DISTRICT COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CITATION:
R v Vantoosten [2009] QDC 2
PARTIES:
R
v
VANTOOSTEN, Craig Daniel
FILE NO/S:
628 of 2008
DIVISION:
Criminal
PROCEEDING:
Sentence
ORIGINATING COURT:
Brisbane District Court
DELIVERED ON:
12 January 2009
DELIVERED AT:
Brisbane District Court
HEARING DATE:
12 January 2009
JUDGE:
M W Forde DCJ
ORDER:
(1) On each of counts 1 and 2 sentence the prisoner to
imprisonment for 12 months;
(2) Both terms of imprisonment to be served concurrently;
(3) The parole eligibility date is 12 May 2009.
CATCHWORDS:
Criminal law – possession of child exploitation material – sentence – principles of sentencing - factors to be taken into account – sexual offence
Correctives Services Act 2006 (Qld) Schedule 1
Criminal Code Act 1899 (Qld) s 228D
Criminal Code and Other Acts Amendment Act 2008 (Qld), s 136
Penalties and Sentences Act 1992 (Qld), ss 9(2)(a), 9(6A), 9(6B), 160D
R v Riley [2007] QCA 391, referred to
R v Daw [2006] QCA 386, referred to
R v Richardson [2007] QCA 294, referred to
R v Plunkett [2006] QCA 182, referred to
COUNSEL:
A Meisenhelter for the Crown
L Dollar for the Defendant
SOLICITORS:
Director of Public Prosecutions (Queensland) for the Crown
Fisher Dore for the Defendant
Introduction
The defendant has pleaded guilty to two counts of knowingly possessing child exploitation material under section 228D of the Criminal Code Act 1899 (Qld) (“the Criminal Code”). This matter was set for trial today. The defendant indicated that he would plead guilty on last Friday after the Crown indicated that it would not proceed on count 3. Count 3 related to another 44 images. It is unlikely that the sentence on count 3 would have added to the criminality on counts 1 and 2. The material on counts 1 and 2 could be considered the worst type for this offence.
The details of the counts are as follows:[1]
[1]Transcript 1-2.23 to 1-4.33
Facts
The details of the counts are as follows, as appears in the agreed summary, exhibit 2. A person with whom you were living found the relevant material and passed it on to police. In total, you had in your possession, 71 images, 33 videos and two text files, all of which, it is agreed, constituted child exploitation material.
Count 1
"Child exploitation material on the 90 gigabyte hard drive was found in the following folders." I will now summarise those.
Three child exploitation picture files, such as, "13 year, My little sister posing nude", and "Pedo Mum and Daughter."
Two child exploitation text files in a folder entitled, "Pics.rar." The folder is password protected and was accessed by analysts.
You gave your password to police. There were some 68 child exploitation images. The names in the file included, Six year old girl about to have sex with father." "Seven year old girl playing with seven year old boy in shower." "Eight year old, Natasha, about to have sex." "Nine year old having sex with Dad." "Eight year…
Continue reading R v. Vantoosten
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- R v Vantoosten [2009] QDC 2
- Case
- [2009] QDC 2
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the nature of the offence and the relevant legal principles. It considered the gravity of the crime, the impact of the material on the victims, and the offender's role in the distribution and possession of such material. The court also took into account Vantoosten's background, his personal circumstances, and any mitigating or aggravating factors. In determining the sentence, the court aimed to balance the need for punishment with the opportunity for rehabilitation, while also considering the need to protect the community from further harm.
In its decision, the court sentenced Vantoosten to imprisonment for 12 months on each of the two counts, to be served concurrently. The court set the parole eligibility date as 12 May 2009, providing an opportunity for Vantoosten to demonstrate rehabilitation and reintegration into society. The court emphasised the importance of deterrence and the need to send a strong message about the seriousness of possessing and distributing child exploitation material. The final orders were in line with the sentencing principles applied, ensuring a fair and proportionate punishment for the offence committed.
Orders
Orders of the court
(1) On each of counts 1 and 2 sentence the prisoner to
imprisonment for 12 months;
(2) Both terms of imprisonment to be served concurrently;
(3) The parole eligibility date is 12 May 2009.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.