SUPREME COURT OF THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY
| Case Title: | R v Peric (No 3) | ||||||||||||||||
| Citation: | [2022] ACTSC 387 | ||||||||||||||||
| Hearing Date: | 8 April 2022 | ||||||||||||||||
| Decision Date: | 20 April 2022 | ||||||||||||||||
| Before: | Refshauge AJ | ||||||||||||||||
Decision: |
|
comply with the offender’s Good Behaviour obligations under
s 85 of the Crimes (Sentence Administration) Act 2005 (ACT) from the day after the end of the Drug and Alcohol Treatment Order, 20 April 2024, until the end of the total sentence, 15 October 2024, with a probation condition that he accept supervision by the Commissioner of ACT Corrective Services
or his delegate for the period of the undertaking or such lesser
period as the person supervising him considers appropriate and obey all reasonable directions of the person supervising him including as to urinalysis, counselling and treatment.
9. For the treatment and supervision part of the Drug and Alcohol Treatment Order:
a. The core conditions of the Order set out in s 80Y of the Crimes (Sentencing) Act 2005 (ACT) be hereby imposed; b. Mitchell John Peric undertake any program, treatment or counselling, urinalysis or case management that may be required by any member of the Treatment and Supervision Team and obey all reasonable directions of…
Continue reading R v Peric (No 3)
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- R v Peric (No 3) [2022] ACTSC 387
- Case
- [2022] ACTSC 387
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.