District Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Fitzsimmonds [2018] NSWDC 470 Hearing dates: 4 December 2018 Date of orders: 04 December 2018 Decision date: 04 December 2018 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Neilson DCJ Decision: Head sentence of nine years imprisonment. I discount that by 25% for the utilitarian value of the offender’s plea of guilty. That reduces the head sentence to six years and nine months.
Non-parole period for this offence is four years and six months.
Parole for a period of two years and three months. The sentence must commence at the time the offender was taken into custody on 16 February 2017.Catchwords: CRIME – SENTENCE – Attempting to possess an unlawfully imported border controlled drug, 39.52 kgs of methylamphetamine – offender involved with a Chinese syndicate which imported 118.24 kgs of methylamphetamine collected nearly 40 kgs of that substance from another (unknown to him) at Auburn and transported to Wiseman’s Ferry where he was arrested - offender had been promised by a person in Hong Kong about one and a half months earlier A$2000 to “pick up some bags in Sydney” – offender trusted with a large quantity of the drug – 42 year old male with 2 dependent teenage children with long history of drug addiction and personal difficulties – sentence of 6 years 9 months, NPP 4 years 6 months Legislation Cited: Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth)
Crimes Act 1914 (Cth)Cases Cited: Chan, Lo and Nguyen v R [2010] NSWCCA 153
Dao v R [2011] NSWCCA 183
Lau and Lau v R [2014] NSWCCA 179
Luong & Anor v DPP (Commonwealth) [2013] VSCA 296
R v Phelps [2018] NSWCCA 192
Xiao v R [2018] NSWCCA 2
Yu v R [2016] NSWCCA 73
Zhang v R [2010] NSWCCA 105Category: Sentence Parties: Regina (Crown)
Bradley Ross Fitzsimmonds (Offender)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
Ms S Hatch (Crown)
Mr I McLachlan (Offender)
Solicitors for the DPP (Crown)
Not recorded (Offender)
File Number(s): 2017/00050667 Publication restriction: Nil
Judgment
-
HIS HONOUR: Bradley Ross Fitzsimmonds stands for sentence as a consequence of having pleaded guilty to a charge of that between 16 February 2017 and 17 February 2017 at Wiseman’s Ferry in this State he did attempt to possess a substance, the substance having been unlawfully imported, the substance being a border controlled drug, namely methylamphetamine and the quantity possessed being a commercial quantity.
-
The commercial quantity of methylamphetamine is 750 grams. As this is a Commonwealth prosecution the amount in question must be the pure drug. The 750 grams represents pure methylamphetamine. The offender attempted to possess 39.52 kilograms of pure methylamphetamine. As the Crown submissions state that was 52.69 times the commercial quantity threshold. The offence in question is one contrary to s 307.5 of the Criminal Code. The maximum penalty for this offence is imprisonment for life and/or a fine of $1,575,000.
-
The offender was scheduled to stand for sentence with Ho Pan Chan, but for some reason Chan was unable to be sentenced today.…
Continue reading R v Fitzsimmonds
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- R v Fitzsimmonds [2018] NSWDC 470
- Case
- [2018] NSWDC 470
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court centred on the appropriate sentence for the appellant's involvement in the importation and possession of the methylamphetamine. The court had to consider the seriousness of the offence, the appellant's culpability, and the principle of proportionality in sentencing. Additionally, the court needed to weigh the appellant's background, including his role within the syndicate, his age, and his responsibilities as a father. The court also had to determine the non-parole period, which is the minimum time the appellant must serve before being eligible for parole.
The court concluded that the head sentence for the offence was nine years imprisonment. It discounted this by 25% to reflect the utilitarian value of the appellant's plea of guilty, reducing the head sentence to six years and nine months. The non-parole period was set at four years and six months, and the appellant was granted parole eligibility after serving two years and three months. The sentence was to commence from the time the appellant was taken into custody on 16 February 2017. The court emphasised the need for deterrence and the protection of the community, while also taking into account the appellant's personal circumstances and the opportunity for rehabilitation.
Orders
Orders of the court
Head sentence of nine years imprisonment. I discount that by 25% for the utilitarian value of the offender’s plea of guilty. That reduces the head sentence to six years and nine months.
Non-parole period for this offence is four years and six months.
Parole for a period of two years and three months. The sentence must commence at the time the offender was taken into custody on 16 February 2017.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.