SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CITATION:
R v King [2008] QCA 1
PARTIES:
R
v
KING, Peter
(applicant)FILE NO/S:
CA No 356 of 2007
DC No 2183 of 2007DIVISION:
Court of Appeal
PROCEEDING:
Sentence Application
ORIGINATING COURT:
District Court at BowenDELIVERED EX TEMPORE ON:
30 January 2008DELIVERED AT:
Brisbane
HEARING DATE:
30 January 2008
JUDGES:
de Jersey CJ, Keane JA and Holmes JA
Separate reasons for judgment of each member of the Court, each concurring as to the orders madeORDERS:
Application for leave to appeal granted.
Appeal allowed.
Set aside the sentence of six months imposed in respect of the serious assault and sentence the applicant in lieu to four months imprisonment suspended after two months for an operational period of two years.
CATCHWORDS:
CRIMINAL LAW – APPEAL AGAINST SENTENCE – APPEAL BY CONVICTED PERSONS – APPLICATION TO REDUCE SENTENCE – INTOXICATION – DISORDERLY BEHAVIOUR – ASSAULTING, RESISTING, HINDERING, OR OBSTRUCTING POLICE OFFICER – GENERAL PRINCIPLES – where the intoxicated applicant spat blood and phlegm onto a police officers face and mouth – where applicant pleaded guilty to committing a common assault and a serious assault – where there were mitigating factors – whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive
R v Barry [2007] QCA 48; CA N0 2 of 2007, 23 February 2007, considered
R v Hamilton [2006] QCA 122; CA No 336 of 2005, 21 April 2006, considered
R v Laskus [1996] QCA 120; CA No 56 of 1996, 24 April 1996, consideredCOUNSEL:
M J Byrne QC, with P J McCafferty, for the applicant
G Cash for the respondentSOLICITORS:
Nyst Lawyers for the applicant
Director of Public Prosecutions (Queensland) for the respondent
THE CHIEF JUSTICE: The applicant is a 30 year old man who, when aged 29 years, committed a common assault and a serious assault to which he pleaded guilty in the District Court. For the serious assault he was sentenced to six months' imprisonment suspended after three months for an operational period of two years. For the common assault he was sentenced to two months' imprisonment to be served concurrently with the three months.
At the time of the offences the applicant had no prior criminal history. He subsequently incurred a conviction for obstructing a police officer which the present sentencing Judge described as "really of no consequence" in the District Court proceeding. The applicant seeks leave to appeal against the six months' sentence imposed upon him for the serious assault.
On 9 July 2006 at a backpacker's bar at Airlie Beach in North Queensland security officers found the apparently intoxicated applicant sleeping at a table. He was escorted from the premises to the footpath outside where he was forcibly placed on the ground. The offence of common assault arose from the applicant's scuffle with one of the security officers in the course of which the applicant was injured though not seriously. Police officers were summoned. The applicant could not walk without stumbling and was laughing and…
Continue reading R v King
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- R v King [2008] QCA 1
- Case
- [2008] QCA 1
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issue before the court was whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive. The applicant argued that the sentence was too harsh given the mitigating factors, including the applicant's intoxication at the time of the offence. The applicant also submitted that the sentence was disproportionate to the offence committed.
The court found that the sentence was manifestly excessive and granted the applicant leave to appeal. The court considered the mitigating factors, including the applicant's intoxication, and found that they warranted a reduction in the sentence. The court set aside the sentence of six months imposed in respect of the serious assault and sentenced the applicant in lieu to four months imprisonment, suspended after two months for an operational period of two years. The court held that the sentence was proportionate to the offence committed and took into account the mitigating factors.
Orders
Orders of the court
Application for leave to appeal granted.
Appeal allowed.
Set aside the sentence of six months imposed in respect of the serious assault and sentence the applicant in lieu to four months imprisonment suspended after two months for an operational period of two years.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.