District Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Fellowes [2024] NSWDC 311 Hearing dates: 31 May 2024 Date of orders: 31 May 2024 Decision date: 31 May 2024 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Haesler SC DCJ Decision: Aggregate imprisonment sentence of 4 years with a non-parole period of two years four months
Catchwords: CRIME — Violent offences — Assault with intent to rob in company— Intimidation
SENTENCING — Aggravating factors — Breach of conditional liberty — Breach of ICO
SENTENCING — Guidelines for sentencing — Role of guidelines
SENTENCING — Mitigating factors — Late plea of guilty
SENTENCING — Penalties — Imprisonment
SENTENCING — Relevant factors on sentence — Deterrence — Co-offenders — Parity — Form 1 offences — Objective seriousness
SENTENCING — Sentencing procedure — Instinctive synthesis— Special circumstances
SENTENCING — Subjective considerations on sentence — Functionally illiterate — Risk of institutionalisation
Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW)
Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW)
Cases Cited: Attorney General's Application under s 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 No 1 of 2002 [2002] NSWCCA 518; (2002) 56 NSWLR 146
Postiglione v The Queen [1997] HCA 26; (1997) 189 CLR 295
R v Craig (District Court (NSW), 1 November 2023 unrep)
R v Henry [1999] NSWCCA 111; (1999) 46 NSWLR 346; (1999) 106 A Crim R 149
Category: Sentence Parties: Blake Fellowes (the offender)
Public Prosecutions (NSW) (Crown)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
B Hart (for the offender)
C Todd (for the Crown)
Justine Hall Lawyer (for the offender)
Public Prosecutions (NSW) (Crown)
File Number(s): 2022/323913
JUDGMENT – ex tempore revised
Introduction
-
Blake Fellowes was born in 1998, he is now 26. He first went to gaol when he was 19. Since August 2018, he has only been in the community for less than six months.
-
On 21 October 2022, he was sentenced to a term of imprisonment but was subject to an Intensive Correction Order. On 29 October 2022 there was the incident at Werri Beach which led to four serious charges. He was arrested for those matters on 30 October 2022. On 22 June 2023 he was granted bail. The Intensive Correction Order (‘ICO’) was restored, but something happened in January 2024. There were 5 days in custody in that intervening period. On 4 February 2024 he was returned to custody where he remains.
-
In the Local Court and when arraigned on the four serious charges in this Court, he said he was not guilty. A trial commenced this week before a jury of 12. When he was first arraigned in front of the jury panel he hesitated at one point, but then he said he was not guilty of each count. After the Crown opening and after the principal complainant in the first count had completed his evidence-in-chief, an adjournment request was made through Fellowes’ counsel, Mr Hart. I granted that request. Fellowes took the time to consult with his barrister and solicitor.
-
I am told, and accept, that Mr Fellowes left school when…
Continue reading R v Fellowes
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- R v Fellowes [2024] NSWDC 311
- Case
- [2024] NSWDC 311
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court undertook an instinctive synthesis of the case, meticulously weighing the aggravating and mitigating factors. Aggravating factors included the defendant's breach of conditional liberty and an earlier breach of an intensive corrections order. However, the court also acknowledged mitigating factors such as the defendant's late plea of guilty and his functional illiteracy. The court recognised the objective seriousness of the offence and the need for deterrence, but also considered the principle of parity with co-offenders and the overall objectives of sentencing. The court gave careful consideration to the sentencing guidelines, emphasising the importance of special circumstances in the determination of the sentence.
After careful deliberation, the court determined that an aggregate imprisonment sentence was warranted. The sentence was set at four years, with a non-parole period of two years and four months. The court's decision reflected a balanced approach, taking into account both the seriousness of the offence and the personal circumstances of the defendant. The sentence was designed to serve the dual purposes of punishment and deterrence, while also considering the potential for rehabilitation and the risk of institutionalisation. The court's decision was grounded in the principles of sentencing law and the specific facts of the case.
Orders
Orders of the court
Aggregate imprisonment sentence of 4 years with a non-parole period of two years four months
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.