Re Ausam Resources Ltd

Case [2004] FCA 823


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Ausam Resources Limited  ABN 12 090 935 738 [2004] FCA 823

CORPORATIONS – scheme of arrangement – application for order for convening of shareholders’ meetings – possible benefits and risks – matter for consideration by shareholders – order for shareholders’ meeting made – Board resolutions relating to proposed scheme of arrangement – number of Australian resident directors less than statutory minimum – application for validation of resolutions – contravention outside control of company – validation order made

Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 201A, subs 1322(4), subs 1322(6)

Re Continental Pacific Insurance Co [2002] NSWSC 789 cited

AUSAM RESOURCES LIMITED (ABN  12 090 935 738)
W94 OF 2004

FRENCH J
26 MAY 2004
PERTH


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY

W94 OF 2004

In the matter of Section 411(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)

IN THE MATTER of AUSAM RESOURCES LIMITED
ABN 12 090 935 738

AUSAM RESOURCES LIMITED
ABN 12 090 935 738
Plaintiff

JUDGE:

FRENCH J

DATE OF ORDER:

26 MAY 2004

WHERE MADE:

PERTH

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.Pursuant to s1322(4)(a) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act), that the resolutions passed by the Plaintiff’s board of directors on:

(a)16 April 2004; and

(b)10 May 2004,

be declared valid subject to the Plaintiff filing by close of business tomorrow an affidavit verifying the relationship of all resolutions passed on 16 April 2004 to the proposed scheme.

2.Pursuant to s 411(1) of the Corporations Act, that a meeting of shareholders of the Plaintiff (Court-ordered meeting) be convened for the purpose of considering, and if thought fit approving (with or without modification), the scheme of arrangement between the Plaintiff and its shareholders referred to in par 4 of the affidavit of Anthony Orum Sheppard, sworn on 10 May 2001 (1st Sheppard Affidavit).

3.Pursuant to s 411(1) of the Corporations Act, that:

(a)the Draft Scheme Booklet (Scheme Booklet) in Annexure AOS 11 to the affidavit of Anthony Orum Sheppard, sworn on 20 May 2004 (containing the explanatory statement required by s 412(1) of the Corporations Act and to be sent with the notice of meeting and proxy appointment form for the Court-ordered meeting); and

(b)the changes to the Scheme Booklet in Annexure AOS 13 to the affidavit of Anthony Orum Sheppard, sworn on 26 May 2004 (4th Sheppard Affidavit),

be approved.

4.The Court-ordered meeting take place at Royal Perth Yacht Club, Australia II Drive, Crawley, Western Australia 2009, on 21 June 2004 at 11 am (Perth time).

5.The notice of meeting and the proxy appointment form in Annexure AOS 2 to the 1st Sheppard Affidavit as changed by Annexure AOS 14 to the 4th Sheppard Affidavit are approved as the notice of meeting and proxy appointment form for the Court-ordered meeting.

6.Mark Galbreath Avery or failing him Richard Gano Lummis be appointed and act as Chairman of the Court-ordered meeting.

7.The Scheme Booklet and the notice of meeting and proxy appointment form for…

Continue reading Re Ausam Resources Ltd

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Re Ausam Resources Ltd [2004] FCA 823
Case
[2004] FCA 823
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter before the Court involved Ausam Resources Ltd, a company seeking to implement a scheme of arrangement with its shareholders. The dispute centred on the validity of certain resolutions passed by the company's board and the need for a court-ordered meeting to approve the proposed scheme. The legal issues before the Court involved determining whether the resolutions passed by the board on specified dates were valid and whether a meeting of shareholders should be convened to consider and approve the scheme of arrangement.

The Court found that the resolutions passed by the board were valid, subject to the company filing an affidavit verifying the relationship of the resolutions to the proposed scheme. The Court also found that a meeting of shareholders should be convened to consider and potentially approve the scheme of arrangement. The Court further approved the Draft Scheme Booklet and the changes to it, as well as the notice of meeting and proxy appointment form for the Court-ordered meeting. The Court ordered the meeting to take place on a specified date and time, and directed the company to dispatch the necessary documents to its shareholders and advertise the meeting in specified newspapers.

In summary, the Court declared the resolutions passed by the company's board to be valid, subject to the filing of an affidavit. The Court ordered a meeting of shareholders to be convened to consider and potentially approve the scheme of arrangement, and directed the company to take certain steps to inform its shareholders of the meeting and to advertise it in specified newspapers. The Court also approved the Draft Scheme Booklet and the notice of meeting and proxy appointment form for the Court-ordered meeting.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. Pursuant to s1322(4)(a) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act), that the resolutions passed by the Plaintiff’s board of directors on:

(a) 16 April 2004; and

(b) 10 May 2004,

be declared valid subject to the Plaintiff filing by close of business tomorrow an affidavit verifying the relationship of all resolutions passed on 16 April 2004 to the proposed scheme.

2. Pursuant to s 411(1) of the Corporations Act, that a meeting of shareholders of the Plaintiff (Court-ordered meeting) be convened for the purpose of considering, and if thought fit approving (with or without modification), the scheme of arrangement between the Plaintiff and its shareholders referred to in par 4 of the affidavit of Anthony Orum Sheppard, sworn on 10 May 2001 (1st Sheppard Affidavit).

3. Pursuant to s 411(1) of the Corporations Act, that:

(a) the Draft Scheme Booklet (Scheme Booklet) in Annexure AOS 11 to the affidavit of Anthony Orum Sheppard, sworn on 20 May 2004 (containing the explanatory statement required by s 412(1) of the Corporations Act and to be sent with the notice of meeting and proxy appointment form for the Court-ordered meeting); and

(b) the changes to the Scheme Booklet in Annexure AOS 13 to the affidavit of Anthony Orum Sheppard, sworn on 26 May 2004 (4th Sheppard Affidavit),

be approved.

4. The Court-ordered meeting take place at Royal Perth Yacht Club, Australia II Drive, Crawley, Western Australia 2009, on 21 June 2004 at 11 am (Perth time).

5. The notice of meeting and the proxy appointment form in Annexure AOS 2 to the 1st Sheppard Affidavit as changed by Annexure AOS 14 to the 4th Sheppard Affidavit are approved as the notice of meeting and proxy appointment form for the Court-ordered meeting.

6. Mark Galbreath Avery or failing him Richard Gano Lummis be appointed and act as Chairman of the Court-ordered meeting.

7. The Scheme Booklet and the notice of meeting and proxy appointment form for the Court-ordered meeting be dispatched to the shareholders of the Plaintiff by courier.

8. The Court-ordered meeting be advertised by the Plaintiff publishing a notice in the following newspapers on or before 7 June 2004:

(a) The West Australian daily newspaper; and

(b) The Australian daily newspaper.

9. The Plaintiff inform the Court of the outcome of the Court-ordered meeting by filing an affidavit on or before 22 June 2004.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

FRENCH J

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Established by: FRENCH J

Full text does not contain this section.