R v Lee

Case [2023] NSWDC 420


District Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: R v Lee [2023] NSWDC 420
Hearing dates: 5 October 2023
Date of orders: 11 October 2023
Decision date: 11 October 2023
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: Lerve DCJ
Decision:

(1)   In respect of the matter to which the offender pleaded guilty he is convicted.

(2)   Consequent upon that conviction the offender is sentenced to a non-parole period of 6 months with a balance of term on parole of 9 months.

(3)   The non-parole period is commence on 21 August 2023 and will expire on 20 February 2024. The balance of term is to commence on 21 February 2024 and will expire on 20 November 2024. The offender is to be released to statutory parole at the expiration of the non-parole period. Parole should be conditioned that he be supervised by the Department of Community Corrections and that he obey all reasonable directions of that service as to ongoing treatment and counselling for substance abuse and mental health conditions.

Catchwords:

Sentence – police pursuit – breach of parole – whether sentence served by ICO

Legislation Cited:

Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999

Cases Cited:

Hopley v R [2008] NSWCCA 105

Stanley v DPP [2023] HCA 23

Tonga, Samuel v R [2023] NSWCCA 120

Zheng v R [2023] NSWCCA 64

Texts Cited:

NIL

Category:Sentence
Parties: Rex (Crown)
Alexander Mark Lee (Offender)
Representation:

Counsel:

Solicitors:

Ms G. Knight for the DPP

Mr M Bernhaut for the offender
File Number(s): 2023/00086346
Publication restriction: NIL

Remarks on Sentence

  1. The offender appeared before a Magistrate at the Wagga Wagga Local Court on 23 August 2023 and was committed to the District Court for Sentence in respect of a charge that he:

On 16 March 2023 at Wagga Wagga in the State of New South Wales, did drive a vehicle namely a Fiat sedan bearing New South Wales registration ending with 66X knowing that police officers were in pursuit of the vehicle and that he was required to stop the vehicle and did not stop the vehicle and then drove the vehicle in a manner dangerous to others.

  1. That offence is contrary to s. 51B(1) of the Crimes Act, 1900 and carries a maximum penalty of 3 years if dealt with on indictment.

  2. As the plea of guilty was entered at an early stage and adhered to at the sentence hearing at the Wagga Wagga District Court on 5 October 2023 the offender is entitled to the full 25% discount for the utilitarian value of the plea of guilty.

Facts

  1. The facts are before the Court by way of Statement of Agreed Facts. The offender was born in 1991 and at the time was the holder of P2 Provisional driver license.

  2. At about 1am on Thursday 16 March 2023 police noticed a grey Fiat sedan with registration plates ending with 66X stopped at a red light at the intersection of Morgan and Baylis Street, Wagga Wagga. Baylis Street is the main street of the city. After the light turned green…

Continue reading R v Lee

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
R v Lee [2023] NSWDC 420
Case
[2023] NSWDC 420
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of R v Lee involved the defendant Lee, who had pleaded guilty to charges stemming from a police pursuit and subsequent breach of parole conditions. The matter was heard in the relevant court, which dealt with serious criminal offences. The primary issue for the court was to determine the appropriate sentence for Lee, considering the nature of the offence and his parole breach. The court also had to decide whether any time Lee had already spent in custody should be taken into account in calculating his sentence.

The court examined the details of the offence, including the circumstances of the police pursuit and the breach of parole conditions. It considered Lee’s criminal history and the factors that contributed to his offending behaviour, such as substance abuse and mental health issues. The court assessed the seriousness of the offence and the need for deterrence and rehabilitation. It also had to determine the appropriate length of the non-parole period and the conditions of parole to ensure public safety and facilitate Lee's rehabilitation.

In delivering its judgment, the court found that Lee's actions warranted a custodial sentence. It took into account the breach of parole as an aggravating factor and the need to address Lee's underlying issues through treatment and counselling. The court imposed a non-parole period of six months and a balance of term on parole of nine months. The non-parole period was set to commence on 21 August 2023 and expire on 20 February 2024, with the balance of term to commence on 21 February 2024 and expire on 20 November 2024. The court also mandated that Lee be released to statutory parole at the expiration of the non-parole period and be supervised by the Department of Community Corrections. Parole conditions included adherence to ongoing treatment and counselling for substance abuse and mental health conditions.

The court's final orders included the conviction of Lee, a sentence of six months non-parole and nine months on parole, and specific conditions for parole supervision and treatment.

Orders

Orders of the court

(1) In respect of the matter to which the offender pleaded guilty he is convicted.

(2) Consequent upon that conviction the offender is sentenced to a non-parole period of 6 months with a balance of term on parole of 9 months.

(3) The non-parole period is commence on 21 August 2023 and will expire on 20 February 2024. The balance of term is to commence on 21 February 2024 and will expire on 20 November 2024. The offender is to be released to statutory parole at the expiration of the non-parole period. Parole should be conditioned that he be supervised by the Department of Community Corrections and that he obey all reasonable directions of that service as to ongoing treatment and counselling for substance abuse and mental health conditions.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.