R v Youseff

Case [2012] NSWDC 252


District Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: R v Youseff [2012] NSWDC 252
Hearing dates:25, 26 October 2012
Decision date: 26 October 2012
Before: Neilson DCJ
Decision:

Wound with intent to cause grievous bodily harm

Sentenced to 6 years and 9 months imprisonment with a non-parole period of 4 years.

Finding of special circumstances and matter on Form 1 taken into account.

Specially aggravated kidnapping

Sentenced to 6 years and 9 months imprisonment with a non-parole period of 4 years.

Finding of special circumstances.

Sentences partially accumulated, with a total head sentence of 7 years and 3 months and a total non-parole period of 4 years and 6 months.

Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - sentence - wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm - specially aggravated kidnapping - detain victim for advantage (a psychological gain) whilst in company and occasioning actual bodily harm
Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 ss 33(1)(a), 86(3)
Cases Cited: Ayoub and El Masri v R [2000] NSWCCA 196
R v Speechley [2012] NSWCCA 130
Category:Sentence
Parties: Regina (Crown)
Nada Vanja Youseff (Offender)
Representation: Mr J Sfinas (Crown)
Mr A Barber (Offender)
File Number(s):2011/076478

Judgment

  1. Nada Vanja Youseff stands for sentence as a consequence of adhering to two pleas of guilty entered at the earliest available opportunity in the Local Court. The first charge was that on 8 March 2011 at Kingsgrove she did wound Robin McKivatt in an attempt to cause her grievous bodily harm. That is an offence contrary to s 33(1)(a) of the Crimes Act 1900. It is a very serious offence. The maximum penalty is imprisonment for twenty-five years. There is a standard non-parole period of seven years.

  1. The court attendance notice for the second offence is one of the most poorly drawn documents that I have seen. With the necessary corrections, the charge was that on 8 March 2011 at Kingsgrove the offender did, without consent, detain Robin McKivatt with the intention of obtaining an advantage, to wit a [psychological] gain, the said Robin McKivatt [having had] occasioned actual bodily harm [to her] during and after being detained, while the said [Nada Vanja Youseff] was in the company of Ali Charbaju. That is an offence contrary to s 86(3) of the Crimes Act 1900. The offence can be shortly described as specially aggravated kidnapping. Again, it is a most serious offence. Parliament has prescribed a maximum penalty of twenty-five years imprisonment. No standard non-parole period has been fixed.

  1. In addition, the offender asks me to take into account on a Form 1 in connection with the crime of wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm an offence of causing another to take an intoxicating substance. That is alleged to have occurred at the same place and on the same date. That again is a crime which carries a maximum penalty of twenty-five years imprisonment.

  1. The facts of the case are disturbing. The victim, Mrs Robin McKivatt, was at the time of the offences fifty-three years old. At…

Continue reading R v Youseff

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
R v Youseff [2012] NSWDC 252
Case
[2012] NSWDC 252
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of R v Youseff, the defendant was convicted of wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm and specially aggravated kidnapping. The facts leading to these charges involved the defendant detaining a victim with the intent to gain a psychological advantage, during which he also caused actual bodily harm. The case was heard in an Australian court of criminal jurisdiction.

The primary legal issues before the court involved the interpretation and application of sentencing principles under the relevant criminal statutes. Specifically, the court had to determine the appropriate sentence for each offence, taking into account any aggravating factors, and whether the sentences could be cumulative or should be served concurrently. The court also needed to consider the defendant's culpability and the nature of the harm inflicted on the victim.

In delivering the judgment, the court meticulously reviewed the evidence and submissions from both parties. The court acknowledged the severity of the offences, noting the psychological torment and physical harm inflicted on the victim. The court found that the defendant's actions warranted a significant custodial sentence. The court imposed a sentence of 6 years and 9 months imprisonment for the wounding offence, with a non-parole period of 4 years, and similarly for the specially aggravated kidnapping offence. The sentences were partially cumulative, resulting in a total head sentence of 7 years and 3 months and a non-parole period of 4 years and 6 months. The court also took into account special circumstances and matters on Form 1 in its sentencing decision.

The final orders of the court mandated the defendant to serve a total effective sentence of 7 years and 3 months imprisonment, with a non-parole period of 4 years and 6 months. The sentences for both the wounding and the kidnapping were to be partially cumulative, reflecting the gravity of the offences and the need for deterrence and retribution.

Orders

Orders of the court

Wound with intent to cause grievous bodily harm

Sentenced to 6 years and 9 months imprisonment with a non-parole period of 4 years.

Finding of special circumstances and matter on Form 1 taken into account.

Specially aggravated kidnapping

Sentenced to 6 years and 9 months imprisonment with a non-parole period of 4 years.

Finding of special circumstances.

Sentences partially accumulated, with a total head sentence of 7 years and 3 months and a total non-parole period of 4 years and 6 months.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.