Local Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Mohamed Abbasher Fageer [2017] NSWLC 18 Hearing dates: 5 October 2017 Decision date: 14 November 2017 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Judge Graeme Henson, Chief Magistrate Decision: See [23] and [26]
Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Sentencing – particular offences – dangerous driving occasioning death – failure to keep a proper lookout – negligence more than momentary inattention - factors relevant to sentencing – degree of moral culpability – impact on community and victim – need for general deterrence- prior good character - plea of guilty – remorse – sentence other than imprisonment appropriate – suitable for community service Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) ss 3A(g), 5, 21A(3)
Road Transport Act 2013 (NSW) ss117(1)(a), 205(2)(d), 225Cases Cited: Bonsu v R [2009] NSWCCA 316
DPP v Pelletier [2014] NSWLC 9
Guideline Judgment Concerning the Offence of High Range Prescribed Concentration of Alcohol Under Section 9(4) of the Road Transport (Safety and Traffic Management) Act 1999 (No. 3 of 2002) [2004] NSWCCA 303
R v Borkowski [2009] NSWCCA 102
R v Pyritz (1998) 29 MVR 90
R v Foster (2001) 33 MVR 565
R v Whyte (2002) 55 NSWLR 252; [2002] NSWCCA 343
R v Youkhana [2005] NSWCCA 231Category: Sentence Parties: Director of Public Prosecutors (prosecution)
Mohamed Abbasher Fageern (defendant)Representation: E Curran (for the prosecution)
J Sutton (for the defendant)
File Number(s): 2016/00386928
Judgment
-
On 23 December 2016 Police issued a Court Attendance Notice against the offender for the offences of Dangerous Driving Occasioning Death and Negligent Driving Occasioning Death. Given the more serious offence is one that can only be dealt with on indictment, conduct of the proceedings was assumed by the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (the DPP). In accordance with procedures established under the Court’s Practice Note, a period of time was allowed following service of the brief to enable negotiations to take place between the prosecution and defence.
-
On 27 July 2017 the DPP withdrew the strictly indictable charge. The defendant entered a plea of guilty to the lesser summary charge of Negligent Driving Occasioning Death. Section 117(1)(a) of the Road Transport Act 2013 (NSW) (the RT Act) provides that the maximum penalty for this offence is 18 months imprisonment and/or a fine of up to $3300. Upon conviction Section 205(2)(d) provides for an automatic disqualification of license for 3 years with a mandatory minimum period of 12 months.
-
Tragedy comes in many forms. On occasions it is shared inasmuch as the consequences affecting those regarded by the law as responsible as well as those who have to bear the outcome more acutely and do so long after the shock of the event has passed. For victims of tragedy, beyond acknowledging the impact of the crime in a legal and human sense the legal system can do very little. The pity of this occurs when tragedy follows a breach of the law in the simplest of terms. Absent of malice, a contradiction…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read R v Mohamed Abbasher Fageer and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2017] NSWLC 18
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court had to consider several factors in determining the appropriate sentence. These included the degree of moral culpability, the impact on the community and the victim, the need for general deterrence, Fageer's prior good character, his plea of guilty, and his expressed remorse. The court recognised Fageer's plea of guilty and his remorse as mitigating factors, but also had to weigh the gravity of the offence, which resulted in the death of another individual. The court found that while imprisonment was a possible option, the circumstances warranted a sentence that would not only punish but also rehabilitate the offender and serve the broader interests of the community.
After considering all relevant factors, the court determined that a sentence other than imprisonment would be appropriate. The court found that community service would be a suitable alternative, given Fageer's remorse, his plea of guilty, and the need to rehabilitate him while also serving the interests of the community. The court ordered that Fageer be sentenced to a term of community service, reflecting the balance between punishment, rehabilitation, and deterrence.
Orders
Orders of the court
See [23] and [26]
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.