Actions
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Statutory Material Cited
1
-
R v Mann
[2020] SASCFC 69
Citation 1
(Para 5)
…e accused was an adult during the period of the relationship. 4.The complainant was a child during the period of the relationship. [2] R v Mann [2020] SASCFC 69.…
-
R v Tran
[2017] SASCFC 99
Citation 2
(Para 17)
…lation to that explanation at a time when she offered other explanations, is in my respectful opinion, a nonsense. [173] (1991) 173 CLR 95. [174] [2017] SASCFC 99 at [33]. [175] At [40].…
-
Douglass v The Queen
[2012] HCA 34
Citation 3
(Para 20)
…There was nothing inherently implausible in her evidence. That, of course, is not enough.[176] [176] See Douglass v The Queen (2012) 86 ALJR 1086; [2012] HCA 34 at [12]-[13].…
-
R v Maiden
[1999] NSWSC 311
Citation 4
…1929 (SA) s 34O(2), s 34P; Juries Act 1927 (SA) s 7(1)(a), referred to. R v Mann [2020] SASCFC 69; Browne v Dunn (1893) 6 R 67; Petty v The Queen; Maiden v The Queen (1991) 173 CLR 95; R v Tran [2017] SASCFC 99; Douglass v The Queen (2012) 86 ALJR 1086, considered.…
-
Petty v the Queen
[1991] HCA 34
Citation 5
(Para 17)
…er right to silence in relation to that explanation at a time when she offered other explanations, is in my respectful opinion, a nonsense. [173] (1991) 173 CLR 95. [174] [2017] SASCFC 99 at [33]. [175] At [40].…