R v Martin

Case

[1984] HCA 23

11 April 1984

No judgment structure available for this case.

HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Gibbs C.J., Murphy, Brennan, Deane and Dawson JJ.

THE QUEEN v. MARTIN

11 April 1984

Decision


GIBBS C.J., MURPHY, BRENNAN, DEANE and DAWSON JJ. The respondent in this case, who was not legally aided, seeks an order for costs. The Crown has unsuccessfully sought special leave to appeal from a decision of the Court of Criminal Appeal of South Australia which set aside the conviction of the respondent for manslaughter and ordered a new trial. While it is the established practice that an unsuccessful applicant for special leave to appeal against a conviction is not ordered to pay the costs of the Crown, it does not follow that the Crown should not be ordered to pay the costs when it makes an unsuccessful application for special leave to appeal against a decision of a Court of Criminal Appeal allowing an appeal by a convicted person. In the circumstances of the present case we consider that the Crown should be ordered to pay the costs of the respondent.

Orders


Order that the Crown pay the respondent's costs of the
application.

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document

Most Recent Citation
The Queen v Halis [2021] VCC 1277

Cases Citing This Decision

65

Aubrey v The Queen [2017] HCA 18
KBT v The Queen [1997] HCA 54
KBT v The Queen [1997] HCA 54
Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0