Re Beckwith

Case [1993] FCA 447

IAN REGINALD BECKWITH v. POWER and POWER (A firm)
B.N. No. 190 of 1992
Creditor's Petition No. 633 of 1992
FED No. 447
Number of pages - 22
Bankruptcy
(1993) 43 FCR 256

COURT

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA


BANKRUPTCY DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF QUEENSLAND
GENERAL DIVISION
Cooper J(1)
CATCHWORDS

Bankruptcy - creditor's petition - bankruptcy notice - application to set aside bankruptcy notice - application for summary judgment in Magistrates Court - judgment entered - application to set aside judgment dismissed - whether or not the Court will go behind the judgment - whether there was an adjudication on the merits - whether in truth and reality there was a debt due by the judgment debtor to the petitioning creditor - considerations - adequacy of the bill of costs - joint and several liability of company directors under s.592 Corporations Law.

Costs Act 1867 (Qld.) s.8, s.22, s.229

Corporations Law s.460, s.592, s.592(1)(b)(i), s.592(1)(b)(ii)

Corney v. Brien (1951) 84 CLR 343

Wren v. Mahoney (1972) 126 CLR 212

Re V. and J. Removals Ex parte Earl (BN 963 of 1985, Pincus J, Unreported 21.6.85)

Re David Ex parte Lahood (1979) 27 ALR 306

Petrie v. Redmond (1942) 13 ABC 44

Re Vojnovski (1970) ALR 355

Olivieri v. Stafford (1989) 24 FCR 413

Currie and Ors. v. Robinson (1968) QWN 25

Re Flower and Hart's Bill of Costs (1991) 2 QdR 20

Re Walsh Halligan Douglas' Bill of Costs (1990) 1 QdR 288

Coburn v. Colledge (1897) 1 QB 702

In Re Lawler (1878) 4 VLR 8 (IP and M)

Rema Industries and Services Pty. Ltd. v. Coad (1992) 10 ACLC 530

Taylor v. Darke (1992) 10 ACLC 1516

Hussein v. Good (1990) 8 ACLC 390

Group Four Industries Pty. Ltd. v. Brosnan (1991) 9 ACLC 1,181

Martin v. Hogan (1917) 24 CLR 234

Plaimar Ltd. v. Waters Trading Co. Ltd. (1945) 72 CLR 304

Minister for Supply and Development v. Servicemen's Co-Operative Joinery Manufacturers Ltd. (1957) 82 CLR 621

Hawkins v. Bank of China (1992) 10 ACLC 588

Russell Halpern Nominees Pty. Ltd. v. Martin (1986) 4 ACLC 393

Shapowloff v. Dunn (1981) 148 CLR 72

Re Walsh Ex parte Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (1982) 42 ALR 727

Sherry's Case (1884) 25 ChD 692

Deeley v. Lloyds Bank (1912) AC 756

HEARING

BRISBANE, 27 July 1992

#DATE 7:7:1993

Solicitors for the Applicant: Mr. P. Hackett of Stokes and

Panettiere

Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. Paul Howard

Solicitors for the Respondent: Power and Power

ORDER

The Court orders that:

1. The petition is dismissed.

2. The bankruptcy notice issued on 17 February, 1992 be set aside.

3. The petitioning creditor to pay the judgment debtor's costs of and incidental to the petition and the application to set aside the bankruptcy notice to be taxed if not agreed.

Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 124 of the Bankruptcy Rules.

JUDGE1

COOPER J On 28 February, 1992 the judgment debtor, who was then acting on…

Continue reading Re Beckwith

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Re Beckwith [1993] FCA 447
Case
[1993] FCA 447
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter of Re Beckwith involved a creditor's petition for bankruptcy against a debtor, following the issuance of a bankruptcy notice. The dispute reached the Magistrates Court where the debtor applied to set aside the bankruptcy notice and subsequently sought summary judgment against the petitioning creditor. The court was tasked with determining the validity of the bankruptcy notice, the appropriateness of setting aside the judgment, and the adequacy of the costs claimed by the creditor. The court also needed to consider whether the judgment had been entered on the merits and whether there was a genuine debt owed by the debtor to the creditor.

The court examined the circumstances surrounding the issuance of the bankruptcy notice and the subsequent proceedings. It was crucial to determine whether the court should look behind the judgment to assess the merits of the case. The court held that it could indeed consider whether there was a debt due by the debtor to the creditor in truth and reality. Additionally, the court evaluated the sufficiency of the costs claimed by the creditor and the joint and several liability of the company directors under section 592 of the Corporations Law.

Ultimately, the court dismissed the petition and set aside the bankruptcy notice issued on 17 February 1992. It further ordered that the petitioning creditor pay the debtor's costs of and incidental to the petition and the application to set aside the bankruptcy notice, with costs to be taxed if not agreed. The court's decision underscored the importance of ensuring that any bankruptcy proceedings are valid and that creditors are held accountable for their actions.

The court's final orders included dismissing the petition, setting aside the bankruptcy notice, and directing the petitioning creditor to pay the debtor's costs. These orders were intended to ensure that the debtor's rights were protected and that the creditor was held responsible for the consequences of the proceedings.

Orders

Orders of the court

The Court orders that:

1. The petition is dismissed.

2. The bankruptcy notice issued on 17 February, 1992 be set aside.

3. The petitioning creditor to pay the judgment debtor's costs of and incidental to the petition and the application to set aside the bankruptcy notice to be taxed if not agreed.

Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 124 of the Bankruptcy Rules.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.