Legal Research
Cases
R v Kalikas

R v Kalikas

Case [2025] SADC 81

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

AGLC: R v Kalikas [2025] SADC 81
Case: [2025] SADC 81
Decision Date: 8 July 2025

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

R v Kalikas [2025] SADC 81

Cases Citing This Decision

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

De Marchi v The King [2024] SASCA 49
Citation 1 (Para 2)

…of four ounces of methamphetamine in a car of which the accused was the sole occupant. [60] Tran v The King [2024] SASCA 27; De Marchi v The King [2024] SASCA 49. [61] See, eg, Lukaj v The King [2022] SASCA 135. [62] Tran v The King [2024] SASACA 27.…
Tran v The King [2024] SASCA 27
Citation 2 (Para 2)

…innocent explanation for the presence of four ounces of methamphetamine in a car of which the accused was the sole occupant. [60] Tran v The King [2024] SASCA 27; De Marchi v The King [2024] SASCA 49. [61] See, eg, Lukaj v The King [2022] SASCA 135. [62] Tran v The King [2024] SASACA 27.…
Sadler v The King [2023] SASCA 63
Citation 3 (Para 36)

…t can be taken into account when considering the possibility of an innocent explanation for the accused’s fingerprint. [72] Sadler v The King [2023] SASCA 63.…
Zenuni v The King [2022] SASCA 106
Citation 4 (Para 18)

…the prosecution must exclude the possibility that the drugs were in the exclusive possession of someone other than the accused. [3] Zenuni v The King [2022] SASCA 106, [48]-[50]. [4] R v GNN (2000) 78 SASR 293, [25]-[26].…
Viscariello v Tamasauskas [2021] SASCA 49
Citation 5

…17) 262 CLR 402; BNM v The Queen [2020] SASCFC 10; Tran v The King [2024] SASCA 27; R v Pringle [2017] SASCFC 9; De Marchi v The King [2021] SASCA 49; Lukaj v The King [2022] SASCA 135; R v Garilli [2009] SASC 22; Phillips v The Queen (2006) 225 CLR 303; Rollond v The Queen (2020) 137 SASR 519; R v Long and McDonn…
Rollond v The Queen [2020] SASCFC 106
Citation 6

…SASCA 49; Lukaj v The King [2022] SASCA 135; R v Garilli [2009] SASC 22; Phillips v The Queen (2006) 225 CLR 303; Rollond v The Queen (2020) 137 SASR 519; R v Long and McDonnell (2002) 137 A Crim R 263; R v C, CA [2013] SASCA 137; Sadler v The King [2023] SASCA 63, applied.…
BNM v The Queen [2020] SASCFC 10
Citation 7 (Para 1)

…ermissible uses of the evidence advocated by the prosecution. [59] These are recognised propensity uses of evidence of this kind: BNM v The Queen [2020] SASCFC 10.…
De Silva v The Queen [2019] HCA 48
Citation 8 (Para 29)

…to satisfy me beyond reasonable doubt of the elements of the offence based on the circumstantial evidence before me.[5] [5] De Silva v The Queen (2019) 268 CLR 57, [12].…
R v Pringle [2017] SASCFC 9
Citation 9 (Para 11)

…Formulated in these terms, the permissible use may be overstated for the reasons given in R v Pringle [2017] SASCFC 9. In that case, the appellant was convicted of trafficking a large commercial quantity of cannabis found in a locked shipping container at his business premises. Evidence was led of the discovery of…
Van Den Hurk v Police [2009] SASC 22
Citation 10

…ng [2024] SASCA 27; R v Pringle [2017] SASCFC 9; De Marchi v The King [2021] SASCA 49; Lukaj v The King [2022] SASCA 135; R v Garilli [2009] SASC 22; Phillips v The Queen (2006) 225 CLR 303; Rollond v The Queen (2020) 137 SASR 519; R v Long and McDonnell (2002) 137 A Crim R 263; R v C, CA [2013] SASCA 137; Sadler…
R v GNN [2000] SASC 447
Citation 11 (Para 18)

…ity that the drugs were in the exclusive possession of someone other than the accused. [3] Zenuni v The King [2022] SASCA 106, [48]-[50]. [4] R v GNN (2000) 78 SASR 293, [25]-[26].…
Phillips v The Queen [2006] HCA 4
Citation 12

…] SASCFC 9; De Marchi v The King [2021] SASCA 49; Lukaj v The King [2022] SASCA 135; R v Garilli [2009] SASC 22; Phillips v The Queen (2006) 225 CLR 303; Rollond v The Queen (2020) 137 SASR 519; R v Long and McDonnell (2002) 137 A Crim R 263; R v C, CA [2013] SASCA 137; Sadler v The King [2023] SASCA 63, applied.…
R v Dookheea [2017] HCATrans 132
Citation 13 (Para 21)

…rosecution proves each element of the offence beyond reasonable doubt. In this respect, I keep in mind the comments of the High Court in R v Dookheea (2017) 262 CLR 402 at [41] concerning the standard of proof: …being satisfied of guilt beyond reasonable doubt does not simply mean concluding that the accused may have…

AI Chat coming soon