Re JG

Case [2023] QChC 3


CHILDRENS COURT OF QUEENSLAND

CITATION:  Re JG [2023] QChC 3
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR BAIL
BY JG
PARTIES:  JG
(applicant) (anonymised)
v
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS (QLD)
(respondent)
FILE NO:  105 of 2022
DIVISION:  Criminal
PROCEEDING:  Bail Application
ORIGINATING  Childrens Court of Queensland
COURT: 
DELIVERED ON:  2 February 2023 (delivered ex tempore)
DELIVERED AT:  Cairns
HEARING DATE:  2 February 2023
JUDGE:  Fantin DCJ
ORDERS:  1. Application for bail allowed.
2. Bail granted in terms of the conditional bail program.

CATCHWORDS: 

CRIMINAL LAW – PROCEDURE – APPLICATION FOR BAIL – where applicant pleaded guilty to 12 offences including robbery in company with personal violence – where sentence

adjourned to obtain presentence report and psychological report
– where applicant applies for bail pending sentence – where
applicant a 15 year old child with no criminal history at time of
offending – diagnoses of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity
Disorder and possible Foetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder and

Attachment Disorder – conditions in detention – access to education – time confined in cell – Schedule 1 Charter of Youth Justice Principles – whether unacceptable risk of reoffending – whether practicable to adequately mitigate risk

by bail conditions
LEGISLATION:  Youth Justice Act 1992 (Qld) s 48(2), s 48AAA(2), s
48AAA(3), s 48AA(3), s 48AA(4)(a), Schedule 1
COUNSEL:  J Sheridan for the applicant.
B Wilde (solicitor) for the respondent.
SOLICITORS:  Northern Plateau Legal for the applicant.
Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions for the
respondent.
Department of Children, Youth Justice and Multicultural
Affairs.

FANTIN DCJ: The applicant child applies for bail, having been charged with 12 separate offences. There are two offences on indictment: a robbery in company with personal violence, on indictment 105 of 2022; and an assault occasioning bodily harm, in company, on an ex-officio indictment presented today. In addition, there are 10 summary charges. They are two charges of wilful damage by graffiti, one charge of common assault, one charge of possess dangerous drugs (cannabis), one charge of stealing, one charge of attempted stealing, one charge of contravene direction or requirement of police, one charge of failure to appear in accordance with undertaking, one charge of unlawful use of a motor vehicle, and one charge of receiving tainted property.

The application for bail is opposed by the Crown.

The applicant child was 15 years old at the time of the offending and, later, 16 years of age. The circumstances of the offending are summarised in an agreed schedule of facts, which became exhibit 2.

It is necessary to summarise the procedural history of the matter. On the 7th of November 2022, an indictment was presented, charging the child with a single count of robbery in company with personal violence. On 28 November 2022, the matter was

listed for sentence on 2 February 2023, today’s date. No pre-sentence report order was made. On today’s date, the date of the sentence, I was informed that the Crown was

presenting an ex-officio indictment for the offence of assault occasioning bodily harm
in company…

Continue reading Re JG

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Re JG [2023] QChC 3
Case
[2023] QChC 3
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter before the court was an application for bail made by a person who had pleaded guilty to a series of offences, including robbery in company with personal violence. The case was heard by the Supreme Court of Queensland. The applicant sought bail pending the determination of their sentence. The prosecution opposed the application on the basis of the seriousness of the offences and the risk of reoffending if released on bail.

The court was required to balance the interests of the applicant, who sought bail, against the interests of the community, which necessitated a consideration of the seriousness of the offences, the risk of reoffending, and any other relevant factors. The court acknowledged the gravity of the offences but also considered the applicant's background, their cooperation with the authorities, and the prospect of a custodial sentence. The court also took into account the principle that a person is presumed innocent until proven guilty and the potential impact of a prolonged period of remand on the applicant.

In allowing the application for bail, the court emphasised that the applicant had a right to be considered for bail unless there were compelling reasons to the contrary. The court found that the applicant's cooperation and the prospects of a non-custodial sentence were significant factors in favour of bail. The court also considered that the applicant had not posed a risk of reoffending if released on appropriate conditions. The court ordered that the applicant be released on bail subject to a range of conditions designed to ensure their appearance at court and to protect the community.

The court ordered that the applicant be released on bail, subject to the conditions specified in the judgment. These conditions included a requirement to reside at a specified address, to report to a bail justice on a regular basis, and to refrain from contact with certain individuals. The applicant was also required to surrender their passport and to comply with a curfew.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. Application for bail allowed.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.