R v Rad

Case [2018] QCA 103


SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND

CITATION:

R v Rad [2018] QCA 103

PARTIES:

R
v
RAD, Mehdi Sharifi
(appellant)

FILE NO/S:

CA No 281 of 2017
DC No 1450 of 2017

DIVISION:

Court of Appeal

PROCEEDING:

Appeal against Conviction

ORIGINATING COURT:

District Court at Brisbane – Date of Conviction: 8 November 2017 (Devereaux SC DCJ)

DELIVERED ON:

1 June 2018

DELIVERED AT:

Brisbane

HEARING DATE:

13 April 2018

JUDGES:

Gotterson and Morrison JJA and Davis J

ORDER:

Appeal dismissed.

CATCHWORDS:

CRIMINAL LAW – APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – OBJECTIONS OR POINTS NOT RAISED IN COURT BELOW – MISDIRECTION AND NON-DIRECTION – PARTICULAR CASES – where the appellant was convicted on jury’s verdict of one count of rape – where the appellant alleged the trial judge erred by failing to make two directions – where those directions related to the appellant’s English ability and to intoxication – whether the directions given were insufficent as to cause a miscarriage of justice

Criminal Code (Qld), s 2, s 6, s 348, s 349, s 668E

Alford v Magee (1952) 85 CLR 437; [1952] HCA 3, cited
Daniels v The Queen (1989) 1 WAR 435, considered
Dhanhoa v The Queen (2003) 217 CLR 1; [2003] HCA 40, applied
Director of Public Prosecutions v Merriman [1973] AC 584, considered
Jones v The Queen [1980] WAR 203; [1980] WASC 37, considered
Kaitamaki v The Queen [1985] AC 147, cited
Lapthorne v The Queen [1990] WAR 207; [1989] WASC 98, considered
Nudd v The Queen (2006) 80 ALJR 614; [2006] HCA 9, cited
R v Huston[2017] QCA 121, cited
R v Knight[2017] QCA 98, cited
R v Mayberry [1973] Qd R 211, cited
R v O’Loughlin[2011] QCA 123, cited
S v The Queen (1989) 168 CLR 266; [1989] HCA 66, considered
Vereker & Forsyth v Rodda (1987) 18 FCR 83; [1987] FCA 109, cited

COUNSEL:

T Glynn QC for the appellant
J Wooldridge for the respondent

SOLICITORS:

Havas & Dib Lawyers for the appellant
Director of Public Prosecutions (Queensland) for the respondent

  1. GOTTERSON JA:  I agree with the order proposed by Davis J and with the reasons given by his Honour.

  2. MORRISON JA:  I agree with the reasons of Davis J and the order his Honour proposes.

  3. DAVIS J:  The appellant was convicted of one count of rape on 8 November 2017 after a trial in the District Court.  He was sentenced to five years imprisonment suspended after 18 months with an operational period of five years.  He appealed against his conviction and sought leave to appeal against sentence.  However, the application for leave to appeal against sentence was abandoned.

  4. By his Notice of Appeal the appellant challenged the jury’s verdict on two of the bases identified in s 668E of the Criminal Code: that the verdict was not supported by the evidence, and that the verdict of the jury was unreasonable. Those grounds were abandoned and…

Continue reading R v Rad

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
R v Rad [2018] QCA 103
Case
[2018] QCA 103
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Queensland, the appellant, Sharifi Rad, contested his conviction on a jury's verdict for one count of rape. Rad contended that the trial judge had erred by not issuing two specific directions to the jury. The first direction pertained to Rad's English language proficiency, and the second to the influence of intoxication on his actions during the incident. Rad argued that the omissions by the trial judge led to a miscarriage of justice.

The court was tasked with determining whether the alleged omissions by the trial judge constituted a miscarriage of justice. It was established that when a complaint on appeal concerns a trial judge's failure to provide a direction that was not requested at trial, the relevant ground for appeal can only be a miscarriage of justice. To successfully argue this, Rad had to demonstrate that the direction should have been given and it was reasonably possible that the failure to direct the jury may have affected the verdict.

The court reviewed the evidence presented during the trial and considered Rad's arguments. It found that the trial judge had provided adequate directions to the jury on the matters of English language proficiency and intoxication. The court concluded that there was no miscarriage of justice and the trial judge's directions were sufficient. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.

No further orders were made.

