R v Swinton

Case [2023] NSWDC 126


District Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: R v Swinton [2023] NSWDC 126
Hearing dates: 31/10/22, 3/11/22, 17/2/23, 24/2/23
Date of orders: 24/2/23
Decision date: 24 February 2023
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: Bourke SC DCJ
Decision:

Convicted and sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment of 9 months. However, pursuant to s20(1)(b) of the Crimes Act (Cth), the offender is to be released forthwith, upon a Recognisance Release Order for a period of 18 months, after entering a self-recognisance in the amount of $500, subject to the following conditions:

1. To be of good behaviour for 18 months.

2. Accept the supervision of Community Corrections.

3. Obey all reasonable directions of Community Corrections.

4. Not to travel interstate or overseas without the written permission of Community Corrections.

5. Undertake treatment or other counselling as directed by Community Corrections.

The indicative sentences are:

Count 1 – 7 months

Count 2 – 4 months

I direct the offender to report to the Armidale office of Community Corrections within 7 days.

I direct that a copy of the report of Dr Ashleigh Scwesienberg be forwarded to Armidale Community Corrections.

I make the Forfeiture Order.

Catchwords:

Crime – Sentence – Commonwealth offences - Use carriage service to transmit indecent communication to person under 16 years.

Legislation Cited:

Commonwealth Criminal Code

Crimes Act 1914

Cases Cited:

R v Aniezue [2016] ACTSC 82

Totaan v R [2022] NSWCCA 75

Category:Sentence
Parties: Commonwealth DPP – Crown
Colin Bernard Swinton - Offender
Representation: Ms D New for Crown
Mr B Pierce for Offender
File Number(s): 21/335423

sentence

  1. The offender Mr Swinton stood trial during the week commencing 31 October 2022 before a jury on two charges under s 474.27A(1) at the Commonwealth Criminal Code. The jury subsequently found the offender guilty of both counts, on which he must now be sentenced. Each of the offences carries a maximum penalty of ten years imprisonment, which of course is an important guidepost in the sentencing exercise.

FACTS

  1. The facts upon which the offender is to be sentenced are derived from the evidence led at trial which are set out in a document provided by the Crown and about which there is essentially no dispute. Those facts in summary are as follows: At the relevant time, the offender was 30 years of age and lived in Katoomba. The facts in relation to the count 1 offence are as follows; on 10 April 2021, CEIU41 which was an identity used by an undercover police officer, to whom I will refer hereafter as an Assumed Online Identity or just by the letters AOI. That person and the offender communicated on an online chatroom website called Chatiw. To register on Chatiw, the user needed to put in an age that is 18 years or over. However, there is no documentation required in order to verify a person’s age. The offender had the username “Anyone4K9KOK”. The offender did not have a profile picture. The offender was a regular user of Chatiw at the…

Continue reading R v Swinton

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
R v Swinton [2023] NSWDC 126
Case
[2023] NSWDC 126
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of R v Swinton involved the defendant, Swinton, who was convicted of using a carriage service to transmit an indecent communication to a person under 16 years. The matter was heard in a court of law in Australia. The defendant was found guilty on two counts related to this offence, leading to a sentencing hearing where the court determined an appropriate punishment.

The legal issues that the court was required to address included the appropriate sentence for the defendant's actions, considering the severity and nature of the crimes committed. The court also had to consider the defendant's background, remorse, and the potential for rehabilitation in determining the sentence. Additionally, the court needed to weigh the need for deterrence and protection of the community against the defendant's personal circumstances.

In delivering the judgment, the court carefully considered the principles of sentencing under Australian law, particularly those related to Commonwealth offences involving the use of a carriage service to communicate indecently with a minor. The court acknowledged the seriousness of the offences but also took into account mitigating factors such as the defendant's otherwise good character and the potential for rehabilitation. Ultimately, the court decided that an aggregate term of imprisonment of nine months was appropriate, with specific conditions for the defendant's release under a Recognisance Release Order for a period of 18 months. The court also imposed several conditions to ensure the defendant's compliance with the order and to facilitate his rehabilitation.

The final orders of the court included a direction for the defendant to report to the Armidale office of Community Corrections within seven days, the forwarding of a psychological report to the same office, and the imposition of a Forfeiture Order. The court's decision balanced the need for punishment and deterrence with the opportunity for the defendant to rehabilitate and reintegrate into society.

Orders

Orders of the court

Convicted and sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment of 9 months. However, pursuant to s20(1)(b) of the Crimes Act (Cth), the offender is to be released forthwith, upon a Recognisance Release Order for a period of 18 months, after entering a self-recognisance in the amount of $500, subject to the following conditions:

1. To be of good behaviour for 18 months.

2. Accept the supervision of Community Corrections.

3. Obey all reasonable directions of Community Corrections.

4. Not to travel interstate or overseas without the written permission of Community Corrections.

5. Undertake treatment or other counselling as directed by Community Corrections.

The indicative sentences are:

Count 1 – 7 months

Count 2 – 4 months

I direct the offender to report to the Armidale office of Community Corrections within 7 days.

I direct that a copy of the report of Dr Ashleigh Scwesienberg be forwarded to Armidale Community Corrections.

I make the Forfeiture Order.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.