Supreme Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Paul Campbell (a pseudonym) [2017] NSWSC 1844 Hearing dates: 20 December 2017 Date of orders: 20 December 2017 Decision date: 20 December 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Hamill J Decision: Release Application Granted
Catchwords: BAIL – appeal pending in the Court of Criminal Appeal – significant portion of short sentence likely to be served before appeal heard – grounds of appeal arguable – applicant 14 year old child – accepted into new school – will miss start of school if bail refused – special or exceptional circumstances established Legislation Cited: Children’s (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987, s 6
Bail Act 2013 (NSW), ss 17, 18, 19, 22 and 26(5)Cases Cited: Director of Public Prosecutions (CTH) v Cassaniti [2006] NSWSC 1103
El Hili & Melville v R [2015] NSWCCA 146
R v Khoo [2013] NSWSC 1518
RP v R [2015] NSWCCA 215
Kentwell v The Queen (2014) 252 CLR 601; [2014] HCA 37Category: Principal judgment Parties: Paul Campbell (A pseudonym)(Applicant)
Regina (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
M. Johnson SC (Applicant)
N. Borosh (Respondent)
McGirr Lawyers (Applicant)
Department of Public Prosecutions (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/00381700
EX TEMPORE Judgment
-
The applicant for bail is a fourteen-year-old child. He cannot be identified. He was referred to by a pseudonym in the District Court and I will adopt that pseudonym.
-
On 14 December 2017, following his pleas of guilty in relation to sexual offences against two of his younger second cousins, the applicant was sentenced in the District Court to a head sentence of sixteen months with a non-parole period of eight months. The sentencing judge ordered that the offender is to be released to parole on 13 August 2018.
-
Because the applicant was sentenced on conviction on indictment and an appeal to the Court of Criminal Appeal is pending, s 22 of the Bail Act requires him to establish that there are “special or exceptional circumstances” justifying the grant of bail. The operation of this “special and exceptional circumstances” test was considered by the Court of Criminal Appeal in El Hili & Melville v R [2015] NSWCCA 146. I will not repeat the analysis of applicable principles undertaken in that case but those are the principles that I apply in considering the present application.
-
The applicant pleaded guilty to three offences and admitted four further offences which he asked to be taken into account in sentencing. He pleaded guilty to two counts of sexual intercourse with a person under the age of ten years. Those offences were very serious and involved the applicant getting a six year old child to perform fellatio on him and then performing cunnilingus on the same child. The four offences to be taken into account involved exposing himself to the same child, licking her breast, digital penetration and rubbing his penis on the younger child’s groin; those offences being aggravated indecent assaults. He also admitted digitally penetrating the child; that being another offence of having sexual intercourse…
Continue reading R v Paul Campbell (a pseudonym)
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- R v Paul Campbell (a pseudonym) [2017] NSWSC 1844
- Case
- [2017] NSWSC 1844
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the applicant had established special or exceptional circumstances that warranted the grant of bail pending appeal. The court had to consider the likelihood of the appeal being successful, the length of the sentence, the applicant's age and his prospects of rehabilitation, and the impact of refusal of bail on his education and social circumstances. The applicant argued that his young age, the arguable nature of the grounds of appeal, and the potential negative impact on his education and social development constituted special or exceptional circumstances.
Justice Smith found that the applicant had indeed established special or exceptional circumstances. The court accepted that the grounds of appeal were arguable, and that a significant portion of the applicant's sentence would be served before the appeal was heard. Furthermore, the court noted that the applicant had been accepted into a new school and that refusal of bail would cause him to miss the start of the school term, which would have a detrimental effect on his education and social development. In light of these findings, the court concluded that it was appropriate to grant bail. The court made orders granting the applicant bail, subject to certain conditions.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.