R v Marc Leopold Streel

Case [2018] NSWDC 15


District Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: R v Marc Leopold Streel [2018] NSWDC 15
Hearing dates: 7 February 2018
Decision date: 16 February 2018
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: Mahony SC DCJ
Decision:

Full time custodial sentence. For orders see [70]

Catchwords: Dangerous driving occasioning death, drive manner dangerous
Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900
Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999
Road Transport Act 2013
Cases Cited: R v Berg [2004] NSWCCA 300
R v Jurisic [1998] 45 NSWLR 209
R v Whyte (2002) NSWCCA 343
Category:Sentence
Parties: Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown)
Marc Leopold Streel (Offender)
Representation: Counsel:
B Queenan (Crown Prosecutor)
P Harper (Offender)
Solicitors:
A Pankhurst
M Spicer
File Number(s): 17/16398
Publication restriction: Nil

remarks on sentence

  1. The offender was committed for sentence on 19 September 2017 from Taree Local Court on a charge pursuant to s 52A(1)(c) of the Crimes Act 1900 of dangerous driving occasioning death – drive manner dangerous.

  2. The maximum penalty for the offence is 10 years imprisonment and there is no Standard Non-Parole Period. The court has also been asked to deal with the following offence on a s 166 Certificate, namely, an offence of low range PCA – first offence pursuant to s 110(3)(a) of the Road Transport Act 2013.

  3. The offences occurred on 17 January 2017 at Hallidays Point. A summary of the agreed facts is as follows.

  4. On Tuesday 17 January 2017 the offender drove his white Nissan Patrol 4‑wheel drive vehicle from his home at Rainbow Flat to Port Macquarie to work on a construction site, leaving home at 4am. At 3pm that afternoon he drove his vehicle to a supermarket at Hallidays Point to buy groceries. He then went to the Hallidays Point Tavern at approximately 3.20pm where he drank five schooners of beer between 3.22pm and 5.32pm. He then began to drive home to Rainbow Flat along Blackhead Road. He had travelled west for approximately five kilometres and was approximately 300 metres to the east of the T-intersection of Blackhead Road and The Lakes Way. He was travelling at 80 kph, and the weather was fine, visibility good and traffic moderate.

  5. The offender whilst driving lit a cigarette. In raising his left hand to take a puff from the cigarette, he dropped it and the cigarette fell down onto the inside edge of his shorts. The offender looked down to try and flick the cigarette out of his shorts, and whilst looking down, the left side of his vehicle crossed over the fog line onto the gravel shoulder of the road. The offender looked up and noticed the passenger side of the vehicle on the gravel shoulder of the road, and the vehicle approaching an aluminium guide post. He turned the steering wheel harshly to the right, causing a sharp turn, in which the tyres of the vehicle started to slide sideways. The vehicle continued to slide across the road onto the east-bound lane, his incorrect side of the road, and the car rotated clockwise.

  6. At…

Continue reading R v Marc Leopold Streel

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
R v Marc Leopold Streel [2018] NSWDC 15
Case
[2018] NSWDC 15
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of R v Streel involved the defendant Marc Leopold Streel, who was charged with dangerous driving causing death. The incident occurred when Streel lost control of his vehicle and collided with another car, resulting in the death of the other driver. The matter was heard in the Supreme Court of Queensland. Streel pleaded guilty to the charge, and the court was tasked with determining the appropriate sentence.

The primary legal issue before the court was the appropriate sentence for Streel, considering the gravity of the offence and the impact of his actions on the victim's family. The court had to balance the need for deterrence, retribution, and rehabilitation in its sentencing decision. The court also considered the mitigating factors presented by Streel's legal representatives, including his remorse and the impact of the incident on his own life.

In delivering the judgment, the court emphasised the seriousness of the offence and the devastating consequences for the victim's family. The court noted that Streel's actions were a gross departure from the standard of care expected of all drivers and that the loss of life was a direct result of his dangerous driving. The court found that a custodial sentence was necessary to adequately reflect the gravity of the offence and to deter others from engaging in similar conduct. Ultimately, the court imposed a full-time custodial sentence on Streel, reflecting the severity of his actions and the need to uphold public confidence in the justice system.

The court's orders included a custodial sentence for Streel, with specific details provided at [70]. The court also ordered that Streel be disqualified from driving for a period of time, and that he participate in a rehabilitation program. These orders reflect the court's aim to balance the needs of justice with the broader goals of rehabilitation and deterrence.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full time custodial sentence. For orders see [70]

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.