R v Roberson aka Luke

Case [2010] NSWDC 216


CITATION: R v Roberson aka Luke [2010] NSWDC 216
HEARING DATE(S): 30/07/2010
 
JUDGMENT DATE: 

13 August 2010
JURISDICTION: Crime
JUDGMENT OF: Norrish QC DCJ
DECISION: H37339670 – 001 Convicted: Sentenced to a term of imprisonment consisting of a non parole period being 1 year commencing on 7.8.11 and to expire on 6.8.12. Balance of the sentence being 2 years is to expire on 6.8.14. Eligible for release to parole on 6.8.12.
H37339670 – 002 Convicted: Sentenced to a term of imprisonment consisting of a non parole period being 1 year commencing on 7.8.11 and to expire on 6.8.12. Balance of the sentence being 3 years and 6 months is to expire on 6.2.16. I find special circumstances. Eligible for release to parole on 6.8.12.
H37339670 – 004 – Taking into account matters of a Form 1. Convicted: Sentenced to a term of imprisonment which consists of a non parole period being 9 months commencing on 7.11.11 and to expire on 6.8.12. Balance of the sentence being 3 years and 6 months is to expire on 6.2.16. I find special circumstances. Eligible for release to parole on 6.8.12.
H37339670 – 005 – Convicted: Sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 2 years and 3 months commencing on 7.8.09 and to expire on 6.11.11.
H37339670 – 006 – Convicted: Sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 2 years and 3 months commencing on 7.8.09 and to expire on 6.11.11.
CATCHWORDS: CRIME - Sentence - assault with intent to take and drive a conveyance - robbery in company
LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes Act 1900
Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999
CASES CITED: Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610
Markarian v The Queen (2005) 79 ALJR 1048: [2005] HCA 25
Henry v R (1999) 46 NSWLR 346
R v O'Callaghan [2006] NSWCCA 58
Attorney Generals Reference No 2 (2002) 56 NSWLR 147
Way v The Queen [2004] NSWCCA 131
Anderson v The Queen [2008] NSWCCA 211
R v MLP [2006] NSWCCA 271
R v MMK (2006) 164 A Crim R 481
R v XX [2009] NSWCCA 115
Arnaouto v The Queen (2008) 191 A Crim R 149
Jagou & Ors [2009] NSWCCA 167
Blackman and Waters [2001] NSWCCA 121
PARTIES: Regina
Michael Roberson aka Michael Luke
FILE NUMBER(S): 2009/00042534
SOLICITORS: Ms Kemp - Director of Public Prosecutions
Mr Karim - Offender (ALS)

SENTENCE

1 Michael Luke. I propose to sentence you to six and a half years imprisonment with a non-parole period of three years. Those sentences will be backdated to 7 August 2009 so they will be partially accumulative upon the balance of parole and other sentences that were imposed in the Local Court. You can take a seat while I give my reasons now.

2 Michael Luke appears today for sentence in relation to a number of offences that were committed between 3 April and 5 April 2009. If ever there was a case that highlighted the difficulties involved in applying properly principles such as those set out in the…

Continue reading R v Roberson aka Luke

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
R v Roberson aka Luke [2010] NSWDC 216
Case
[2010] NSWDC 216
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of R v Roberson, also known as Luke, the defendants were convicted of various criminal offences, including assault with intent to take and drive a conveyance, and robbery in company. The matter was heard in the relevant court, where the primary concern was the sentencing of the defendants. The court had to determine the appropriate terms of imprisonment and non-parole periods for each defendant, taking into consideration the nature and severity of the crimes committed.

The legal issues before the court included the assessment of the defendants' criminal history, the circumstances of the offences, and the principles of sentencing. The court had to weigh the aggravating and mitigating factors presented in the case to arrive at a just and appropriate sentence. Special circumstances were also considered, as the court had to determine whether any factors warranted a departure from the usual sentencing guidelines.

After evaluating the evidence and arguments presented, the court found special circumstances in certain cases. The court sentenced the defendants to terms of imprisonment with specific non-parole periods and balance sentences, taking into account the nature of the offences and the defendants' criminal history. The court found that the defendants were eligible for parole release on certain dates, depending on their individual sentences.

The final orders reflect the court's determination of the appropriate sentences for each defendant, considering the specific circumstances of the case. The sentences ranged from a non-parole period of 9 months to 1 year, with balance sentences varying between 2 years and 3 months to 3 years and 6 months. The court's decision was based on a thorough analysis of the evidence and the relevant sentencing principles.

Orders

Orders of the court

H37339670 – 001 Convicted: Sentenced to a term of imprisonment consisting of a non parole period being 1 year commencing on 7.8.11 and to expire on 6.8.12. Balance of the sentence being 2 years is to expire on 6.8.14. Eligible for release to parole on 6.8.12.

H37339670 – 002 Convicted: Sentenced to a term of imprisonment consisting of a non parole period being 1 year commencing on 7.8.11 and to expire on 6.8.12. Balance of the sentence being 3 years and 6 months is to expire on 6.2.16. I find special circumstances. Eligible for release to parole on 6.8.12.

H37339670 – 004 – Taking into account matters of a Form 1. Convicted: Sentenced to a term of imprisonment which consists of a non parole period being 9 months commencing on 7.11.11 and to expire on 6.8.12. Balance of the sentence being 3 years and 6 months is to expire on 6.2.16. I find special circumstances. Eligible for release to parole on 6.8.12.

H37339670 – 005 – Convicted: Sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 2 years and 3 months commencing on 7.8.09 and to expire on 6.11.11.

H37339670 – 006 – Convicted: Sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 2 years and 3 months commencing on 7.8.09 and to expire on 6.11.11.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.