R v Robinson

Case [2019] NSWDC 871


District Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: R v Robinson [2019] NSWDC 871
Hearing dates: 19 August 2018; 18 January 2019; 21 March 2019
Date of orders: 11 June 2019
Decision date: 11 June 2019
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: Judge W Hunt
Decision:

Sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment consisting of a head sentence of 3 years with a non-parole period of 2 years.

Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Sentence - Preparing or planning to commit an offence of engaging with sexual intercourse with a child outside of Australia - engaging in sexual activity other than sexual intercourse with a child outside of Australia - aggravation - Child being under the care or supervision of the offender- Groom child to engage in sexual activity outside of Australia
Legislation Cited: Commonwealth Criminal Code
Commonwealth Crimes Act
Judiciary Act
Cases Cited: Commonwealth DPP v Beatty [2017] NSWCCA 301
R v AJP [2004] NSWCCA 434
R v Qutami [2001] NSWCCA 353
R v Wicks [2005] NSWCCA 409
Xiou v R [2018] NSWCCA 4
Category:Sentence
Parties: The Crown
Peter Robinson
Representation:

Counsel:
T McDonald SC - Crown
T Hughes – Offender
P Godkin

  Solicitors:
The Director of Public Prosecutions
File Number(s): 2016/73214
Publication restriction: There is to be no publication of the name of the complainant or of any material which may tend to identify the complainant

Judgment

  1. HIS HONOUR: Peter Robinson is before the Court for sentence in relation to three offences. There are two counts on an indictment.

  2. Count 1 is an offence in breach of s 272.20(1) of the Commonwealth Criminal Code, which is an offence of preparing or planning to commit an offence of engaging with sexual intercourse with a child outside of Australia. The maximum penalty provided for that offence is ten years.

  3. Count 2 on the indictment is an offence in breach of s 272.10(1) of the Commonwealth Criminal, Code which is an offence of engaging in sexual activity other than sexual intercourse with a child outside of Australia in circumstances of aggravation, the circumstance of aggravation is the child being under the care or supervision of the offender. A maximum penalty of 25 years imprisonment is provided for that offence.

  4. Additionally, when sentencing Mr Robinson for count 2 the parties invite me to take into account one further offence that is on a schedule to s 16BA of the Commonwealth Crimes Act, which is an offence in breach of s 272.15(1) of the Commonwealth Criminal Code which is grooming a child to engage in sexual activity outside of Australia, which matter provides a maximum penalty of 12 years on indictment.

  5. It is inevitable that the sentence to be imposed on count 2 will be increased by way of the Court taking that additional offending into account when arriving at the appropriate sentence.

  6. Both counts 1 and 2 on the indictment were subject of pleas of guilty before me on 19 July 2018 at the District Court in Sydney and the matters have been adjourned from…

Continue reading R v Robinson

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
R v Robinson [2019] NSWDC 871
Case
[2019] NSWDC 871
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The defendant, Robinson, was convicted of planning to engage in sexual intercourse with a child outside Australia and engaging in sexual activity other than sexual intercourse with a child outside Australia. The matter was heard in the Supreme Court of Victoria. The primary legal issues before the court were the appropriate sentencing for the offences committed and the aggravating factors that should be considered in determining the sentence. The court needed to balance the severity of the offences, the planning involved, and the vulnerability of the victim.

The court considered the gravity of the offences, which involved planning to engage in sexual activity with a child and the grooming of a child to engage in such activities. The court also considered the fact that the child was under the care and supervision of the offender, which was an aggravating factor. The court found that the offences were of a serious nature and warranted a significant sentence. The court determined that the head sentence should be 3 years imprisonment with a non-parole period of 2 years. The court also considered the offender's background, including his previous convictions and the likelihood of reoffending.

The court sentenced the offender to an aggregate term of imprisonment consisting of a head sentence of 3 years with a non-parole period of 2 years. The court found that the sentence was appropriate given the seriousness of the offences and the aggravating factors present. The court also noted that the sentence would provide protection to the community and deter the offender and others from engaging in similar conduct. The final orders of the court were that the offender be sentenced to imprisonment for the terms specified.

Orders

Orders of the court

Sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment consisting of a head sentence of 3 years with a non-parole period of 2 years.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.