R v Micah

Case [2019] NSWDC 626


District Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: R v Micah [2019] NSWDC 626
Hearing dates: 2 August 2019, 5 August 2019
Decision date: 08 August 2019
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: Norrish QC DCJ
Decision:

Taking into account the matter on a Form 1; sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 1 year 10 months to be served by way of an Intensive Correction Order.

Catchwords: CRIME – Sentence - supply prohibited drug –methylenedioxymethamphetamine – not less than commercial quantity – issue of parity – sentencing in relation to co-offenders – equal justice – street level supplier – messenger– aggravating factor – financial reward, but not in possession of substantial sums of cash, drugs or drug related paraphernalia – provided assistance to police -
CRIME – participate in criminal group, contribute to criminal activity and knowingly deal with proceeds crime
Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999, s54A(2), s54B(2), s3A, s21A, Pt 4 Div 1A, s98(3), s 7(1),
Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985, 25(2)
Cases Cited: DPP(Cth) v Gow [2015] NSWCCA 208
Hili and Jones v R [2010] HCA 45
Jimmy v R [2010] NSWCCA 60
Postiglione v R (1997) 198 CLR 395
R v Mostapha Ali [2016] NSWDC 173
R v Olbrich [1999] HCA 54
Category:Sentence
Parties: Regina (Crown)
Billy Ndegway Micah (offender)
Representation:

Counsel:
Mr C Taylor (Crown)

  Solicitors:
Mr Singh (Defendant)
File Number(s): 2018/00112324
Publication restriction: No

Judgment

  1. This is a very evenly balanced matter. I have paid very close heed to what the learned Crown has said and what counsel has said. I have ultimately determined that I should impose a term of imprisonment that can be served by way of an Intensive Correction Order and I propose to make that order.

  2. The term of imprisonment will be one year, ten months, this is in the context of the matters I am required to consider. A rounding down of the starting figure for the term of imprisonment for you was two and half years and I will give my reasons for coming to that decision now.

  3. The prisoner, Mr Micah, appears today for sentence in relation to an offence for which he was committed for sentence to the District Court. That charge was that he between 1 December 2017 and 2 February 2018 at Surry Hills in the State of New South Wales did supply an amount of a prohibited drug, to wit 3,4 methylenedioxymethamphetamine of a weight of 194.08 grams being an amount that was not less than the commercial quantity applicable to that prohibited drug. This is an offence contrary to s 25(2) Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985, it carries a maximum penalty of 20 years’ imprisonment and/or 3,500 penalty units. It has a standard non-parole period of ten years’ imprisonment.

  4. I am required to take into account on a Form 1 the offence described as the sequence 2 offence relating to this prisoner. That is an offence, that the prisoner, between 1 December 2017 and 2 February 2018, at Surry…

Continue reading R v Micah

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
R v Micah [2019] NSWDC 626
Case
[2019] NSWDC 626
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Micah was convicted for supplying a commercial quantity of the prohibited drug methylenedioxymethamphetamine. The court was required to consider several legal issues, including the principle of equal justice, the role of Micah in the drug supply chain, and any aggravating or mitigating factors. Micah was not a major player in the drug supply operation but acted as a street-level supplier and messenger. The court noted that while Micah received a financial reward for his role, he did not possess substantial sums of cash, drugs, or drug-related paraphernalia at the time of his arrest. Additionally, Micah provided assistance to the police, which was considered a mitigating factor. The court had to balance these factors against the seriousness of the offence and the need for general deterrence. After weighing all relevant considerations, the court sentenced Micah to a term of imprisonment of 1 year and 10 months, to be served by way of an Intensive Correction Order. This sentence reflects the court's assessment of Micah's role in the criminal activity and the mitigating factors present in his case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Taking into account the matter on a Form 1; sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 1 year 10 months to be served by way of an Intensive Correction Order.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.