R v Ioannou

Case [2021] NSWDC 120


District Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: R v Ioannou [2021] NSWDC 120
Hearing dates: 5 March 2011
Date of orders: 11 March 2021
Decision date: 11 March 2021
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: Buscombe DCJ
Decision:

Aggregate sentence imposed one of 4 years and 4 months imprisonment with a non-parole period of 2 years and 2 months

Convictions recorded under s 10A of Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW)

Two 6 month periods and one 2 year 6 month period of license disqualification, to be served concurrently

Catchwords:

CRIME — Property offences — Larceny

CRIME — Property offences — Break, enter and commit serious indictable offence

CRIME — Property offences — Take and drive a conveyance

CRIME — Driving offences — Driving in manner dangerous to others — Police pursuit

Legislation Cited:

Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) ss 51B(1), 112(1)(a), 117, 154C(2), 192E(1)(b)

Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) ss 3A, 10A, 21A

Road Transport Act 2013 (NSW)

Cases Cited:

Lawson v R [2018] NSWCCA 215

DPP v De La Rosa [2010] NSWCCA 194

Muldrock v R [2011] HCA 39

Bugmy v R (2013) 249 CLR 571

R v Henry (1999) 46 NSWLR 346

Category:Sentence
Parties: Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown)
John Ioannou (Offender)
Representation: Counsel:
Ms Hooper (Crown)
Mr Snelling (Offender)
File Number(s): 2019/228227
Publication restriction: Nil

SENTENCE

Introduction

  1. The offender stands to be sentenced having pleaded guilty to the following offences. One, that between 21 July 2019 and 22 July 2019 at Quakers Hill he stole certain property, namely a handbag containing a wallet, including a Westpac MasterCard, a Commonwealth Bank MasterCard, a driver’s licence, a Medicare card and other personal cards, the property of Grupreet Kaur. That is an offence of larceny under s 117 of the Crimes Act and has a maximum penalty of five years imprisonment and there is no applicable standard non-parole period.

  2. The second offence is that on 22 July 2019 at North St Mary’s the offender by deception, by using a stolen credit card, dishonestly obtained a financial advantage, namely, goods to the value of $84.98. That is an offence under s 192E(1)(b) of the Crimes Act and has a maximum penalty of ten years imprisonment and there is no applicable standard non-parole period.

  3. The third offence is that on 22 July 2019 at Bidwill the offender, without the consent of Papatangi Marsters, a person in lawful possession of a motor vehicle, namely a Holden Barina, took and drove the motor vehicle when Papatangi Marsters was in the motor vehicle and at the time he took and drove the motor vehicle the offender was in the company of Justin Murphy. That is an offence under s 154C(2) of the Crimes Act and has a maximum penalty of 14 years imprisonment and there is an applicable standard non-parole period of five years.

  4. The fourth offence is that between 19 and 20 July 2019 at Turramurra, the offender broke and entered the detached garage of Sharmilla Gosai, situated at unit 22/1292 Pacific Highway,…

Continue reading R v Ioannou

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
R v Ioannou [2021] NSWDC 120
Case
[2021] NSWDC 120
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of R v Ioannou was heard by a court in Australia, involving a defendant accused of various criminal offences. The defendant was charged with multiple counts of serious indictable offences, including larceny, break and enter, taking and driving a conveyance, and driving in a manner dangerous to others during a police pursuit. The matter was ultimately decided by the court, which was tasked with determining the defendant's culpability and appropriate punishment for the alleged crimes.

The legal issues before the court included the interpretation of various sections of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) and the application of sentencing principles to the defendant's conduct. The court had to consider the seriousness of the offences, the defendant's criminal history, and the circumstances surrounding each incident to determine an appropriate aggregate sentence. Additionally, the court was required to assess the defendant's likelihood of reoffending and the need to protect the public from further harm.

The court found the defendant guilty on all counts and imposed an aggregate sentence of 4 years and 4 months imprisonment, with a non-parole period of 2 years and 2 months. The convictions were recorded under section 10A of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW). Furthermore, the court imposed two periods of 6 months and one period of 2 years and 6 months of license disqualification, to be served concurrently. The court's decision balanced the need for punishment, deterrence, and rehabilitation, taking into account the defendant's criminal history and the circumstances of the offences.

Orders

Orders of the court

Aggregate sentence imposed one of 4 years and 4 months imprisonment with a non-parole period of 2 years and 2 months

Convictions recorded under s 10A of Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW)

Two 6 month periods and one 2 year 6 month period of license disqualification, to be served concurrently

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.