SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CITATION:
R v Gray [2005] QCA 280
PARTIES:
R
v
GRAY, Dean Robert
(applicant)FILE NO/S:
CA No 129 of 2005
DC No 2857 of 2004
DC No 463 of 2005DIVISION:
Court of Appeal
PROCEEDING:
Sentence Application
ORIGINATING COURT:
District Court at Brisbane
DELIVERED ON:
12 August 2005
DELIVERED AT:
Brisbane
HEARING DATE:
1 August 2005
JUDGES:
McPherson, Williams and Jerrard JJA
Separate reasons for judgment of each member of the Court, McPherson and Williams JJA concurring as to the order made, Jerrard JA dissentingORDER:
Application for leave to appeal against sentence dismissed
CATCHWORDS:
CRIMINAL LAW – APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL AND INQUIRY AFTER CONVICTION – APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – APPEAL AGAINST SENTENCE – APPEAL BY CONVICTED PERSONS – APPLICATIONS TO REDUCE SENTENCE – WHEN REFUSED – GENERALLY – applicant convicted of dangerous operation of a vehicle causing death and grievous bodily harm while adversely affected by alcohol – applicant sentenced to four years imprisonment suspended after 18 months – applicant’s blood alcohol concentration was 0.125 per cent – applicant had no prior convictions and was 17 years old when the offence was committed – psychiatric report tendered describing applicant’s remorse as ‘manifest and profound’ – whether in all the circumstances the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive
R v Antoney [2000] QCA 180; CA No 402 of 1999, 16 May 2000, considered
R v Cusak; ex parte A-G (Qld) [2000] QCA 239; CA No 90 of 2000, 16 June 2000, considered
R v Hine [2002] QCA 212; CA No 31 of 2002, 21 June 2002, considered
R v Hoad [2005] QCA 92; CA No 434 of 2004, 8 April 2005, distinguished
R v Russell [2002] QCA 285; CA No 91 of 2002, 6 August 2002, distinguished
R v Stephenson [1999] QCA 519; CA No 295 of 1999, 17 December 1999, considered
R v Tabakovic [2005] QCA 90; CA No 3 of 2005, 8 April 2005, considered
R v Thumm; ex parte A-G (Qld)l [1999] QCA 355; CA No 186 of 1999, 27 August 1999, consideredCOUNSEL:
A J Rafter SC with S Ryan for the applicant
R G Martin SC for the respondentSOLICITORS:
Legal Aid Queensland for the applicant
Director of Public Prosecutions (Queensland) for the respondent
McPHERSON JA: I agree with the reasons of Williams JA. The application for leave to appeal against sentence should be dismissed.
WILLIAMS JA: On 28 April 2005 the applicant pleaded guilty in the District Court to a charge that on 31 August 2003 he caused the death Erica Leigh Kovacs and grievous bodily harm to Sophie Therese Fripp by the dangerous operation of a motor vehicle whilst adversely affected by alcohol. He was sentenced to imprisonment for four years but it was ordered that such sentence be suspended after 18 months with an operational period of four years. He was disqualified from holding or obtaining a driver's licence for a period of three years. He seeks leave…
Continue reading R v Gray
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- R v Gray [2005] QCA 280
- Case
- [2005] QCA 280
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court considered the principles of sentencing and the relevant circumstances of the case. The court noted that the applicant's blood alcohol concentration was high, and that the applicant had no prior convictions. However, the court also noted that the applicant was remorseful, and that the psychiatric report described the applicant's remorse as'manifest and profound'. The court considered that the sentence imposed was not manifestly excessive in all the circumstances. The court noted that the sentence imposed was a suspended sentence, and that the applicant would not serve any time in prison unless they breached the conditions of the suspended sentence. The court concluded that the sentence imposed was appropriate in all the circumstances, and dismissed the application for leave to appeal against sentence.
Orders
Orders of the court
Application for leave to appeal against sentence dismissed
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.