District Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Lee; R v Ooi [2019] NSWDC 476 Hearing dates: 26 April 2019 Date of orders: 26 April 2019 Decision date: 26 April 2019 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: M L Williams SC DCJ Decision: Lee: A term of imprisonment of 2 years, 3 months with a non-parole period of 18 months: at [22].
Ooi: A term of imprisonment of 18 months with a non-parole period of 13 months: at [22].Catchwords: SENTENCING — Aggravating factors — Breach of conditional liberty
SENTENCING — Mitigating factors — Plea of guilty — Rehabilitation — Remorse
SENTENCING — Relevant factors on sentence — Circumstances of offence— Co-offenders — Joint criminal enterprise — Form 1 offences — Parole period
SENTENCING — Subjective considerations on sentence — Drug addiction — Special circumstancesLegislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999
Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985Cases Cited: McDowall v R [2019] NSWCCA 29
Parente v R [2017] NWSCCA 284Texts Cited: Nil Category: Sentence Parties: Regina (Crown)
John Lee (Offender)
Huey Ooi (Offender)Representation: Ms James (Crown)
Ms Towagi (Offender – Lee)
Mr Scragg (Offender – Ooi)
File Number(s): 2018/163729; 2018/163730
Judgment
-
John Lee, aged 29, and Huey Li Ooi, aged 34, were partners in life and partners in crime and it leads to them both pleading guilty to a charge of supply a prohibited drug on an ongoing basis, under s 25A(1) of the Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985, which carries a maximum penalty of 20 years imprisonment with no standard non‑parole period. This penalty is, of course, a yardstick to be used in the sentencing process, which has to be carried out in accordance with the purposes of sentencing under s 3A of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999.
-
Ms Ooi is also to be dealt with on Form 1, for an offence of knowingly take part in the supply of a prohibited drug, under s 25(1). That matter will be dealt with in the way suggested by the Chief Justice in the guideline judgment on these matters.
-
It is common ground that the agreed facts are relevantly the same for both offenders, and they are summarised in a table of drug supplies. In short, a Police strike force was set up in September 2017 to investigate the supply of drugs in the Redfern area. The first of supply occurred on 7 May 2018 and the last on 24 May 2018. There were 11 incidents involved over that time; seven of which involved Lee handing over drugs, four of which involved Ooi handing over drugs, and the first one, which involved Lee handing over the drugs, also involved Ooi providing a phone number, and that is the basis of the Form 1 matter, so it is clearly encompassed in the overall criminal episode.
-
The modus operandi was to sell drugs to a person that they did not know was an authorised person, obviously, working at the behest of the task force. Lee first…
Continue reading R v Lee; R v Ooi
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- R v Lee; R v Ooi [2019] NSWDC 476
- Case
- [2019] NSWDC 476
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court began by examining the aggravating factors, highlighting the breach of conditional liberty as a significant factor. This breach indicated a disregard for the conditions set for the defendant's release and an increased risk of reoffending. Turning to the mitigating factors, the court acknowledged the pleas of guilty by both defendants, which demonstrated an acceptance of responsibility and a willingness to face the consequences of their actions. The court also considered the efforts made by both defendants towards rehabilitation, including participation in drug treatment programs, and their expressions of remorse. These factors were weighed against the gravity of the offence and the need for deterrence and denunciation.
After weighing all the aggravating and mitigating factors, the court determined that Lee should be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of two years and three months, with a non-parole period of eighteen months. The court considered the severity of the offence, the breach of conditional liberty, and the need for general deterrence. For Ooi, the court imposed a term of imprisonment of eighteen months, with a non-parole period of thirteen months. The court recognised Ooi's efforts towards rehabilitation and his expression of remorse, which were significant mitigating factors.
The court ordered that Lee serve a term of imprisonment of two years and three months, with a non-parole period of eighteen months. Similarly, Ooi was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of eighteen months, with a non-parole period of thirteen months. These sentences reflect the court's consideration of the aggravating and mitigating factors, the nature of the offence, and the need to balance the interests of justice, deterrence, and rehabilitation.
Orders
Orders of the court
Lee: A term of imprisonment of 2 years, 3 months with a non-parole period of 18 months: at [22].
Ooi: A term of imprisonment of 18 months with a non-parole period of 13 months: at [22].
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.