SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CITATION: R v M [2003] QCA 556 PARTIES: R
v
M
(applicant)FILE NO: CA No 359 of 2003 DC No 345 of 2003 DIVISION: Court of Appeal PROCEEDING: Sentence Application ORIGINATING
COURT:District Court at Brisbane DELIVERED EX 11 December 2003 TEMPORE ON: DELIVERED AT: Brisbane HEARING DATE: 11 December 2003 JUDGES: Williams JA, Chesterman and McMurdo JJ
Separate reasons for judgment of each member of the court,
each concurring as to the order madeORDER: Application refused CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL AND
INQUIRY AFTER CONVICTION - APPEAL AND NEW
TRIAL - APPEAL AGAINST SENTENCE - APPEAL BY
CONVICTED PERSONS - APPLICATION TO REDUCE
SENTENCE - WHEN REFUSED - PARTICULAR
OFFENCES - OFFENCES AGAINST THE PERSON - SEX
OFFENCES - indecently treating a child with a circumstance
of aggravation - whether sentence was manifestly excessive -
whether sentence should have been wholly suspended -
whether mitigating factors given adequate considerationDecember 1998, considered
R v M; ex parte AG [2002] 2 Qd R 543, considered
R v N [2001] QCA 70; CA No 215 of 2000, 6 March 2001
R v Phuc Minh Pham [1996] QCA 3, CA No 435 of 1995,
cited
R v Moffat [2003] QCA 95; CA No 439 of 2002, 11 March
2003, consideredR v L, exparte AG [1998] QCA 468; CA No 373 of 1998, 3 distinguished COUNSEL: M J Griffin SC for the applicant
B G Campbell for the respondentSOLICITORS: Price & Roobottom for the applicant
Director of Public Prosecutions (Queensland) for the
respondent
CHESTERMAN J: On 19 August 2003, the applicant pleaded guilty in the District Court to three counts of indecently treating a child with a circumstance of aggravation: namely, that in each case the child was under the age of 12. The applicant is 31
years of age. The three charges involve two children: a brother and sister whose mother is the applicant's first cousin. He lives in Sydney, but each summer he visited his
cousin's household on the Gold Coast.
The first offence occurred on a visit in November 2000. The applicant shared a sofa bed with his second cousin, a boy then 10 years old. They both went to bed at the same time and began talking about sex. This led to the applicant fondling the boy's genitals by consent and then committing an act of fellatio. He stopped as soon as the boy told him to.
The second offence occurred very late in December of 2001. It offence occurred when the family including the applicant were driving in the family car. The applicant was sitting in the back between the complainant girl and her younger sister. He rubbed the girl's labia using his own saliva for lubrication. His finger did not penetrate into the vagina but the contact was with her skin and not her clothing.
involved the female child who was then eight years of age.
The applicant claimed when interviewed by…
Continue reading R v M
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- R v M [2003] QCA 556
- Case
- [2003] QCA 556
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the severity of the offence, which involved the indecent treatment of a child. The appeal argued that the sentence was disproportionately harsh, and that the mitigating factors, including the offender's remorse, should have warranted a wholly suspended sentence. The court, however, found that the sentence was within the appropriate range for such serious offences. It was held that the sentencing judge had given adequate consideration to all mitigating factors, and there was no basis to interfere with the sentence imposed.
Given the court's findings, the appeal was dismissed. The court concluded that the sentence was not manifestly excessive and that the mitigating factors had been appropriately weighed. Consequently, the application to reduce the sentence was refused.
Orders
Orders of the court
Application refused
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.