R v Farrell

Case [2024] NSWDC 559


District Court


New South Wales

  • Amendment notes
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Farrell [2024] NSWDC 559
Hearing dates: 19/9/24, 20/9/24
Date of orders: 20/9/24
Decision date: 20 September 2024
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: Bourke SC DCJ
Decision:

Convicted and sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 5 years 10 months with a NPP of 3 years 10 months (25/9/23-24/7/27). I find special circumstances. Form 1 taken into account.

Catchwords:

Crime – Sentence - Fire firearm at dwelling house with disregard for safety

Legislation Cited:

Crimes Act 1900

Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999

Cases Cited:

Barlow v R [2008] NSWCCA 96

Dixon v R [2020] NSWCCA 123

DPP (Cth) v De La Rosa [2010] NSWCCA 194

Powell v R [2014] NSWCCA 69

Quealey v R [2010] NSWCCA 116

R v Mitchell [2007] NSWCCA 296

R v Swan [2006] NSWCCA 47

Zabakly v R [2021] NSWCCA 155

Category:Sentence
Parties: NSW DPP – Crown
Aaron Farrell - Offender
Representation: Mr H Cavanagh for Crown
Mr M Hawila for Offender
File Number(s): 23/239019
Publication restriction: The names of any victims or alleged victims have been anonymised

remarks on sentence

  1. Mr Aaron Farrell is for sentence today in relation to an offence of discharging a firearm with reckless disregard for safety, that being an offence under s 93GA(1) of the Crimes Act 1900. That is an offence which carries a maximum penalty of 14 years imprisonment and which has a standard non-parole period specified, namely one of five years. The maximum penalty and the standard non-parole period are of course important guide posts in the sentencing exercise and I have had regard to them in that sense.

  2. The offender pleaded guilty to the offence and is therefore entitled to a 25% discount by reason of that plea and its utilitarian value. In sentencing him for the offence he also asks that I take into account on a Form 1 document a further offence to which he admits that being an offence under s 154A subs (1) (b) of the Crimes Act of knowingly drive a stolen in conveyance.

FACTS

  1. The facts of the offences are agreed and relevantly summarised are as follows.

  2. The victim of the sequence 5 which is the Form 1 matter offence was Mr DO. He was the owner of a 2012 model white Mitsubishi Triton which had certain distinctive modifications. On the evening of 6 October 2022 Mr DO parked the Mitsubishi in the carpark of a four wheel drive accessory store at Prestons. The intention was that staff of that store would carry out some work on the vehicle the next day. However, at 9am the next day Mr DO received a call from the shop asking whether he intended to bring the vehicle in, to which he replied that he had already left it in the carpark and that he had left the keys in a lockbox at the store. The staff of the store however confirmed that the vehicle was not there and nor were the keys.

Continue reading R v Farrell

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
R v Farrell [2024] NSWDC 559
Case
[2024] NSWDC 559
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The defendant in this case, Farrell, was convicted and sentenced for firing a firearm at a dwelling house in a manner that showed a reckless disregard for safety. The matter was heard and determined in the relevant court of criminal jurisdiction. The primary focus of the case was the appropriate sentence to be imposed on the defendant given the gravity of the offence.

The court was tasked with determining the severity of the sentence in light of the circumstances of the offence, the need for deterrence, and the rehabilitation of the offender. The key legal issue was the balance between the need to protect the community and the potential for the defendant's rehabilitation. The court also had to consider the impact of the offence on the victims and any special circumstances that might warrant a departure from the usual sentencing principles.

In reaching its decision, the court meticulously evaluated the evidence and submissions presented. It found that the offence was of a serious nature, involving a deliberate and dangerous act that endangered lives. The court also recognised the presence of special circumstances that warranted a higher sentence. After considering all relevant factors, the court determined that a term of imprisonment of 5 years and 10 months was appropriate, with a non-parole period of 3 years and 10 months. The sentence was backdated to reflect the time already served by the defendant.

Orders

Orders of the court

Convicted and sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 5 years 10 months with a NPP of 3 years 10 months (25/9/23-24/7/27). I find special circumstances. Form 1 taken into account.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.