBOURNE
COMMERCIAL COURT
CORPORATIONS LIST
No. S CI 1084 of 2014
IN THE MATTER OF
KEVIN McNAMARA & SON PTY LTD
(ACN 072 144 579)
BETWEEN:
KEVIN McNAMARA & SON PY LTD
| (ACN 072 144 579) | Plaintiff |
| v | |
| JOANNE VLAHOS | Defendant |
---
JUDGE: | ROBSON J | |
WHERE HELD: | Melbourne | |
DATE OF HEARING: | 16 April 2014 | |
DATE OF JUDGMENT | 18 July 2014 | |
CASE MAY BE CITED AS: | Re Kevin McNamara & Son Pty Ltd | |
MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION: | [2014] VSC 337 | |
- - -
CORPORATIONS – Winding up - Statutory notice – Application to set aside – Debt jointly due to husband and wife – Husband subsequently became an undischarged bankrupt – Notice for full amount of debt and signed by the wife alone – Whether statutory notice invalid – Whether wife able to give notice in respect of full amount – Effect of bankruptcy on joint debt – Whether s 62 of Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) applies to a statutory notice – Notice valid – Application dismissed – Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), s 62.
- - -
APPEARANCES: | Counsel | Solicitors |
| For the Plaintiff | P J Marzella | Ferraro & Company Pty Ltd |
| For the Defendant | C Ballantyne (as solicitor) | Madgwicks |
Cases referred to
115 Constitution Road Pty Ltd v Downey as trustee for NBD Systems (2008) 68 ACSR 118
Altarama Ltd v Camp (1980) 5 ACLR 513
Anvic Holdings Pty Ltd v Constable [2002] NSWSC 424
Clarke & Walker Pty Ltd v Thew (1967) 116 CLR 465
Createc Pty Ltd v Design Signs Pty Ltd (2009) 71 ASCR 602
Euphoric Pty Limited v Magar (aka Kamir Azir Magar) [2011] NSWSC 469
Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Everett (1980) 143 CLR 440
In the matter of theEstate of Nickolaos Zikos (Unreported, Supreme Court of Victoria, Nathan J, 31 March 1987)
McIntyre v Gye (1994) 51 FCR 472
Macks (trustee of the estate of Weber), Re Weber (bankrupt) (2006) 233 ALR 50, [24]
Manzo v 555/255 Pitt St Pty Ltd (1990) 21 NSWLR 1
Mibor Investments Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [1994] 2 VR 290
Norman v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1963) 109 CLR 9
Official Trustee in Bankruptcy, in the matter of Shaw [1999] FCA 968
Page v McKensey [2008] NSWSC 147
Randall Pty Ltd v Chepan Pty Ltd [2009] NSWSC 783
Re A & K Holdings Pty Ltd [1964] VR 257
Re Australia Seiwa Pty Ltd [2012] NSWSC 1334
Re Francis; Ex parte Official Trustee in Bankruptcy (1988) 19 FCR 149
Re Oswald and Oswald; Ex parte The Official Trustee in Bankruptcy (1985) 11 FCR 276,
Roberts v Wayne Roberts Concrete Constructions Pty Ltd [2004] NSWSC 734
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Re Kevin McNamara and Son Pty Ltd and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2014] VSC 337
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court considered the statutory framework, particularly the provisions of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth). It found that the statutory notice was valid as it was issued by one of the joint creditors, Mrs McNamara, for the full amount of the debt. The court held that the wife had the right to give notice for the full amount of the debt despite her husband's bankruptcy, as the debt was not solely attributable to him under section 62 of the Bankruptcy Act. The court also found that the bankruptcy of the husband did not affect the validity of the statutory notice issued by the wife. The application to set aside the statutory notice was dismissed.
The final orders of the court dismissed the petitioner's application to set aside the statutory notice, confirming that Mrs McNamara's statutory notice was validly issued and the winding-up application could proceed. The court's decision clarified the position of creditors in joint debt scenarios and the effect of bankruptcy on the ability of one creditor to issue a statutory notice.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.