District Court
New South Wales
- Amendment notes
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Thota [2024] NSWDC 48 Hearing dates: 9 February 2024 Date of orders: 1 March 2024 Decision date: 01 March 2024 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Mahony SC DCJ Decision: Custodial sentence with recognizance. Release order to take effect immediately. For orders see [92].
Catchwords: CRIME – deal with money proceeds of indictable crime – give false and misleading information to a reporting entity.
Legislation Cited: Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006
Crimes Act 1914
Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999
Criminal Code Act 1995
Cases Cited: Cahyadi v R (2007)168 A Crim R 41; [2007] NSWCCA 1
Green v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 462
Kim v The Queen 2016 [VSCA] 238
R v Ansari (2007) 70 NSWLR 89; [2007] NSWCCA 204
R v Huang; R v Siu (2007) 174 A Crim R 370
Category: Sentence Parties: Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (the Crown)
Druga Hemanth Thota (the offender)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitor:
Ms C Akthar (the Crown)
Mr Lewis (the offender)
File Number(s): 2022/93762
remarks on sentence
-
Druga Hemanth Thota is to be sentenced in respect of the following three offences to which he has pleaded guilty:-
Sequence 4 – Between about 16 March 2022 and about 18 March 2022 at Sydney in the State of New South Wales, he dealt with money or other property, it being reasonable to suspect that such money or other property was proceeds of an indictable crime and at the time of the dealing the value of the money or other property was less than $100,000.
This is an offence pursuant to s 400.9 (1A) of the Criminal Code Act (Cth) (“the Code”). The maximum penalty for the offence is imprisonment for 2 years, or 120 penalty units, or both.
Sequence 38 – On or about 9 October 2021 at Sydney in the State of New South Wales, he dealt with money or other property that was proceeds of indictable crime and he was reckless as to the fact that the money or other property was proceeds of indictable crime and at the time of the dealing the value of the money or other property was $1,000 or more.
This is an offence pursuant to s 400.7(2) of the Code. The maximum penalty for the offence is imprisonment for 2 years, or 120 penalty units, or both.
Sequence 40 – Between about 22 February 2022 and about 26 March 2022 at Sydney in the State of New South Wales, he gave information to a reporting entity knowing that the information was false or misleading, and that information was given or purportedly given under the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006 (Cth) or a provision of the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financial Rules.
This is an offence pursuant s 136(1) of the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006 (Cth). The maximum penalty for this offence is imprisonment for 10 years, or 10,000 penalty units, or both.
-
There are two matters…
Continue reading R v Thota
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- R v Thota [2024] NSWDC 48
- Case
- [2024] NSWDC 48
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court had to decide on the severity of the sentence, taking into account the defendant's involvement in dealing with money derived from criminal activities and the extent of misleading information provided to a financial entity. The legal issues involved interpreting the relevant sections of the Crimes Act 1958, specifically those addressing the handling of criminal proceeds and the provision of misleading information to financial institutions. The court also needed to consider mitigating and aggravating factors in determining the sentence.
The court considered the defendant's prior criminal record, the seriousness of the offence, and the impact on the financial system. It was noted that the defendant had provided false and misleading information to a financial entity, which could potentially facilitate further criminal activities. However, the court also took into account the defendant's cooperation with authorities and expressions of remorse. Ultimately, the court decided on a custodial sentence, followed by a recognizance, and ordered the defendant's immediate release. For specific details of the orders, refer to paragraph 92 of the judgment.
Orders
Orders of the court
Custodial sentence with recognizance. Release order to take effect immediately. For orders see [92].
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.