CHILDRENS COURT OF QUEENSLAND
| CITATION: | Re JG [2023] QChC 3 |
| IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR BAIL BY JG | |
| PARTIES: | JG |
| (applicant) (anonymised) | |
| v | |
| DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS (QLD) | |
| (respondent) | |
| FILE NO: | 105 of 2022 |
| DIVISION: | Criminal |
| PROCEEDING: | Bail Application |
| ORIGINATING | Childrens Court of Queensland |
| COURT: | |
| DELIVERED ON: | 2 February 2023 (delivered ex tempore) |
| DELIVERED AT: | Cairns |
| HEARING DATE: | 2 February 2023 |
| JUDGE: | Fantin DCJ |
| ORDERS: | 1. Application for bail allowed. |
| 2. Bail granted in terms of the conditional bail program. | |
CATCHWORDS: | CRIMINAL LAW – PROCEDURE – APPLICATION FOR BAIL – where applicant pleaded guilty to 12 offences including robbery in company with personal violence – where sentence |
| adjourned to obtain presentence report and psychological report | |
| – where applicant applies for bail pending sentence – where | |
| applicant a 15 year old child with no criminal history at time of | |
| offending – diagnoses of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity | |
| Disorder and possible Foetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder and | |
| Attachment Disorder – conditions in detention – access to education – time confined in cell – Schedule 1 Charter of Youth Justice Principles – whether unacceptable risk of reoffending – whether practicable to adequately mitigate risk | |
| by bail conditions | |
| LEGISLATION: | Youth Justice Act 1992 (Qld) s 48(2), s 48AAA(2), s |
| 48AAA(3), s 48AA(3), s 48AA(4)(a), Schedule 1 | |
| COUNSEL: | J Sheridan for the applicant. B Wilde (solicitor) for the respondent. |
| SOLICITORS: | Northern Plateau Legal for the applicant. Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions for the respondent. Department of Children, Youth Justice and Multicultural Affairs. |
FANTIN DCJ: The applicant child applies for bail, having been charged with 12 separate offences. There are two offences on indictment: a robbery in company with personal violence, on indictment 105 of 2022; and an assault occasioning bodily harm, in company, on an ex-officio indictment presented today. In addition, there are 10 summary charges. They are two charges of wilful damage by graffiti, one charge of common assault, one charge of possess dangerous drugs (cannabis), one charge of stealing, one charge of attempted stealing, one charge of contravene direction or requirement of police, one charge of failure to appear in accordance with undertaking, one charge of unlawful use of a motor vehicle, and one charge of receiving tainted property.
The application for bail is opposed by the Crown.
The applicant child was 15 years old at the time of the offending and, later, 16 years of age. The circumstances of the offending are summarised in an agreed schedule of facts, which became exhibit 2.
It is necessary to summarise the procedural history of the matter. On the 7th of November 2022, an indictment was presented, charging the child with a single count of robbery in company with personal violence. On 28 November 2022, the matter was
listed for sentence on 2 February 2023, today’s date. No pre-sentence report order was made. On today’s date, the date of the sentence, I was informed that the Crown was
presenting an ex-officio indictment for the offence of assault occasioning bodily harm
in company…
Continue reading Re JG
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Re JG [2023] QChC 3
- Case
- [2023] QChC 3
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to balance the interests of the applicant, who sought bail, against the interests of the community, which necessitated a consideration of the seriousness of the offences, the risk of reoffending, and any other relevant factors. The court acknowledged the gravity of the offences but also considered the applicant's background, their cooperation with the authorities, and the prospect of a custodial sentence. The court also took into account the principle that a person is presumed innocent until proven guilty and the potential impact of a prolonged period of remand on the applicant.
In allowing the application for bail, the court emphasised that the applicant had a right to be considered for bail unless there were compelling reasons to the contrary. The court found that the applicant's cooperation and the prospects of a non-custodial sentence were significant factors in favour of bail. The court also considered that the applicant had not posed a risk of reoffending if released on appropriate conditions. The court ordered that the applicant be released on bail subject to a range of conditions designed to ensure their appearance at court and to protect the community.
The court ordered that the applicant be released on bail, subject to the conditions specified in the judgment. These conditions included a requirement to reside at a specified address, to report to a bail justice on a regular basis, and to refrain from contact with certain individuals. The applicant was also required to surrender their passport and to comply with a curfew.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. Application for bail allowed.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.