SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CITATION:
PARTIES:
R
v
LEACH, Jeffrey Francis
(applicant/appellant)FILE NO/S:
CA No 50 of 2004
DC No 484 of 2003
DIVISION:
Court of Appeal
PROCEEDING:
Sentence Application
ORIGINATING COURT:
District Court at Cairns
DELIVERED EX TEMPORE ON:
2 June 2004
DELIVERED AT:
Townsville
HEARING DATE:
2 June 2004
JUDGES:
McMurdo P, Cullinane and Jones JJ
Separate reasons for judgment of each member of the Court, each concurring as to the orders made
ORDERS:
1. Application for leave to appeal against sentence granted
2. Appeal allowed
3. Set aside the sentences in relation to counts 1 and 2 and substitute therefor, an order that the applicant in each of those counts, be sentenced to nine months’ imprisonment and be released on probation for a period of three years, conditioned upon his undertaking such psychiatric, psychological and counselling services as may be directed by the community services officer, together with the standard conditions applicable to probation orders
4. The declaration as to presentence custody made by the learned sentencing Judge continues to apply
CATCHWORDS:
CRIMINAL LAW - JURISDICTION, PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – JUDGMENT AND PUNISHMENT – SENTENCE – APPEAL AGAINST SENTENCE – PARTICULAR OFFENCES – STALKING – where applicant sentenced to concurrent imprisonment terms of twelve, eighteen and six months imprisonment respectively for the charges of stalking, stalking with a circumstance of aggravation and wilful damage – whether trial judge was in error in placing emphasis on the commission of offences during the currency of an earlier probation order – whether trial judge failed to take into account the benefits to the community of controlled treatment undertaken within a community based order rather that in a correctional institute –– whether sentences were manifestly excessive
COUNSEL:
The appellant appeared on his own behalf
J Greggory for the respondent
SOLICITORS:
The appellant appeared on his own behalf
Director of Public Prosecutions (Queensland) for the respondent
JONES J: The applicant seeks leave to appeal against sentences of imprisonment imposed by the District Court at Cairns for one offence of stalking; one offence of stalking with aggravation and one offence of wilful damage. The applicant pleaded guilty to each offence on the 27th of November 2003 and sentences were imposed on the 22nd of January 2004 after the learned sentencing Judge had received a presentence report prepared by the Department of Corrective Services dated the 14th of January 2004 and an addendum report dated the 21st of June 2004.
The first offence of stalking relates to conduct between the 31st of October 2001 and 3 May 2003. The complainant was a 20 year old woman, international student studying in Cairns. She commenced her studies there in August of 2001. The applicant was a member of the same class. He obtained the complainant's phone number and commenced to phone her once or twice a week to discuss course work. He then asked her out socially a few times before the end of the term.
When studies recommenced…
Continue reading R v Leach
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- R v Leach [2004] QCA 189
- Case
- [2004] QCA 189
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court had to determine whether the trial judge was in error in placing emphasis on the commission of the offences during the currency of an earlier probation order, and whether the judge failed to take into account the benefits to the community of controlled treatment undertaken within a community-based order rather than in a correctional institute. The court also had to consider whether the sentences were manifestly excessive. The court found that the trial judge had erred in placing undue emphasis on the commission of the offences during the currency of an earlier probation order. The court also found that the trial judge had failed to take into account the benefits to the community of controlled treatment undertaken within a community-based order rather than in a correctional institute. The court found that the sentences were manifestly excessive and granted leave to appeal against the sentence.
The court allowed the appeal and set aside the sentences in relation to counts 1 and 2. In their place, the court ordered that the applicant be sentenced to nine months’ imprisonment and be released on probation for a period of three years, conditioned upon his undertaking such psychiatric, psychological, and counselling services as may be directed by the community services officer, together with the standard conditions applicable to probation orders. The declaration as to presentence custody made by the learned sentencing judge continues to apply.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. Application for leave to appeal against sentence granted
2. Appeal allowed
3. Set aside the sentences in relation to counts 1 and 2 and substitute therefor, an order that the applicant in each of those counts, be sentenced to nine months’ imprisonment and be released on probation for a period of three years, conditioned upon his undertaking such psychiatric, psychological and counselling services as may be directed by the community services officer, together with the standard conditions applicable to probation orders
4. The declaration as to presentence custody made by the learned sentencing Judge continues to apply
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.