Re JRP

Case [2022] QSC 33


SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND

CITATION:

Re JRP [2022] QSC 33

PARTIES:

COMMISSIONER OF POLICE (QLD)

(Applicant)

v
JRP

(Respondent)

FILE NO/S:

SCR No 131 of 2022

DIVISION:

Trial Division

PROCEEDING:

Application

ORIGINATING COURT:

Supreme Court of Queensland at Cairns

DELIVERED ON:

10 March 2022

DELIVERED AT:

Townsville

HEARING DATES:

10, 11, 21 February, 2022

JUDGE:

North J

ORDER:

1.   The order issued in the Townsville Childrens Court on 8 February 2022 granting bail to the child be revoked.

2. A warrant issue for the apprehension of the child pursuant to 19D Bail Act 1980 (Qld) to appear before the Childrens Court at Townsville; and

3.   That child be remanded in custody.

CATCHWORDS:

CRIMINAL LAW – PROCEDURE – BAIL – REVOCATION, VARIATION, REVIEW AND APPEAL – where Police Prosecutions applied pursuant to s 19B(2) Bail Act 1980 (Qld) for a review of a Magistrate’s decision to grant the respondent bail – where the charges for which the respondent was granted bail included enter a dwelling and commit an indictable offence and unlawful use of a motor vehicle – where the alleged offending involved breaking into a residential property and the unlawful use of a vehicle stolen from this property – where the respondent is a juvenile – where the respondent had a significant criminal history – where the respondent was on bail for periods of the alleged offending – whether burglary and unlawful use of motor vehicles by juveniles endangers the safety of the community – whether if released there is an unacceptable risk that the child will commit an offence that endangers the safety of the community – whether it is not practicable to adequately mitigate that risk by imposing particular conditions – whether the bail granted to the respondent should be revoked

Bail Act 1980 (Qld), s 14B, s 19B

Youth Justice Act 1992 (Qld), s 47AF, s 48, s 48A, s 48AA(4)(b), s 48AAA, s 48AE

COUNSEL:

K Read for the Applicant

K Koelmeyer for the Respondent
K Coffison for Youth Justice

SOLICITORS:

Townsville Prosecution Services for the Applicant

Legal Aid Queensland for the Respondent

  1. The respondent is 15 years of age and comes from a disadvantaged indigenous background.

  2. He has a long and concerning history of offending.[1]  A summary of the most relevant convictions or court proceedings found in Exhibit 7 is set out in the outline of submissions on behalf of the applicant[2] the summary is:

    [1]     See 10 page history, Exhibit 7 to the Affidavit of Erin Collis filed 9 February 2022.

    [2]     MFI 1 at para 32.

    “     a.    He has multiple entries pertaining to violent offending. These include:

    i.Robbery with actual violence/in company dated 26/01/2019; and

    ii.Threatening violence by words or conduct dated 05/01/2019.

    b.Most concerningly, he has a prior conviction for dangerous operation of motor vehicle causing grievous bodily harm dated 10/04/2019.

    c.He has significant number of prior convictions for property related offences and offences involving the unlawful use of motor vehicles. These include:

    i.12 convictions for enter premises and commit indictable…

Continue reading Re JRP

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Re JRP [2022] QSC 33
Case
[2022] QSC 33
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Police Prosecutions applied for a review of a decision by a Magistrate to grant bail to the respondent, a juvenile with a significant criminal history, who was on bail for charges including entering a dwelling and committing an indictable offence, and unlawful use of a motor vehicle. The alleged offending involved breaking into a residential property and using a stolen vehicle from this property. The court had to decide if the bail granted to the respondent should be revoked.

The court considered whether the respondent’s bail endangered the safety of the community, if there was an unacceptable risk that the child would commit an offence that endangered the safety of the community, and if it was not practicable to mitigate that risk by imposing particular conditions. The court found that the nature and seriousness of the alleged offending, coupled with the respondent’s significant criminal history, justified a finding that the respondent endangered the safety of the community. The court also found that it was not practicable to adequately mitigate the risk by imposing particular conditions.

The order issued in the Townsville Children’s Court on 8 February 2022 granting bail to the child was revoked. A warrant was issued for the apprehension of the child to appear before the Children’s Court at Townsville, and the child was remanded in custody.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. The order issued in the Townsville Childrens Court on 8 February 2022 granting bail to the child be revoked.

2. A warrant issue for the apprehension of the child pursuant to 19D Bail Act 1980 (Qld) to appear before the Childrens Court at Townsville; and

3. That child be remanded in custody.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.