R -v- McDONALD [2000] WASCA 336
| SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA | Citation No: | [2000] WASCA 336 | |
| COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL | |||
| Case No: | CCA:133/2000 | 15 SEPTEMBER 2000 | |
| Coram: | PIDGEON J WALLWORK J PARKER J | 8/11/00 | |
| 12 | Judgment Part: | 1 of 1 | |
| Result: | Extension of time to appeal refused | ||
| PDF Version |
| Parties: | THE QUEEN LISA MARY McDONALD |
Catchwords: | Criminal law Sentence Manslaughter 3-1/2 years imprisonment suspended for 2 years Crown appeal Extension of time |
Legislation: | Sentencing Act 1995, s 76(1) |
Case References: | Bond v The Queen (1999) 74 ALJR 597 Dinsdale v The Queen [2000] HCA 54 Gavin v The Queen (1992) 6 WAR 195 Lowndes v The Queen (1999) 195 CLR 665 Narkle v The Queen, unreported; CCA SCt of WA; Library No 6108; 2 December 1985 Nicolakis v The Queen, unreported; CCA SCt of WA; Library No 7184; 30 June 1998 R v Allpass (1993) 72 A Crim R 561 R v Aloia [1983] WAR 133 R v Churchill [2000] WASCA 230 R v Clarke [1966] 2 VR 520 R v Grein [1989] WAR 178 R v Peterson [1984] WAR 329 Anderson v The Queen (1997) 92 A Crim R 348 Boyle v The Queen (1987) 34 A Crim R 202 Dao v The Queen, unreported; CCA SCt of WA; Library No 990015; 22 January 1999 Kauhanen v The Queen [1999] WASCA 14 O'Brien v Ritchie, unreported; CCA SCt of WA; Library No 990123; 17 March 1999 O'Gorman v The Queen, unreported; CCA SCt of WA; Library No 980744; 18 December 1998 R v Delaurentis, unreported; CCA SCt of WA; Library No 950052; 14 February 1995 R v Dickson, unreported; CCA SCt of WA; Library No 990203; 23 April 1999 R v Dinsdale, unreported; CCA SCt of WA; Library No 990021; 2 February 1998 R v Hallocoglu (1992) 29 NSWLR 67 R v Hodges [1999] WASCA 278 R v Marple, unreported; SCt of Vic; 27 April 1999 R v P (1992) 39 FCR 276 R v Partridge, unreported; FCA; 29 May 1998 R v Rushby (1977) 1 NSWLR 594 Rowe (1991) 52 A Crim R 1968 Thompson v The Queen (1999) 165 ALR 219 |
JURISDICTION : SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA TITLE OF COURT : COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL CITATION : R -v- McDONALD [2000] WASCA 336 CORAM : PIDGEON J
- WALLWORK J
PARKER J
- Applicant
AND
LISA MARY McDONALD
Respondent
Catchwords:
Criminal law - Sentence - Manslaughter - 3-1/2 years imprisonment suspended for 2 years - Crown appeal - Extension of time
Legislation:
Sentencing Act 1995, s 76(1)
Result:
Extension of time to appeal refused
(Page 2)
Representation:
Counsel:
Applicant : Mr G T W Tannin & Mr F Sunderland
Respondent : Mr S M Brennan
Solicitors:
Applicant : State Crown Solicitor
Respondent : Shane Michael Brennan
Case(s) referred to in judgment(s):
Bond v The Queen (1999) 74 ALJR 597
Continue reading R v McDonald
Sign in free to access the full text
Details
- AGLC
- R v McDonald [2000] WASCA 336
- Case
- [2000] WASCA 336
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The matter before the court was an appeal by the Crown against the sentence imposed on the respondent, McDonald, who was convicted of manslaughter. The primary issue before the court was whether the Crown's appeal against the sentence should be dismissed for being out of time. The respondent had been sentenced to 3-1/2 years imprisonment, suspended for two years, and the Crown sought to appeal this sentence as manifestly inadequate. The Crown's application for an extension of time to appeal was based on alleged late receipt of the sentencing remarks of the sentencing judge and the time taken to obtain legal advice.
The court considered the relevant provisions of the Criminal Appeal Act and noted that the Crown had not made an application for an extension of time within the prescribed period. The court further found that the Crown's delay in applying for an extension of time was not sufficiently explained, and that the late receipt of the sentencing remarks did not justify the delay. The court held that the Crown had failed to establish any exceptional circumstances that would warrant an extension of time, and accordingly dismissed the Crown's application for an extension of time to appeal. The appeal against the sentence was therefore dismissed.
The court considered the relevant provisions of the Criminal Appeal Act and noted that the Crown had not made an application for an extension of time within the prescribed period. The court further found that the Crown's delay in applying for an extension of time was not sufficiently explained, and that the late receipt of the sentencing remarks did not justify the delay. The court held that the Crown had failed to establish any exceptional circumstances that would warrant an extension of time, and accordingly dismissed the Crown's application for an extension of time to appeal. The appeal against the sentence was therefore dismissed.
Orders
Orders of the court
Extension of time to appeal refused
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.