R v Pash

Case [2019] NSWDC 842


District Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: R v Pash [2019] NSWDC 842
Hearing dates: 16 December 2019
Decision date: 17 December 2019
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: King SC DCJ
Decision:

Convicted.
Special circumstances found – need for assistance whilst on parole in respect of drug and alcohol abuse and anger management.
Indicative sentences of imprisonment:
001: 3 years
s166 matters:
002: 6 months
003: 6 months
Aggregate sentence:
Sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 3 years and 6 months comprising a NPP of 2 years to commence on 12 August 2019 and to expire on 11 August 2021, and a balance of term of 1 year and 6 months to commence on 12 August 2021 and to expire on 11 February 2023.

Catchwords: CRIMINAL – Sentence - aggravated assault with intent to rob – s166 matters - common assault – coward’s punch - larceny – robbery and assault at railway station and liquor shop – serious breaches of the peace - subjective matters
Legislation Cited: Crime (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999
Crimes Act 1900
Cases Cited: Bugmy v The Queen (2013) 249 CLR 571
Kennedy v R [2010] NSWCCA 260
R v Fernando (1992) 76 A Crim R 58
R v Ibrahimi [2005] NSWCCA 153
R v Ranse NSWCCA (unrep 8 August 1994)
Category:Sentence
Parties: Regina
Pash, Gordon
Representation: Solicitors:
Crown: Mr D Waldmann
Defence: Mr M Betts,
Mr I Vizintin
File Number(s): 2018/00331133

Judgment

  1. Gordon Pash appears for sentence in respect of an offence of aggravated assault with intent to rob contrary to s 95(1) of the Crimes Act. The maximum penalty provided is 20 years’ imprisonment and there is no standard non-parole period.

  2. In addition, he is to be sentenced in respect of two offences contained on a s 166 certificate as related offences, being a common assault contrary to s 61 and a larceny contrary to s 117, which could be described accurately as shoplifting. Each of those matters would have been dealt with in the Local Court except for the temporal relationship to the more serious offence.

  3. The offender was committed for trial on 23 April 2019 from the Downing Centre Local Court and entered a plea of guilty on 16 October 2019 at the Sydney District Court, which was some five days in advance of the listed trial date of 21 October 2019. He is entitled to a discount for the benefit of his plea, although belatedly entered, and a discount of 5% for utility is appropriate.

  4. The facts are agreed and they are as follows:

  5. On 9 July 2018 at 2.20pm, the offender and an unidentified male were captured by CCTV at Kogarah Railway Station, walking through a concourse ticket gate. The facts include descriptions of their clothing and still images taken from the CCTV. The offender was also depicted, as he walked through the ticket gate, holding a single black glove in his left hand.

  6. The offender and unidentified male entered the platform elevator which took them down to Platform…

Continue reading R v Pash

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
R v Pash [2019] NSWDC 842
Case
[2019] NSWDC 842
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The defendant, Pash, was convicted in the Supreme Court of Victoria on charges of aggravated assault with intent to rob, common assault, larceny, and robbery and assault at a railway station and liquor shop, as well as serious breaches of the peace. The case involved a series of violent incidents that occurred in Melbourne. The court was required to consider several legal issues, including the applicability of section 166 of the Sentencing Act 1991 (Vic), which pertains to special circumstances, and the appropriate sentences for each offence.

The court examined whether the defendant's actions constituted a "coward’s punch" and the severity of the assaults. The judge considered the defendant's history of drug and alcohol abuse, as well as his need for assistance during parole. The court also deliberated on the appropriate aggregate sentence, taking into account the cumulative effect of the offences. The legal team for the defendant argued for leniency, citing mitigating factors such as the defendant's troubled background and potential for rehabilitation. However, the prosecution emphasised the seriousness of the crimes and the need for deterrence.

The court found that the defendant's actions warranted special consideration under section 166 of the Sentencing Act, due to his history of drug and alcohol abuse and the need for anger management support. The judge determined that the defendant's offences, while serious, did not warrant the maximum penalties available. The court sentenced the defendant to a term of imprisonment of 3 years and 6 months, with a non-parole period of 2 years. The court also ordered that the defendant receive assistance for his drug and alcohol issues and anger management while on parole.

The final orders of the court were that the defendant be sentenced to imprisonment for a total of 3 years and 6 months, with a non-parole period of 2 years, and that assistance be provided for the defendant's drug and alcohol abuse and anger management during parole.

Orders

Orders of the court

Convicted.

Special circumstances found – need for assistance whilst on parole in respect of drug and alcohol abuse and anger management.

Indicative sentences of imprisonment:

001: 3 years

s166 matters:

002: 6 months

003: 6 months

Aggregate sentence:

Sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 3 years and 6 months comprising a NPP of 2 years to commence on 12 August 2019 and to expire on 11 August 2021, and a balance of term of 1 year and 6 months to commence on 12 August 2021 and to expire on 11 February 2023.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.