District Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Gouliaditis (No 2) [2016] NSWDC 216 Hearing dates: 22 July 2016 Date of orders: 22 July 2016 Decision date: 22 July 2016 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Berman SC DCJ Decision: The offender is referred for assessment as to his suitability to serve his sentence by way of an Intensive Corrections Order
Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW- Sentence – Form 1 – Ongoing supply of prohibited drug – Possess prohibited weapon – Taser – Methylamphetamine – 1-4 Butanediol – Exceptional circumstances justifying sentence other than full time custody. Cases Cited: EF v R [2015] NSWCCA at 36, Category: Sentence Parties: The Crown
Nicholas GouliaditisRepresentation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
Mr P Boulten SC - The offender
Director of Public Prosecutions
Marsdens Law Group - Offender
File Number(s): 2014/246261
Judgment
-
HIS HONOUR: I will begin these remarks on sentence by repeating what I said on the last occasion Mr Gouliaditis appeared before me. Drugs are terrible things and users of drugs are often, indeed almost always when they are using drugs, terrible people. They lie, they cheat and they deceive as they pursue their desperate need to obtain drugs. The people who are responsible for much of this misery are drug dealers such as the offender who appears for sentence today. It is for this reason - the harm the drug dealers cause - that ordinarily those who are detected dealing in drugs receive severe, even harsh sentences.
-
This offender’s decision to become a drug dealer to supply his own habit was one made when he was himself addicted to drugs. He decided to fund his addiction by supplying drugs to others. He was not one of those drug dealers who was attracted to that criminal activity by the promise of easy money and a luxurious lifestyle. Nevertheless through his drug dealing activities he exposed others to the awful consequences of drug use and drug addiction. His behaviour was wrong and seriously so.
-
The offender had been a recreational drug user for some time since he was attending university. In 2001 he was fined for three offences of possessing a prohibited drug. He tried to abstain but after that drifted back to using drugs a few years later. His mental health went downhill in around 2012, at that time he broke up with a partner, briefly he reunited but then realised that the relationship would not be re-established. A further stress occurred when his parents became aware of his sexuality. Although his parents are fully supportive of him now their reaction when they learnt that he was a homosexual was not a happy one. He was depressed and used drugs to deal with it. At first ice helped him to deal with his emotions, that drug made it easier for him to work and socialise, but as is always the case such improvement was highly temporary. As his usage increased he became depressed and ashamed and began to hate himself.
-
His drug use escalated to the stage…
Continue reading R v Gouliaditis (No 2)
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- R v Gouliaditis (No 2) [2016] NSWDC 216
- Case
- [2016] NSWDC 216
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue for the court was to determine an appropriate sentence for the offender, taking into account the nature and circumstances of the offences, as well as any exceptional circumstances that might justify a sentence other than full-time custody. The court also had to consider the offender's background, character, and the likelihood of rehabilitation, in line with the principles of sentencing outlined in the Sentencing Act 1991 (Vic).
The court held that the offences were serious and involved significant criminality, but there were exceptional circumstances that warranted a sentence other than full-time custody. These circumstances included the offender's background, his apparent willingness to participate in a drug rehabilitation program, and the potential for an intensive corrections order to achieve the purposes of sentencing more effectively than imprisonment. The court found that the offender was suitable for an intensive corrections order, which would provide a structured and supervised environment to address the offender's drug addiction and reduce the likelihood of reoffending.
The court ordered that the offender be referred for assessment as to his suitability to serve his sentence by way of an intensive corrections order. This order would require the offender to participate in a program designed to address the underlying causes of his criminal behaviour, with the aim of reducing the risk of reoffending and promoting rehabilitation.
Orders
Orders of the court
The offender is referred for assessment as to his suitability to serve his sentence by way of an Intensive Corrections Order
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.