District Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Malloy [2018] NSWDC 477 Hearing dates: 06 December 2018 Decision date: 06 December 2018 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: King SC DCJ Decision: Convicted.
Special circumstances found – age, 1st significant time in custody, need for a longer parole period to reintegrate into the community.
Form 1 matters taken into account on sentence imposed for Count 1.
Indicative Sentences:
COUNT 1 (SEQ 12 + Form 1 matters (SEQ 7, 9, 10): imprisonment for 5 years
COUNT 2 (SEQ 6): imprisonment for 2 years
AGGREGATE SENTENCE:
Sentenced to a total term of imprisonment of 5 years and 6 months, comprising of a NPP of 3 years to commence on 30/1/18 and to expire on 29/1/21, and a balance of term of 2 years and 6 months to commence on 30/1/21 and to expire on 29/7/23.
Eligible for release to parole on 29/1/21.Catchwords: CRIMINAL – sentence - aggravated indecency, victim under 16 & under authority of offender - “representative count” - sexual intercourse-person 10 & under 16, under authority - Form 1 matters, 3 charges of indecent assault – offender victim’s stepfather – Victim Impact Statement – subjective matters Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900
Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) ActCategory: Sentence Parties: Regina
Donald James MalloyRepresentation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
Defence: Mr C Bolger
Crown: Ms M McIvor
File Number(s): 2015/00171755 Publication restriction: Non Publication Order in respect of the name of the complainant and anything that might tend to identify her
Judgment
-
HIS HONOUR: Donald Malloy appears for sentence in respect of two offences, the first of those being that between 2 August 2000 and 31 December 2000 at Coffs Harbour, he did have sexual intercourse with KS, who was then between the ages of 10 and 16, namely, 11 years, in circumstances of aggravation, namely, that KS was under the authority of Donald Malloy. That is an offence contrary to s 66C(2) of the Crimes Act 1900; the maximum penalty provided is ten years imprisonment and there is no relevant standard non-parole period.
-
The second offence is that between 1 January 2001 and 31 December 2001 at Coffs Harbour, he did commit an act of indecency towards KS who was then under the age of 16 years, namely, 11 or 12 years, in circumstances of aggravation, namely, that KS was under his authority. That offence is contrary to s 61O(1) of the Crimes Act 1900. The maximum penalty provided is five years and there is no relevant standard non-parole period.
-
When being sentenced in respect of the first count, that is, sexual intercourse with a child between 10 and 16 under authority, he asks the Court to take into account a further three offences contained on a Form 1 pursuant to s 32 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act. Those three offences are: first of all, an indecent assault when the complainant was aged 11, and each of the following two charges are of the same nature, although they involve different acts.…
Continue reading R v Malloy
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- R v Malloy [2018] NSWDC 477
- Case
- [2018] NSWDC 477
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court had to determine several legal issues, including the applicability of special circumstances such as the victim's age and the offender's status as her stepfather. The court also had to consider the impact on the victim, as evidenced by the Victim Impact Statement, and the offender’s previous criminal history. Another issue was the consideration of Form 1 matters in sentencing for certain charges. The court's task was to weigh these factors against the severity of the crimes committed.
In delivering its judgment, the court found that the special circumstances, including the age of the victim and the first significant time the offender would spend in custody, warranted consideration. The court found that the Form 1 matters, which involved previous charges of indecent assault, should be taken into account in the sentencing for the main charge of aggravated indecency. The court considered the need for a longer parole period to facilitate the offender’s reintegration into the community. The court imposed a non-parole period of 3 years for the main charge and additional sentences for the other counts, resulting in a total term of imprisonment of 5 years and 6 months.
The final orders of the court were that the defendant be sentenced to a total term of imprisonment of 5 years and 6 months. This included a non-parole period of 3 years, starting from 30 January 2018 and ending on 29 January 2021, followed by a balance of 2 years and 6 months. The defendant would be eligible for parole release on 29 January 2021.
Orders
Orders of the court
Convicted.
Special circumstances found – age, 1st significant time in custody, need for a longer parole period to reintegrate into the community.
Form 1 matters taken into account on sentence imposed for Count 1.
Indicative Sentences:
COUNT 1 (SEQ 12 + Form 1 matters (SEQ 7, 9, 10): imprisonment for 5 years
COUNT 2 (SEQ 6): imprisonment for 2 years
AGGREGATE SENTENCE:
Sentenced to a total term of imprisonment of 5 years and 6 months, comprising of a NPP of 3 years to commence on 30/1/18 and to expire on 29/1/21, and a balance of term of 2 years and 6 months to commence on 30/1/21 and to expire on 29/7/23.
Eligible for release to parole on 29/1/21.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.