Orders

Orders of the court

Appeal dismissed.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

In Dhanhoa v The Queen[3] McHugh and Gummow JJ observed that where, on appeal, the complaint is a failure of the trial judge to give directions which were not requested at trial, the relevant ground of appeal can only be that there was a miscarriage of justice[4] and an appellant must demonstrate “… that the direction should have been given and it is ‘reasonably possible’ that a failure to direct the jury ‘may have affected the verdict.’”[5] Dhanhoa v The Queen was an appeal from the Court of Criminal Appeal of New South Wales. Section 6 of the Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (New South Wales) is in similar terms to s 668E(1) of the Code. This Court has consistently applied the principles from Dhanhoa that I have described above to appeals from Queensland Courts based on a failure of a trial judge to give a direction which was not requested at trial.[6][3](2003) 217 CLR 1.[4]Dhanhoa at [38].[5]Dhanhoa at [38].[6]R v Huston [2017] QCA 121 and R v Knight [2017] QCA 98.The evidence The complainant’s version as given in evidence-in-chief was as follows:“CROWN PROSECUTOR: So you were in the lounge room, watching videos?---Yes, we started making out a bit on the couch.When you say making out - - -?---Just having – kissing, a little bit of hands on the bum and whatnot.When you say hands on the bum, whose hands?---Mehdi’s hands on my bum.And who was kissing who?---Both kissing each other.And what happened then?---He got up to get a drink, he got a Captain Morgan and a Sprite. He also got changed into a pair of black tracksuit pants, instead of the cream jeans. He came back to the couch to drink his drink and we watched the videos for a bit longer. He had a couple more drinks – maybe two or three more and before we started making out again, we were making out a second time and he asked me if I wanted to go to the bedroom. Before I could say anything, he’d picked me up off the couch and started walking towards the room.If I could stop you there? Can you recall what time this was?---Probably about 9 o’clock.So what happened after he picked you up?---Started walking towards the room. I got down, out of his grip and he grabbed some keys from the table, at the top of the stairs, walked down to the bedroom. He unlocked the door with these keys, we walked in and he closed the door behind him, started making out again. He pulled off my jumper and then got completely undressed himself. He then pulled my pants down.What clothing were you wearing at that point?---The grey knit jumper, black singlet and a – black leggings.And then what happened?---We were fully undressed. I told him to put a condom on. He told me he didn’t. I told him, “No, seriously, you do” and he turned around and said, “No, I don’t” bef – as he was pushing me on the bed and he put his penis in my vagina and started to thrust. I – he’d pinned me, with his hands, on my arms, sort of up near my shoulders, with his weight pushing up off me.So you just indicated with your hand there, towards the top of your arm?---Yep.Continue?---He then was using his weight in that area of my arm to hold me down. My arms were beside me. I put my arms up onto his stomach as I was telling him to get off me.You indicated you put your arms on his stomach?---Yep.Were you doing anything with your arms?---I was pushing up against him, on – like, on the sides of his stomach.Were you saying anything at this point?---I was telling him to get off me.Was he saying anything in response?---No.What was he doing?---He was, eyes closed, thrusting, in his own world and then I was starting to wriggle a bit, trying to get out of his grips and he then flipped me.And how did that happen?---Kept one arm where it was, on this side and put the other hand under this shoulder and just sort of flipped.So you’re indicating to your left shoulder, he kept his hand on that shoulder?---Yes.What hand was that of his?---It would’ve been his right hand.And what did he do with his other hand?---Put it underneath my right shoulder, on the bottom side of it and flipped.Did you say anything at that point?---I don’t remember saying anything.And what happened after that?---After that, he put himself back in me. I was getting up on my hands and knees to try to crawl away and he put his hand in the back – middle of my back and pushed down against me with all his strength, pushing my hands and legs from out underneath me and continued to thrust for a bit. I told him again to stop and to get off me and he told me he wasn’t finished yet. Well, yeah, he told me he wasn’t finished yet, sorry and I told him that I couldn’t handle it and he said he wanted me to come before he did. I told him I already had. I hadn’t really, I just wanted him off me and he wasn’t listening to “No.” And then he tri – pulled out and tried to put his penis in my arse. At this point, he started fumbling around released his press – the pressure from my back to the point that I was able to get my hand around behind me and grab hold of him.And you say you grabbed hold of him? What are you referring to?---I grabbed his penis.And which hand did you use to grab his penis?---My left hand.And what did you do then?---I squeezed pretty hard. I only held for less than five seconds. Enough – when I heard he was in pain, I let go. I didn’t want to injure him; I just wanted it stopped.And where did you get that indication from?---Which indication, sorry?That he was in pain?---I could just hear he was in pain. He made, sort of, a painful noise, almost like a groan.And what did you do?---I was able to get myself up to the end of the bed, I rolled back over, onto my back, in sort of a seated position, pushed backwards, up the back of the bed.And you indicated towards the end of the bed?---Yep.Are you referring to the – which side of the bed are you referring to?---The bedhead, back towards the wall.And then what happened?---And then he knelt one knee on the end of the bed, reached up and grabbed my legs and pulled me back down. I started grabbing for the sheets that were up the top, but nothing held as such. He pulled me back down; he put himself back in me.You say he pulled you back down. How did he do that?---He grabbed my thighs and just – as he stepped his knee of the bed, pulled down with his hands.And then what happened?---And then he put himself back in me, was thrusting a bit more, flipped me again and next minute, pulled out and ejaculated on my back.You said he put himself in you. What do you - - -?---His penis in my vagina.And you indicated he ejaculated on your back?---Yes, that is correct.And what happened then?---He put his hand on my lower back and told me not to move. He went out of the room, wasn’t very long at all, he came back with a box of tissues, quickly wiped my back, left the room again. I waited a little bit, till I knew he wasn’t coming straight back and I got myself up. I got dressed, walked out to the loun – lounge room, as I was still pulling on my jumper, to go get my phone, which was still on the couch. I grabbed my phone, I text my friend GL, telling me that – get – asking her to send me a message telling me that I needed to come home early. She responded something saying, “Is that exactly what you want me to say?” I told her what I wanted her to say and she sent me a message back saying, “I’m so sorry to do this. I need to leave early. Can you please come home now.” I showed that message to Eddie[7], who had joined me back on the couch.At what point did he return to the couch?---He returned to the couch just as I’d told GL what I wanted her to say and put my phone down.And where was he and where were you positioned on the couch?---He came back in. I was still standing when he came back in. He came back in, sort of sat down closest to the door, grabbed my hand and sort of directed me force – not so much forcefully, but with intent to pull me down to the couch, just to sit down and, yeah, I was on the left-hand side of him.What happened after you showed the message?---After I showed the message, I left. I walked out the door; he followed me out. He pulled me back towards him, gave me a hug, went to kiss me again, but I turned my head. He ended up kissing my cheek, told me to let him know when I get home and that we should do it again sometime and whatnot and I told him I would. I got in the car and I left.Did you consent to having sexual intercourse with Mr Sharifi Rad?---No, I didn’t.”[8][7]The appellant used the name “Eddie”: Transcript at 1-19 l 45.[8]Transcript at 1-16 l 20 to 1-19 l 22.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.