R v Tham

Case [2017] NSWDC 40


District Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: R v Tham [2017] NSWDC 40
Hearing dates: 27 January 2017
Date of orders: 27 January 2017
Decision date: 27 January 2017
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: Berman SC DCJ
Decision:

For the Commonwealth offence of using a carriage service to access child pornography I impose a fixed term of imprisonment of 18 months.

 

For the State offence of possessing child abuse material I impose a non-parole period of 18 months with a head sentence of three years.

 I order that the various items referred to in the forfeiture order are to be forfeited to the Commonwealth.
Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Sentence – Commonwealth and state offences – Use carriage service to access child pornography – Possess child abuse material – Offender a victim of sexual assault
Category:Sentence
Parties: The Crown
Nicholas Tham
Representation:

Counsel:
Mr J Tyler-Stott - The offender

  Solicitors:
Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) – The Crown
File Number(s): 2015/28044

SENTENCE

  1. HIS HONOUR: One of the puzzling features that offences involving child pornography present is this:, how can a person gain sexual gratification whilst what he or she is watching a child being harmed?. Yet, as is distressingly commonly the case, that is precisely what many people, usually men, in the community experience as they see children engaged in sexual activity, even sexual activity involving bestiality and sadism.

  2. In the present case the offender Nicholas Tham accessed and possessed and viewed child pornography for at least two years, fooling himself that the children involved in the production of the material were not real people but were merely two dimensional objects. Through this means he says he was able to reconcile what he clearly understood to be his illegal activities. He himself was the victim of sexual abuse as a child. One of the harms that sexual abuse causes to children comes from the fact that children often gain physical enjoyment from the abuse perpetrated upon them. That appears to have happened in Mr Tham’s case, something which has caused him guilt and confusion in his later years. Thus the offender had a greater difficulty than most in appreciating the harm which was being caused to the children depicted in child pornography he was accessing, possessing and viewing. That is a significant matter in determining the appropriate sentence which I will impose in the present case.

  3. The offender’s IP address was identified by investigators as being used to access a particular form of peer-to-peer file sharing software used for the sharing and trading of child pornography. Thus on 29 January 2015 both Commonwealth and State police officers went to the offender’s address. They searched his premises and discovered a large number of storage media as well as four bottles of steroids. An investigation of the various storage media revealed that there were more than 100,000 files and articles of child pornography material. It is the unfortunate task of many police officers to have to view such material and categorise it for…

Continue reading R v Tham

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
R v Tham [2017] NSWDC 40
Case
[2017] NSWDC 40
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The defendant, Tham, was convicted of using a carriage service to access child pornography under Commonwealth law and possessing child abuse material under state law. The case was heard in the relevant court, where the judge was required to determine the appropriate sentences for these offences. The court also considered the defendant's background, including the fact that they were a victim of sexual assault.

The primary legal issue before the court was the appropriate sentencing for the defendant's convictions. The court had to balance the seriousness of the offences with the defendant's personal circumstances, including their history of sexual assault. The court also needed to consider the deterrent effect of the sentence on others who might commit similar offences.

In delivering the judgment, the court first acknowledged the gravity of the offences, particularly given the vulnerable nature of the victims. The court also recognised the defendant's personal circumstances, including their history of sexual assault, which may have contributed to their offending behaviour. However, the court emphasised the need to protect children and deter others from committing similar offences. The court imposed a fixed term of imprisonment for the Commonwealth offence and a non-parole period with a head sentence for the state offence. The court also ordered the forfeiture of various items related to the offences.

The court's final orders included a fixed term of imprisonment of 18 months for the Commonwealth offence and a non-parole period of 18 months with a head sentence of three years for the state offence. The court also ordered the forfeiture of various items related to the offences.

Orders

Orders of the court

For the Commonwealth offence of using a carriage service to access child pornography I impose a fixed term of imprisonment of 18 months.

For the State offence of possessing child abuse material I impose a non-parole period of 18 months with a head sentence of three years.

I order that the various items referred to in the forfeiture order are to be forfeited to the Commonwealth.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.