District Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Tham [2017] NSWDC 40 Hearing dates: 27 January 2017 Date of orders: 27 January 2017 Decision date: 27 January 2017 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Berman SC DCJ Decision: For the Commonwealth offence of using a carriage service to access child pornography I impose a fixed term of imprisonment of 18 months.
For the State offence of possessing child abuse material I impose a non-parole period of 18 months with a head sentence of three years.
I order that the various items referred to in the forfeiture order are to be forfeited to the Commonwealth.Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Sentence – Commonwealth and state offences – Use carriage service to access child pornography – Possess child abuse material – Offender a victim of sexual assault Category: Sentence Parties: The Crown
Nicholas ThamRepresentation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
Mr J Tyler-Stott - The offender
Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) – The Crown
File Number(s): 2015/28044
SENTENCE
-
HIS HONOUR: One of the puzzling features that offences involving child pornography present is this:, how can a person gain sexual gratification whilst what he or she is watching a child being harmed?. Yet, as is distressingly commonly the case, that is precisely what many people, usually men, in the community experience as they see children engaged in sexual activity, even sexual activity involving bestiality and sadism.
-
In the present case the offender Nicholas Tham accessed and possessed and viewed child pornography for at least two years, fooling himself that the children involved in the production of the material were not real people but were merely two dimensional objects. Through this means he says he was able to reconcile what he clearly understood to be his illegal activities. He himself was the victim of sexual abuse as a child. One of the harms that sexual abuse causes to children comes from the fact that children often gain physical enjoyment from the abuse perpetrated upon them. That appears to have happened in Mr Tham’s case, something which has caused him guilt and confusion in his later years. Thus the offender had a greater difficulty than most in appreciating the harm which was being caused to the children depicted in child pornography he was accessing, possessing and viewing. That is a significant matter in determining the appropriate sentence which I will impose in the present case.
-
The offender’s IP address was identified by investigators as being used to access a particular form of peer-to-peer file sharing software used for the sharing and trading of child pornography. Thus on 29 January 2015 both Commonwealth and State police officers went to the offender’s address. They searched his premises and discovered a large number of storage media as well as four bottles of steroids. An investigation of the various storage media revealed that there were more than 100,000 files and articles of child pornography material. It is the unfortunate task of many police officers to have to view such material and categorise it for…
Continue reading R v Tham
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- R v Tham [2017] NSWDC 40
- Case
- [2017] NSWDC 40
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was the appropriate sentencing for the defendant's convictions. The court had to balance the seriousness of the offences with the defendant's personal circumstances, including their history of sexual assault. The court also needed to consider the deterrent effect of the sentence on others who might commit similar offences.
In delivering the judgment, the court first acknowledged the gravity of the offences, particularly given the vulnerable nature of the victims. The court also recognised the defendant's personal circumstances, including their history of sexual assault, which may have contributed to their offending behaviour. However, the court emphasised the need to protect children and deter others from committing similar offences. The court imposed a fixed term of imprisonment for the Commonwealth offence and a non-parole period with a head sentence for the state offence. The court also ordered the forfeiture of various items related to the offences.
The court's final orders included a fixed term of imprisonment of 18 months for the Commonwealth offence and a non-parole period of 18 months with a head sentence of three years for the state offence. The court also ordered the forfeiture of various items related to the offences.
Orders
Orders of the court
For the Commonwealth offence of using a carriage service to access child pornography I impose a fixed term of imprisonment of 18 months.
For the State offence of possessing child abuse material I impose a non-parole period of 18 months with a head sentence of three years.
I order that the various items referred to in the forfeiture order are to be forfeited to the Commonwealth.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.