District Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Voukelatos [2023] NSWDC 304 Hearing dates: 28 July 2023 & 15 August 2023 Date of orders: 18 August 2023 Decision date: 18 August 2023 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Bennett SC DCJ Decision: Specify an aggregate term of imprisonment of 6 years 3 months with a non-parole period of 3 years 9 months
Catchwords: CRIME — Drug offences — Supply prohibited drug — Commercial quantity
CRIME — Firearms offences — Use/Possess prohibited pistol/firearm
SENTENCING — Relevant factors on sentence — Multiple offences — Aggregate sentences
SENTENCING — Relevant factors on sentence — Form 1 offences
SENTENCING — Relevant factors on sentence — Deterrence
SENTENCING — Relevant factors on sentence — Multiple offences
SENTENCING — Relevant factors on sentence — Purposes of sentencing
SENTENCING — Sentencing procedure — Instinctive synthesis
SENTENCING — Sentencing procedure — Expert reports
SENTENCING — Sentencing procedure — Reasons for sentence
Legislation Cited: Confiscation of Proceeds of Crimes Act 1989
Crimes Act 1900
Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999
Customs Act 1901
Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985
Firearms Act 1996
Cases Cited: Attorney General’s Application Under s 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 No. 1 of 2002 [2002] NSWCCA 518
Bugmy v The Queen [2013] HCA 37
Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa [2010] NSWCCA 194
Imbornone v R [2017] NSWCCA 144
Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39
R v Osenkowski (1982) 5 A Crim R 394
R v Valentini (1989) 46 A Crim R 23
Regina v Henry et Al [1999] NSWCCA 111
The Queen v Olbrich [1999] HCA 54
Veen v The Queen (No. 2) (1987-1988) 164 CLR 465; [1988] HCA 14
Texts Cited: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fifth Ed.
Category: Sentence Parties: Rex (Crown)
Eftimos Truthe Miles Voukelatos (Offender)Representation: Michal Solecki (Solicitor for the ODPP)
Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown)
William Barber (Counsel for the Offender)
Richard Cummins Solicitors (Offender)
File Number(s): 2022/00123891
JUDGEMENT ON SENTENCE
Introduction
-
Eftimos Truthe Miles Voukelatos appears for sentence charged with two offences:
Sequence Six
Between 23 December 2021 and 28 April 2022, in Roselands in the State of New South Wales, did supply an amount of a prohibited drug, namely cocaine, being an amount which was not less that the commercial quantity applicable to the prohibited drug.
S 25(2) Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 Law part code 3183
Sequence 18
On 29 April 2022, at Roselands in the State of New South Wales, did possess a pistol, namely, a gel ball air gun, not being authorised to do so by a licence or permit.
S 7(1) Firearms Act 1996 Law part code 53108
-
The offender acknowledged his pleas of guilty in the Local Court and adhered to them in this court.
Additional Offences
-
When deciding upon the sentence for the offence of supply prohibited drug I am…
Continue reading R v Voukelatos
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- R v Voukelatos [2023] NSWDC 304
- Case
- [2023] NSWDC 304
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court had to address several legal issues, including how to determine the appropriate aggregate sentence for multiple offences, the consideration of deterrence in sentencing, and the role of expert reports in understanding the defendant's circumstances. The court also needed to consider the purposes of sentencing, particularly in relation to deterrence and the defendant's potential for rehabilitation.
In delivering the sentence, the court emphasised the seriousness of the offences, noting the significant quantities of drugs involved and the illegal possession of a firearm. The court applied the principle of instinctive synthesis, weighing all relevant factors to arrive at a just outcome. Expert reports were considered to provide insights into the defendant's background and potential for rehabilitation. The court concluded that an aggregate term of imprisonment was necessary to adequately reflect the gravity of the offences, while also considering the potential for the defendant to be rehabilitated. The final sentence was an aggregate term of imprisonment of six years and three months, with a non-parole period of three years and nine months.
Orders
Orders of the court
Specify an aggregate term of imprisonment of 6 years 3 months with a non-parole period of 3 years 9 months
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.