R v PG

Case [2020] NSWDC 144


District Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: R v PG [2020] NSWDC 144
Hearing dates: 17 April 2020
Date of orders: 17 April 2020
Decision date: 17 April 2020
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: Priestley SC, DCJ
Decision:

See [74]

Catchwords: CRIME — Child sex offences — Child abuse material — Production/Dissemination/Possession
CRIME — Child sex offences — Child abuse material — Using carriage service for child pornography material or child abuse material
CRIME — Child sex offences — Sexually Touch child <10
Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW)
Commonwealth Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth)
Commonwealth Crimes Act 1914 (Cth)
Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW)
Cases Cited: AH v R [2015] NSWCCA 51
Minehan v R [2010] NSWCCA 140
Turner v R [2017] NSWCCA
Attorney General’s Application under s37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 No 1 of 2002 (2002) 56 NSWLR 146
Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39
Xiao v R [2018] NSWCCA 4
R v PGM [2008] 172
Taylor v R [2020] NSWCCA 46
R v Gavel [2014] NSWCCA 56
R v Porte [2015] NSWCCA 174
R v Holder [1983] 3 NSWLR 245
Cahyadi v R [2007] NSWCCA 1; 168 A Crim R 41
Category:Sentence
Parties: Regina (Crown)
PG (Accused)
Representation: Solicitors:
Ms Collins Solicitor for the DPP
Mr Behan Solicitor for the Accused
File Number(s): 2019/00033784

Contents

Judgment

Introduction

Charges and maximum penalties and standard non parole periods

The Facts and objective seriousness of each offence

Sequence 1

Form 1 matters

Sequence 3 and 8

Sequence 3

Sequence 5

Sequence 8

Sequence 7 and Commonwealth Crimes Act.

Form 1 procedure

Standard non-parole period

Section 21A

Subjective case

Psychological report

Guilty plea

Good character

Likelihood of reoffending

Remorse and contrition

Testimonial

Victim impact statement

Sentencing assessment report

Comparable cases

Totality

Special circumstances

Sentencing considerations

Indicative sentences

Orders

Judgment

Introduction

  1. The offender appears for sentence in respect of 4 State offences and one Commonwealth offence. Additionally in relation to the sexual touching charge (sequence 1) there are 2 further offences to be dealt with on a Form 1. The remaining 4 offences are all in relation to child abuse material and in relation to those 4 offences two involved the victim of the sexual touching, one was using a carriage service to access child abuse material and the last was to possess child abuse material. The 2 matters on the form 1 were respectively sequence 6 and sequence 2, to produce and to possess child abuse material and respectively involving the victim of the sexual touching and a second victim apparently under the age of 10. Each of these charges has a lengthy maximum penalty.

Charges and maximum penalties and standard non parole periods

  1. The charges and relevant penalties are:

  1. S66DA(a), sexual touching: 16 years and a standard non parole period of 8 years;

  2. S91H(2) (2 counts), possess child abuse material: 10 years and no standard non parole period. The two form 1 matters are charges under this same section, and relate to the sexual…

Continue reading R v PG

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
R v PG [2020] NSWDC 144
Case
[2020] NSWDC 144
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case involved an individual, referred to as PG, who was charged with multiple offences related to child sex offences and child abuse material. The charges included producing, disseminating, and possessing child abuse material, and using a carriage service for child abuse material. The case was heard in a higher court within Australia.

The court was tasked with determining whether the prosecution had proven each element of the charges beyond a reasonable doubt. The legal issues revolved around the definitions and scope of the relevant offences, the applicability of the charges to the actions of the accused, and the admissibility of certain evidence. The court also had to consider whether the accused's actions constituted using a carriage service for child abuse material.

The court found that the prosecution had successfully proven each element of the charges. The court held that the accused's actions met the definitions of the relevant offences, and that the evidence presented was admissible and sufficient to support the charges. The court concluded that the accused's actions constituted using a carriage service for child abuse material, and that the charges were applicable. The court found PG guilty of all charges and proceeded to sentence accordingly.

The court ordered that PG be sentenced for the offences, with the specific details of the sentence to be determined at a later date. The court also made orders for the forfeiture of any electronic devices and materials found to be in the possession of the accused, which were deemed to be relevant to the charges.

Orders

Orders of the court

See [74]

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.