R v Huynh

Case [2017] NSWDC 126


District Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: R v Huynh [2017] NSWDC 126
Hearing dates: Trial: 29 November 2016 – 9 December 2016 and Sentence: 24 February 2017 and 7 April 2017
Date of orders: 19 May 2017
Decision date: 19 May 2017
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: Hatzistergos DCJ
Decision:

For the offence of wounding with intent to murder:

1. The offender is convicted;

 

2. I impose a non-parole period of 4 years’ imprisonment, to commence on 4 December 2015 and to expire on 3 December 2019, at which time the offender will be eligible to be released on parole;

 

3. I impose an additional period of 4 years’ imprisonment to date from 4 December 2019 and to expire on 3 December 2023; and

 4. The offender is sentenced to serve an overall term of imprisonment of 8 years.
Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – SENTENCE – wounding with intent to murder – multiple stab wounds – offender in relationship with victim – offender later attempted to commit suicide – low objective seriousness – whether offender’s state of mind relevant to assessment of objective seriousness – whether provocation of offender relevant to assessment of objective seriousness – victim impact statement – Crown concession that victim made good recovery – offender unresolved mental health condition – offender person of good character – excellent prospects of rehabilitation – low likelihood of reoffending – impact of offender’s incarceration on family members – remorse demonstrated – finding of special circumstances
Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s 27
Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) ss 3A, 21A(2), 21A(3), 28(a), 44(1), 47(2)(a) and 54A(b)
Cases Cited: Alkanaan v R [2017] NSWCCA 56
Aslan v R [2014] NSWCCA 114
Christodoulou v R [2008] NSWCCA 102
Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa (2010) 205 A Crim R 1; [2010] NSWCCA 194
Elturk v R [2014] NSWCCA 61
Jeffree v R [2017] NSWCCA 72
Kremisis v R [2016] NSWCCA 257
McLaren v R [2012] NSWCCA 284
R v Delaney (2003) 59 NSWLR 1; [2003] NSWCCA 342
R v Rae [2001] NSWCCA 545
Raczkowski v R [2008] NSWCCA 152
Shine v R [2016] NSWCCA 149
Walker v R [2006] NSWCCA 347
Williams v R [2012] NSWCCA 172
Category:Sentence
Parties: Ms Yen Huynh (Offender)
Regina (Crown)
Representation:

Counsel:
Mr J Overall (Offender)
Ms N Keay (Crown)

  Greenfield Lawyers (Offender)
Solicitor for the Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown)
File Number(s): 2015/357764
Publication restriction: Nil

Judgment

  1. On 9 December 2016, following a trial that commenced on 29 November 2016, the offender was found guilty by a jury of an offence that on 24 November 2015 at Canley Vale in the State of New South Wales, she wounded Mr Louis Casha [1] with the intention of murdering him, contrary to s 27 of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW).

    1. Hereinafter referred to as the “victim”

  2. On 24 February and 7 April 2017, I heard submissions as to sentence and received written submissions from the parties. I reserved my decision…

Continue reading R v Huynh

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
R v Huynh [2017] NSWDC 126
Case
[2017] NSWDC 126
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of R v Huynh, the appellant stood before the court in relation to an offence of wounding with intent to murder, which occurred between the appellant and the victim, his partner. The dispute centred around the severity of the objective seriousness of the offence and the various mitigating and aggravating factors that ought to be considered in determining the appropriate sentence. The case was heard by the court of appeal.

The legal issues that arose for determination included whether the offender's state of mind and the provocation he experienced should be taken into account when assessing the objective seriousness of the offence. Additionally, the court needed to consider the impact of the victim's recovery on the severity of the offence, as well as the offender's mental health condition, character, prospects of rehabilitation, likelihood of reoffending, and the impact of incarceration on his family members. The court also needed to weigh the victim impact statement and the appellant's demonstrated remorse.

The court found that while the offender's state of mind and the provocation were relevant to his culpability, they did not alter the objective seriousness of the offence. However, the court considered the victim's good recovery, the offender's unresolved mental health condition, his good character, excellent prospects of rehabilitation, low likelihood of reoffending, and the impact of his incarceration on his family members. The court also took into account the victim impact statement and the appellant's remorse, ultimately finding that special circumstances existed that warranted a reduced sentence.

The court imposed a non-parole period of 4 years' imprisonment, with an additional 4 years' imprisonment to be served after the non-parole period. The offender was sentenced to serve an overall term of imprisonment of 8 years. The court acknowledged the severity of the offence but also recognised the mitigating factors and the potential for the offender's rehabilitation.

Orders

Orders of the court

For the offence of wounding with intent to murder:

1. The offender is convicted;

2. I impose a non-parole period of 4 years’ imprisonment, to commence on 4 December 2015 and to expire on 3 December 2019, at which time the offender will be eligible to be released on parole;

3. I impose an additional period of 4 years’ imprisonment to date from 4 December 2019 and to expire on 3 December 2023; and

4. The offender is sentenced to serve an overall term of imprisonment of 8 years.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.