Actions
Cases Citing This Decision
13
-
R v Winters
[2022] ACTSC 371
Citation 1
(Para 13)
…nd mental illness. There was no evidence of how he went at the program. He has also engaged in some other programs as SMART recovery (see R v McGrail [2016] ACTSC 142 at [78]–[80]), a program referred to in evidence as ADAPT and some counselling at Directions Health Services.…
-
R v John
[2017] ACTSC 144
Citation 2
(Para 1)
…ng the SMART Recovery program. She has expressed an interest in the SMART Recovery course at Directions, a program I described in R v McGrail [2016] ACTSC 142 at [78]-[80]. As I understand it, she has been attending that program.…
-
R v Eyles (No 3)
[2017] ACTSC 1
Citation 3
(Para 1)
…Mr Eyles has also been attending the SMART Recovery Program, a drug rehabilitation program I described in R v McGrail [2016] ACTSC 142 at [78]-[80]. While his attendance has not been constant, he is described as committing to the Program when he does attend.…
-
R v Ngerengere (No 5)
[2016] ACTSC 388
Citation 4
(Para 1)
…ity was explored. That would involve two principal aspects: attendance at the Smart Recovery Program, a Program that is well described in R v McGrail [2016] ACTSC 142 at [78]-[80]. That would be supplemented by attendance at Alcoholics Anonymous. There are other counselling options but all have waiting lists. I am…
-
R v Goboly
[2016] ACTSC 322
Citation 5
(Para 1)
…Mr Goboly has been assessed as suitable for the SMART Recovery Program. I have described the Program in R v McGrail [2016] ACTSC 142 [78]-[80]. He has also been assessed as suitable for the Adult Sex Offender Program and the Cognitive Self-Change Program; both Programs conducted by ACT Corrective Services.…
-
Law v Ilievski
[2016] ACTSC 291
Citation 6
(Para 1)
…He was assessed as suitable for the SMART Recovery Program and was placed on a waiting list. I have described that Program in R v McGrail [2016] ACTSC 142 at [78]-[80].…
-
R v Ngerengere (No 4)
[2016] ACTSC 300
Citation 7
(Para 1)
…alysis on Monday. He agreed to do so. He also planned to attend a SMART Recovery Program on Tuesday. I have described that Program in R v McGrail [2016] ACTSC 142 at [78]-[80].…
-
R v TL (No 2)
[2016] ACTSC 289
Citation 8
(Para 1)
…e has also completed an eight week anger management group program. He has been attending the SMART Recovery, a program I described in R v McGrail [2016] ACTSC 142 at [78]-[80]. He feels confident that he can remain abstinent when he returns to the community.…
-
R v Matthew Peter White (No 3)
[2016] ACTSC 285
Citation 9
…Kekalainen (No 2) [2015] ACTSC 369 R v Kristiansen [2015] ACTSC 159 R v Matthew Peter White [2015] ACTSC 254 R v McMahon [2014] ACTSC 280 R v McGrail [2016] ACTSC 142 R v Verdins [2007] VSCA 201 R v White [2014] ACTSC 158 Saga v Reid [2010] ACTSC 59…
-
R v Ware
[2016] ACTSC 264
Citation 10
(Para 1)
…he Canberra Men’s Centre, now Everyman. I also required him to participate in the SMART Recovery Program, a program I have described in R v McGrail [2016] ACTSC 142 at [78]-[80].…
-
R v Charles
[2016] ACTSC 177
Citation 11
(Para 1)
…The Bail Act is now a somewhat complex statute, with categories of bail and thresholds and limitations. See R v McGrail [2016] ACTSC 142 at [33]; R v Celeski [2016] ACTSC 140 at [23]-[34].…
-
R v Celeski
[2016] ACTSC 140
Citation 12
(Para 1)
…unless the court is satisfied that a refusal is justified having regard to the considerations set out in s 22 or s 23 as applicable. See R v McGrail [2016] ACTSC 142.…
-
R v Subasic (No 2)
[2023] ACTSC 79
Citation 13
…ry [1999] NSWCCA 111; 46 NSWLR 346 R v JM [2014] ACTSC 380 R v Johnson [2018] ACTSC 137 R v Marschall [2002] NSWCCA 197; 129 A Crim R 381 R v McGrail [2016] ACTSC 142 R v NF (No 1) [2016] ACTSC 216 R v Nona [2015] ACTSC 136 R v Pikula [2015] ACTSC 380 R v Qutami [2001] NSWCCA 353; 127 A Crim R 369 R v Reid (No 1) […
Statutory Material Cited
0