BCCM Group Pty Ltd v ASAP23 Pty Ltd
[2022] SASC 141
Citation 1
(Para 27)
…erence, and in response to it, but they simply do not satisfy a minimal objective standard of a “complaint of a sexual offence”. [12] [2022] SASC 141 at [116]. [13] R v S, DD (2010) 109 SASR 46 at [100] (footnote 30) (Peek J); referred to in R v Usher (2014) 119 SASR 22 at [52] (Kourakis CJ, Peek J agreeing).…
R v Maiolo (No 3)
[2014] SASCFC 89
Citation 2
(Para 27)
…offence”. [12] [2022] SASC 141 at [116]. [13] R v S, DD (2010) 109 SASR 46 at [100] (footnote 30) (Peek J); referred to in R v Usher (2014) 119 SASR 22 at [52] (Kourakis CJ, Peek J agreeing).…
Robinson v The Queen
[1999] HCA 42
Citation 3
…9 (SA) ss 29C, 34M, referred to. R v S, DD (2010) 109 SASR 46; R v Rippey, Rippey v The King [2022] SASC 141; R v Usher (2014) 119 SASR 22; Robinson v The Queen (1999) 197 CLR 162; R v Corrigan (1998) 74 SASR 545, considered.…
R v Jones
[2013] SADC 105
Citation 4
(Para 23)
…rier of fact as to how the allegation first came to light; and ·revealing consistency of conduct on the part of the complainant.[11] [11] R v S, DD (2010) 109 SASR 46 at [4] (Duggan J, Anderson J agreeing), [98]-[99], [107]-[111] (Peek J).…