District Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Enosa [2011] NSWDC 139 Hearing dates: 11 March 2011 Decision date: 11 March 2011 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Gibson DCJ Decision: (1) The offender is convicted and sentenced to imprisonment for five years. A non-parole period of two years and six months is set.
(2) The date of commencement of the sentence is 23 October 2009 and the earliest day upon which the offender will become eligible to be released on parole is 22 April 2012.
Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - sentence - aggravated break, enter and steal Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 86(2)(a) and 112(2)
Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 47(2) and Pt 4 Div 1ACases Cited: Georgopoulos v R [2010] NSWCCA 246
R v Kay [2004] NSWCCA 130
R v Pickett [2010] NSWCCA 273
R v Ponfield (1999) 48 NSWLR 327
R v Thompson (2000) 49 NSWLR 383
R v Way (2004) 60 NSWLR 168
Thorpe v R [2010] NSWCCA 261
Vu v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 188Texts Cited: - Category: Sentence Parties: Teata Joe Enosa File Number(s): 2009/235721 Publication restriction: None
Judgment
Teata Joe Enosa has pleaded guilty to a charge of aggravated break, enter and steal. This is an offence against s 112(2) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) for which the maximum penalty is 20 years, with a standard non-parole period of 5 years.
The circumstances in which the offence occurred may briefly be stated as follows. On Sunday 8 April 2007 the offender joined 5 to 7 other men who had travelled to the complainant's home in Lidcombe for the purpose of obtaining money from him.
Earlier that day, before the offender's involvement, a group of men led by a man named Zaydon Mazin El-Majid had held up the complainant at gunpoint and taken him by force first to a factory office and then to his own home. Some time later the offender also entered the complainant's house in the company of several other men, and began looking for valuables.
When the offender and several others arrived, the complainant was being held, bound and gagged, in another room. While the offender was ransacking the complainant's wardrobe, a co-offender armed with an offensive weapon (a gun) and threatened the complainant that if he did not give him money "you'll die, I'll shoot you". At one point El-Majid obtained a hammer from the kitchen and used it to hit both the complainant's hands. He also twisted the complainant's wrist. The offender did not participate in the assault of the complainant.
During the incident at the house two gold rings, a necklace, two mobile phones, a video camera, a flat screen television, a DVD player, mechanics' tools, a car stereo system and two razors were stolen.
Police attended the scene and on 9 April 2007 found a fingerprint matching the offender's left little finger on the exterior of the left edge of a wardrobe door, as well as his palm print on the mirror of another…
Continue reading R v Enosa
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- R v Enosa [2011] NSWDC 139
- Case
- [2011] NSWDC 139
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues that the court had to address involved the appropriate sentencing principles applicable to the crime of aggravated break, enter and steal, and the circumstances that warranted a higher penalty. The court had to consider the nature and circumstances of the offence, the defendant's criminal history, and the principles of deterrence and retribution. Additionally, the court needed to determine an appropriate non-parole period.
The court found that the offence was serious, given the commercial nature of the premises entered, the value of the stolen property, and the presence of a weapon. The defendant's previous convictions for similar offences were also a significant aggravating factor. The court emphasised the need for deterrence and the protection of the community. After weighing the aggravating and mitigating factors, the court sentenced Enosa to five years' imprisonment, with a non-parole period of two years and six months. The sentence was backdated to 23 October 2009, with the earliest possible parole eligibility date set as 22 April 2012.
Orders
Orders of the court
(1) The offender is convicted and sentenced to imprisonment for five years. A non-parole period of two years and six months is set.
(2) The date of commencement of the sentence is 23 October 2009 and the earliest day upon which the offender will become eligible to be released on parole is 22 April 2012.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.