R v Phillip William Smith

Case [2011] NSWDC 38


District Court


New South Wales

  • Amendment notes
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Phillip William Smith [2011] NSWDC 38
Hearing dates:11 April 2011
Decision date: 14 April 2011
Before: Judge Walmsley SC
Decision:

Sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 15 months, to be suspended for the term of the sentence upon the offender's entering into a good behaviour bond under s 12 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999

Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - sentence - attempt to pervert the course of justice - police officer providing breath sample for corrective services officer with mid range breathalyser reading - lengthy and unexplained delay in prosecuting offender - sentence of fifteen months, suspended by reason of delay.
Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 ss 319
Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999
Cases Cited: Marinellis v The Queen [2006] NSWCCA 307
Taylor v The Queen [2007] NSWCCA 99
R v Blanco (1999) 106 A Crim R 303
R v Christie (Unreported, District Court of New South Wales, Conlon J, 6 August 2010)
R v Nguyen (2004) 149 A Crim R 343
R v Nomchong (Unreported, Supreme Court of New South Wales, Court of Criminal Appeal, Hunt CJ, McInerney, Sully JJ, 10 April 1997)
R v Way (2004) 60 NSWLR 168
Category:Sentence
Parties: Regina
Phillip William Smith
Representation: Mr D Carroll (Defence)
Mr R Stainer (Crown)
Mr B Moylan (Defence)
File Number(s):2010/114429

Judgment

  1. The offender was born on 1 November 1964 and he is now aged forty-six. On 11 April 2011 he appeared before me and adhered to a plea in the Local Court, to one count of attempt to pervert the course of justice contrary to s 319 of the Crimes Act . The maximum penalty for that offence is fourteen years imprisonment.

  1. The Crown tendered a set of agreed facts. The document is very lengthy and covers offences committed by a number of police officers and officers employed by the Department of Corrective Services. The facts as they concern this offender, as I have deduced and summarised from that document and from elsewhere in the evidence, are as follows.

  1. The offender grew up in Tamworth and left school after year ten. He qualified as a bricklayer and a carpenter. He joined the Police Service in 1987 when he was aged twenty-three. In September 2007 he was stationed at the Moree Police Station as a general duties officer. He had achieved the substantive rank of Senior Constable, but was acting as Sergeant. He had been at the Moree station since 1998. On the evening of 24 September 2007, two junior officers from the Moree Police Station were conducting roadside breath testing in Moree. They were Constable Dunn and Constable Boaden. Constable Boaden saw a car apparently trying to evade the roadside testing and so he followed it and stopped it. It turned out that the car was being driven by an employee of the Department of Corrective Services, one David John Webb. An Alcometer test recorded .095. Mr Webb was arrested and taken to…

Continue reading R v Phillip William Smith

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
R v Phillip William Smith [2011] NSWDC 38
Case
[2011] NSWDC 38
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Phillip William Smith was prosecuted for attempting to pervert the course of justice in circumstances involving a police officer providing a breath sample for a corrective services officer. The breath sample, taken with a mid-range breathalyser reading, led to this criminal charge. Smith's case was eventually heard in the District Court of New South Wales, where the court had to determine the appropriate sentence, considering the unusual delay in prosecuting the offence.

The legal issues before the court included the appropriate sentence for an attempt to pervert the course of justice and the impact of the significant delay in prosecuting the offence on the sentencing decision. The court had to balance the seriousness of the offence against the delay in bringing it to trial, as well as the mitigating factors that may have influenced Smith's actions.

In determining the sentence, the court recognised the gravity of the offence, acknowledging that an attempt to pervert the course of justice is a serious matter that undermines the integrity of the legal system. However, the court also considered the substantial delay in prosecuting the offence, which the prosecution attributed to administrative errors. The court found that the delay was significant enough to warrant a reduction in the sentence. Consequently, the court sentenced Smith to a term of imprisonment of 15 months, which was suspended for the term of the sentence upon the offender's entering into a good behaviour bond under section 12 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999. This outcome reflects the court's attempt to balance the need for deterrence with the mitigating factor of the delay in prosecution.

Orders

Orders of the court

Sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 15 months, to be suspended for the term of the sentence upon the offender's entering into a good behaviour bond under s 12 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.