District Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Parsons [2016] NSWDC 452 Hearing dates: 11 November 2016 Date of orders: 11 November 2016 Decision date: 11 November 2016 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: M L Williams SC DCJ Decision: Count 1: I impose a term of imprisonment of 2 years, to be suspended pursuant to s 12 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999.
Count 2: I impose a term of imprisonment of 18 months, to be suspended pursuant to s 12 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999: at [40]-[41]Catchwords: SENTENCING — Penalties — Suspended sentences
SENTENCING — Mitigating factors — Plea of guilty — Rehabilitation — Not fully aware of the consequences of his or her actions because of the offender’s mental condition —Remorse — Unlikely to re-offend
SENTENCING — Relevant factors on sentence — Form 1 offences — Purposes of sentencing — Moral culpability
SENTENCING — Subjective considerations on sentence — Mental illnessLegislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900
Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999Cases Cited: DPP (Cth) v De La Rosa (2010) 79 NSWLR 1
Elturk v R (2014) 239 A Crim R 584
R v Greaves [2014] NSWCCA 194
R v Whyte [2002] NSWCCA 343
Whybrow v The Queen [2008] NSWCCA 270Texts Cited: Nil Category: Sentence Parties: Regina (Crown)
Matthew Parsons (Offender)Representation: Mr D Curran (Crown)
Ms N Mikhaiel (Counsel for the Offender)
File Number(s): 2015/250182 Publication restriction: Nil
Judgment
-
The parents of Matthew Parsons sit here in Court today to hear him being sentenced for serious criminal offences in circumstances where they sadly acknowledge that their decision to stop his psychotic medication was a mistake which led to him attempting suicide while driving a motor vehicle. It is, as both counsel have indicated, an extremely unusual case and one not contemplated by or considered in any of the guideline judgments.
-
The circumstances are graphically depicted in photographs, being exhibit 2, taken after the relevant incident, which show that at about 9.30am on 30 June 2015, Mr Parsons, who is now 32 years of age, was driving his Holden sedan along Carter Street, Homebush Bay, a 50 kilometre zone.
-
He accelerated in excess of the posted speed limit, according to a witness who was travelling behind him, without warning, he changed lanes into a west-bound lane. The witness applied his brakes so that Mr Parsons could come back into the east-bound lane, as he could see an oncoming truck, but the offender’s vehicle collided with this pantechnicon truck. There were three passengers in the truck. The truck rolled over onto its side. Mr Parsons did not apply his brakes.
-
CCTV footage from a nearby building shows the impact and supports the version given by the witness.
-
The driver and his two passengers in the truck were trapped. Mr Parsons was spoken to by police at the scene. He said, “Why didn’t I die, I wanted to die, I didn’t wear my seatbelt”, and he had not been wearing a seatbelt. He…
Continue reading R v Parsons
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- R v Parsons [2016] NSWDC 452
- Case
- [2016] NSWDC 452
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to address several legal issues, including the consideration of Parsons' plea of guilty, his rehabilitation prospects, and his mental condition, which affected his awareness of the consequences of his actions. Additionally, the court needed to evaluate Parsons' remorse and the likelihood of him re-offending. These factors were weighed against the purposes of sentencing, including moral culpability and the specific nature of Form 1 offences. The court also needed to consider the subjective impact of Parsons' mental illness on his sentencing.
The court found that Parsons' guilty plea, his rehabilitation prospects, and his remorse were significant mitigating factors. It was also noted that Parsons was not fully aware of the consequences of his actions due to his mental condition, and he was unlikely to re-offend. The court concluded that a suspended sentence would be appropriate, as it would allow Parsons to rehabilitate without the immediate imposition of a custodial sentence. The court determined that Parsons should serve a term of imprisonment of two years for the first count and 18 months for the second count, both to be suspended under section 12 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999.
The court's final orders were that Parsons would serve a term of imprisonment of two years for the first count and 18 months for the second count, both to be suspended. This decision reflects the court's consideration of all relevant mitigating and aggravating factors, and its conclusion that a suspended sentence was in the best interests of Parsons and society.
Orders
Orders of the court
Count 1: I impose a term of imprisonment of 2 years, to be suspended pursuant to s 12 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999.
Count 2: I impose a term of imprisonment of 18 months, to be suspended pursuant to s 12 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999: at [40]-[41]
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.