FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BANKRUPTCY - Sequestration - ability to pay debts - whether alleged ability to borrow against other causes of action makes debtor solvent - whether sufficient validity in claims - whether real claims with any likelihood of success- debtor refusing to so borrow in any event
BANKRUPTCY - Sequestration - Whether other sufficient cause to dismiss petition within meaning of s52 (2) (b) - whether claim against the creditor of sufficient validity to justify dismissal or adjournment of petition
Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) s 52(1) & (2)
Trojan v Corporation of Hindmarsh (1987) 16 FCR 37 (Applied)
Re Stubberfield; Ex parte Paradise Grove Pty Ltd (1995) 134 ALR 169 (Applied)
Re James; Ex parte Carter Holt Harvey Roofing (Australia) Pty Ltd (No 2) (1994) 51 FCR 14(Applied)
Re Schmidt; Ex parte Anglewood Pty Ltd (1968) 13 FLR 111 (Applied)
Re Sarina; Ex parte Council of the Shire of Wollondilly (1980) 43 FLR 163 (Considered)
Re Kostezky; Ex parte Milder Elfman Szmerling Krycer Pty Ltd (1996) 67 FCR 101(Applied)
Sandell v Porter (1966) 115 CLR 666 (Applied)
Cain v Whyte (1933) 48 CLR 639 (Applied)
RE ELWYN JOHN CAPEL (Debtor): Ex parte CARAM FINANCE AUSTRALIA LIMITED (FORMERLY CALLED MARAC FINANCE AUSTRALIA LIMITED) ACN 000 098 402 (Creditor)
QG 7299 of 1997
FINN J
BRISBANE
9 APRIL 1998
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY
QG 7299 of 1997
RE:
ELWYN JOHN CAPEL
DEBTOREX PARTE:
CARAM FINANCE AUSTRALIA LIMITED (FORMERLY CALLED MARAC FINANCE AUSTRALIA LIMITED)
ACN 000 098 402
CREDITORJUDGE:
FINN J
DATE OF ORDER:
9 APRIL 1998
WHERE MADE:
BRISBANE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The estate of the debtor be sequestrated.
2.The Petitioning Creditor’s costs, including any reserved costs be taxed and paid in accordance with the Bankruptcy Act 1966.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY
QG 7299 of 1997
RE:
ELWYN JOHN CAPEL
DEBTOREX PARTE:
CARAM FINANCE AUSTRALIA LIMITED (FORMERLY CALLED MARAC FINANCE AUSTRALIA LIMITED)
ACN 000 098 402
CREDITOR
JUDGE:
FINN J
DATE:
9 APRIL 1998
PLACE:
BRISBANE
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
The path of resistance taken by the judgment debtor, Elwyn John Capel, to the petition of Caram Finance Australia Ltd (“Caram”) for a sequestration order, can at best be described as surprising. Mr Capel has conceded that the requirements of s 52(1) of the Bankruptcy Act, 1966 (Cth) (“the Act”) are satisfied. He nonetheless contends that I should dismiss the petition under s 52(2) of the Act because “he ... is able to pay his ... debts” and/or because “for other sufficient cause a sequestration order ought not to be made”. I should add that Mr Capel has conducted his own defence of this proceeding.
For the sake of completeness I should also add that I gave leave to Ms Heather Langston, a creditor of Mr Capel who shares accommodation and is in a relationship…
Continue reading Re Capel, Elwyn John
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Re Capel, Elwyn John [1998] FCA 372
- Case
- [1998] FCA 372
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court needed to determine whether Capel's alleged ability to borrow against other causes of action made him solvent, and if those claims were of sufficient validity and likelihood of success to warrant dismissal or adjournment of the petition. Additionally, the court had to assess whether there was other sufficient cause to dismiss the petition under the mentioned section of the Act.
The court found that the claims Capel intended to borrow against were not of sufficient validity or likelihood of success to support his argument against sequestration. Capel's refusal to borrow against these claims, despite their potential to make him solvent, was also noted. The court concluded that there was no other sufficient cause to dismiss the petition under section 52(2)(b). Consequently, the court ordered the sequestration of Capel's estate and directed that the petitioner's costs, including any reserved costs, be taxed and paid in accordance with the Bankruptcy Act 1966.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The estate of the debtor be sequestrated.
2. The Petitioning Creditor’s costs, including any reserved costs be taxed and paid in accordance with the Bankruptcy Act 1966.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.