CHILDRENS COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CITATION:
R v PLP [2019] QChC 38
PARTIES:
R
v
PLP
(Applicant)
FILE NO/S:
416/2019
DIVISION:
Childrens Court
PROCEEDING:
Sentence review
ORIGINATING COURT:
Townsville Childrens Court
DELIVERED ON:
6 November 2019 (delivered ex tempore)
DELIVERED AT:
Brisbane Childrens Court
HEARING DATE:
6 November 2019
JUDGE:
Dearden DCJ
ORDER:
(1) Application for sentence review granted.
(2) Set aside the sentence of a two month detention order to be served by way of a three month conditional release order imposed at the Townsville Childrens Court on 6 August 2019.
(3) Substitute with the following orders:
(a) 12-month probation order in respect of all offences; and
(b) pursuant to Youth Justice Act 1992 (Qld) s 175(1)(db), order that the child participate in a restorative justice process as directed by the chief executive.
(4) No convictions are recorded.
CATCHWORDS:
CRIMINAL LAW – SENTENCE – SENTENCING OF JUVENILES – application for sentence review – where the applicant was sentenced to two months detention to be served by way of a three month conditional release order for several charges – where the applicant had a recent and relevant criminal history – where the applicant had served 15 days in pre-sentence custody – where the presentence report outlined the difficulties of the applicant’s childhood and alternative sentence options – whether the sentence was excessive in all the circumstances
LEGISLATION:
Youth Justice Act 1992 (Qld) s 118, s 122, s 150, s 175
CASES:
COUNSEL:
L Barnes (sol) for the applicant
T O’Brien (sol) for the respondent
SOLICITORS:
Legal Aid Queensland for the applicant
Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions for the respondent
HIS HONOUR: This is an application for sentence review by the applicant, PLP, in respect of the following matters:
(1)attempted enter premises with intent to commit indictable offence (on or about 06/07/2019);
(2)attempted enter premises with intent to commit indictable offence (06/07/2019);
(3)enter premises with intent (06/07/2019);
(4)enter premises and commit indictable offence by break (07/07/2019); and
(5)enter premises and commit indictable offences by break (08/07/2019).[1]
[1] Application for sentence review filed 2 September 2019; Exhibit A – Affidavit of Leisa Barnes, affirmed 1 November 2019.
The applicant entered a plea of guilty on 10 July 2019 and was sentenced on 6 August 2019 to a two month detention order to be served by way of a three month conditional release order, with no convictions recorded. The sentence took place at the Townsville Childrens Court.[2]
[2] Exhibit A – Affidavit of Leisa Barnes, affirmed 1 November 2019.
The applicant’s antecedents are briefly set out in the Outline of Submissions on behalf of the child. In summary, the child was born on 30 November 2004, and was accordingly 14 months and seven months at the time of the offending and 14 years and eight months at the time of sentence. Critically, he had spent 15 days in pre-sentence custody as at the sentence date, and has a…
Continue reading R v PLP
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- R v PLP [2019] QChC 38
- Case
- [2019] QChC 38
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue for the court to determine was whether the sentence imposed was excessive in all the circumstances. The court considered the presentence report, the difficulties of the applicant's childhood, and alternative sentence options. The court noted that the applicant had served 15 days in pre-sentence custody and had a recent and relevant criminal history. The court concluded that the sentence was excessive in all the circumstances and granted the application for sentence review.
The court set aside the original sentence and substituted it with a 12-month probation order in respect of all offences and ordered the respondent to participate in a restorative justice process as directed by the chief executive. The court made no order as to convictions. The court found that the original sentence was excessive in all the circumstances and that the substituted orders were more appropriate for the respondent's circumstances. The court considered the best interests of the respondent and the community in making its decision.
Orders
Orders of the court
(1) Application for sentence review granted.
(2) Set aside the sentence of a two month detention order to be served by way of a three month conditional release order imposed at the Townsville Childrens Court on 6 August 2019.
(3) Substitute with the following orders:
(a) 12-month probation order in respect of all offences; and
(b) pursuant to Youth Justice Act 1992 (Qld) s 175(1)(db), order that the child participate in a restorative justice process as directed by the chief executive.
(4) No convictions are recorded.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.